Visual literacy theory

Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 481-502

  Messaris, Paul ^a   Moriarty, Sandra ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85079544895     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Arnheim, R. (1989). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Bazin, Andre. (1967).What is cinema? (Hugh Gray, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Boden, M. (1991). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. New York: Basic Books.
4. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Braden, R., & Hortin, J. (1982). Identifying the theoretical foundations of visual literacy. Journal of Visual Verbal Languaging, 2(2): 37-51.
6. Brower, Kenneth. (1998, May). Photography in the age of falsification. The Atlantic Online. Available at www.theatlantic.com.
7. Brugioni, D. A. (1999). Photo fakery: The history and techniques of photographic deception and manipulation. Herndon, VA: Brasseys.
8. Burmark, L. (2002). Visual literacy: Learn to see, see to learn. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
9. Carroll, N. (1996). Theorizing the moving image. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Corliss, R. (2003, June 16). Summer of vroooom. Time Online Edition. Available at: www.time.com.
11. Curtiss, D. (1987). Introduction to visual literacy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12. Debes, J. (1969). The loom of visual literacy. Audiovisual Instruction, 14(8), 25-27.
13. Dondis, D. (1973). A primer of visual literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Franck, F. (1979). The awakened eye. New York: First Vintage Books Edition.
15. Francesky, R. B., &Debes, J. (1972). Visual literacy:Away to learn-Away to teach.Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communication and Technology.
16. Galan, L. S. (1986). The use of subjective point of viewin persuasive communication. M.A. thesis, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
17. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
18. Griffith, D.W. (1972). The man who invented Hollywood: The autobiography of D. W. Griffith (James Hart, Ed.). Louisville, KY: Touchstone Publishing.
19. Hargittai, I., &Hargittai, M. (1994). The use of artistic analogies in chemical research and education. Leonardo, 27(1), 223-226.
20. Harman, D. (2003, March 25). CNN vs. Al Jazeera: Seeing is often believing. Available at. www.csmonitor. com/2003/0325/p01s04-woiq.htm.
21. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. (1982). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. New York:Wiley.
22. Hobbs, R., Frost, R., Davis, A., &Stauffer, J. (1988). Howfirst-time viewers comprehend editing conventions. Journal of Communication, 38(4), 50-60.
23. Huston, A. C., Greer, D., Wright, J. C., Welch, R., & Ross, R. (1984). Children's comprehension of televised formal features with masculine and feminine connotations. Developmental Psychology, 20(4), 707-716.
24. John-Steiner, V. (1985). Notebooks of the mind: Explorations of thinking. Albuquerque: University of NewMexico Press.
25. Kember, S. (2003). The shadow of the object: Photography and realism. In LizWells (Ed.), The photography reader (pp. 202-217). New York: Routledge.
26. Kemp, M. (2000). Visualizations: The Nature book of art and science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27. Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (1971). The unique perspective of television and its effect: A pilot study. In W. Schramm & D. F. Roberts, (Eds.), The process and effects of mass communication, Rev. ed., (pp. 169-188). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
28. Lester, P. M. (Ed.). (1996). Images that injure: Pictorial stereotypes in the media. New York: Praeger.
29. Lester, P. M. (2000). Visual communication (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
30. Lohr, Linda L. (2002). Creating graphics for learning and performance: Lessons in visual literacy. New York:Prentice-Hall.
31. Marchand, R. (1985). Advertising the American dream. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Messaris, P. (1994). Visual literacy: Image, mind&reality. Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
33. Messaris, P. (1997). Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Messaris, P. (1998, Winter). Visual aspects of media literacy. Journal of Communication, 70-80.
35. Meyrowitz, J. (1986). Television and interpersonal behavior: Codes of perception and response. In G. Gumpert & R. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/media (pp. 253-272). New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Mitchell, M. (1993). Analogy-making as perception: A computer model. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Moriarty, S., & Shaw, D. (1995, Spring). An antiseptic war. Visual Communication Quarterly, 4-8.
38. Morreale, J. (1991). A New Beginning: A textual frame analysis of the political campaign film. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39. Mulvey, L. (1989). Visual and other pleasures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
40. Newton, J. (2000). The burden of visual truth: The role of photojournalism in mediating reality. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Paivio, A. On exploring visual knowledge. In B. S. Randhawa&W. E. Coffman (Eds.), Visual learning, thinking, and communication (pp. 113-131). New York: Academic Press.
42. Prince, S. (1990). Are there Bolsheviks in your breakfast cereal? In Sari Thomas & William A. Evans (Eds.), Communication and culture: Language, performance, technology, and media (pp. 180-184). Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
43. Qusti, R. (2003, March 26). Study in contrast:CNNvs. Al-Jazeera. Arab News. Available at: Foi.missouri.edu/ jourwarcoverage/studyincontrasts.html.
44. Rachman, S. (1966). Sexual fetishism: An experimental analogue. Psychological Record, 16, 293-296.
45. Rachman, S., & Hodgson, R. J. (1968). Experimentally-induced "sexual fetishism": Replication and development. Psychological Record, 18, 25-27.
46. Rosler, M. (1991). Image simulations, computer manipulations: Some considerations. Ten, 8, 22.
47. Schamber, L. (1987). Visual literacy in mass communications: A proposal for educators. San Antonio, TX:Annual Conference of the Visual Communication Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
48. Seels, B. A. (1994). Visual literacy: The definition problem. In David M. (Mike) Moore and Francis M. Dwyer (Eds.), Visual literacy: A spectrum of visual learning (pp. 97-112). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
49. Slaney, C. (2003). CNN vs Al Jazeera-Whose war will you watch? Middle East Times. Available at:www.metimes.com/2K3/issue2003-8/reg/cnn vs al.html.
50. Stafford, B. M. (1999). Visual analogy: Consciousness as the art of connecting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Stout, R. (1984). Pavlov founded advertising because he showed that imagery could be transferred. Television/Radio Age (31), 160.
52. Sturken, M., & Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Tidhar, C. E. (1984). Children communicating in cinematic codes: Effects on cognitive skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 957-965.
54. Tucker, A. (2001). Visual literacy:Writing about art. New York: McGraw-Hill.
55. Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
56. Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual explanations: Images and quantities, evidence and narrative. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
57. Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2d. ed.). Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
58. Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
59. Welch, R., Huston-Stein, A., Wright, J., & Plehal, R. (1979). Subtle sex-role cues in children's commercials. Journal of Communication, 29(3), 202-209.
60. Wells, B., Burnett, J., & Moriarty, S. (2003). Advertising principles&practices (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
61. Wheeler, T. (2003). Phototruth or photofiction? Ethics and media imagery in the digital age. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62. Wilde, J., & Wilde, R. (2000). Visual literacy: A conceptual approach to graphic problem solving. New York:Watson-Guptill.
63. Witkowski, M. (2003).The bottle that isn't there and the duck that can't be heard:The "subjective correlative" in commercial messages. Studies in Media&Information Literacy Education, 3(3).
64. Wolfe, A., & Sleeper, B. (1994). Migrations:Wildlife in motion. Hillsboro, OR: Beyond words Publishing.
65. Worth, S. & Adair, J. (1972). Through Navajo eyes: An exploration in film communication and anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
66. Zuckerman, C. (1990). Rugged cigarettes and sexy soap: Brand images and the acquisition of meaning through associational juxtaposition of visual imagery. M.A. thesis, the Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.