Blinded or Nonblinded Randomized Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation Research: A Conceptual Analysis Based on a Systematic Review

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2020, Pages 183-190

  Malmivaara, Antti ^a   Armijo Olivo, Susan ^b,c   Dennett, Liz ^d   Heinemann, Allen W ^e   Negrini, Stefano ^f   Arokoski, Jari ^g  

^a ORTON ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^c Rehabilitation Research Center   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^g HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Blinding; Conceptual Analysis; Double Blinding; Randomized Controlled Trials; Rehabilitation; Systematic Review

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REHABILITATION RESEARCH;

DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REHABILITATION RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85080895869     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: 15377385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001369     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264-9,. W64
2. Armijo-Olivo S, Fuentes J, da Costa BR,: Blinding in physical therapy trials and its association with treatment effects: A meta-epidemiological study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 96: 34-44
3. Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT NPT Group: CONSORT statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: A 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts. Ann Intern Med 2017; 167: 40-7
4. Malmivaara A,: Validity and generalizability of findings of randomized controlled trials on arthroscopic partial meniscectomy of the knee. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2018; 28: 1970-81
5. Malmivaara A,: Pure intervention effect or effect in routine health care-Blinded or non-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18: 91
6. Puhl AA, Reinhart CJ, Doan JB,: The quality of placebos used in randomized, controlled trials of lumbar and pelvic joint thrust manipulation-a systematic review. Spine J 2017; 17: 445-56
7. Nuësch E, Reichenbach S, Trelle S,: The importance of allocation concealment and patient blinding in osteoarthritis trials: A meta-epidemiologic study. Arthritis Rheum 2009; 61: 1633-41
8. Moroz A, Freed B, Tiedemann L,: Blinding measured: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013; 2013: 708251
9. Minns Lowe CJ, Wilson MS, Sackley CM,: Blind outcome assessment: The development and use of procedures to maintain and describe blinding in a pragmatic physiotherapy rehabilitation trial. Clin Rehabil 2011; 25: 264-74
10. Losina E, Ranstam J, Collins JE,: OARSI clinical trials recommendations: Key analytic considerations in design, analysis, and reporting of randomized controlled trials in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2015; 23: 677-85
11. Liu CJ, LaValley M, Latham NK,: Do unblinded assessors bias muscle strength outcomes in randomized controlled trials of progressive resistance strength training in older adults? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 90: 190-6
12. Kamper SJ,: Blinding: Linking evidence to practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018; 48: 825-6
13. Hrobjartsson A, Emanuelsson F, Skou Thomsen AS,: Bias due to lack of patient blinding in clinical trials. A systematic review of trials randomizing patients to blind and nonblind sub-studies. Int J Epidemiol 2014; 43: 1272-83
14. Hopton AK, Macpherson H,: Assessing blinding in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture: Challenges and recommendations. Chin J Integr Med 2011; 17: 173-6
15. Bishop FL, Jacobson EE, Shaw J,: Participants' experiences of being debriefed to placebo allocation in a clinical trial. Qual Health Res 2012; 22: 1138-49
16. Villamar MF, Contreras VS, Kuntz RE,: The reporting of blinding in physical medicine and rehabilitation randomized controlled trials: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2013; 45: 6-13
17. Solari A,: Methodological aspects of randomized controlled trials on cognitive interventions. Neurol Sci 2010; 31 (suppl 2): S279-82
18. Malmivaara A,: Assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation and optimizing effectiveness in routine clinical work. J Rehabil Med 2018; 50: 849-51
19. Negrini S, Arienti C, Pollet J,: Clinical replicability of rehabilitation interventions in randomized controlled trials reported in main journals is inadequate. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 114: 108-17
20. Malmivaara A,: Generalizability of findings from randomized controlled trials is limited in the leading general medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 107: 36-41