“Unacceptable conclusions” and the “man” question: masculinity, gender, and international relations

The "Man" Question in International Relations

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 54-72

  Smith, Steve ^a  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85079910994     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429061073-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (12)

1. Arthur Brittan, Masculinity and Power (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989), p. 200.
2. Tania Modleski, Feminism Without Women: Culture and Criticism in a “Postfeminist” Age ("London: Routledge, 1991), p. 5.
3. Fred Halliday, “Hidden from International Relations: Women and the International Arena,” Millennium 17, 3 (1988), pp. 419-428.
4. Rob Walker and Richard Ashley, eds., “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissidence in International Studies,” special issue of International Studies Quarterly 34, 3 (1990).
5. Christopher Coker, “Women and International Relations,” Salisbury Review (June 1990), pp. 23-27.
6. Lord Max Beloff, “Elite and Proud of It,” Times Higher Education Supplement (August 9, 1996), p. 13.
7. Robert Keohane, “International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint,” Millennium 18, 2 (1989), pp. 245-253.
8. Steve Smith, “The Forty Years Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations,” Millennium 21, 3 (1992), pp. 489-506.
9. Marysia Zalewski, “The Women/‘Women’ Question in International Relations,” Millennium 23, 2 (1994), pp. 407-423.
10. Victor Seidler, Rediscovering Masculinity: Reason, Language and Sexuality (London: Routledge, 1989)
11. R. W. Connell, Masculinities (London: Routledge, 1995).
12. Carol Cohn, “Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals,” Signs 12, 4 (1987), pp. 687-718.