Infringers

Music and Copyright, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 189-207

  Marshall, Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85079314899     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203036105-17     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., (2001), No. 00-16401 (9th Cir. Feb. 12).
2. Abrams, H. (1983), ‘The historic foundation of American copyright law: exploding the myth of common law copyright’, Wayne Law Review 29 (3): 1120-91.
3. Alderman, J. (2001), Sonic Boom: Napster, P2P and the Future of Music, London: Fourth Estate.
4. Bennett, A. (2000), Popular Music and Youth Culture, London: Palgrave.
5. Bentley, L. (1989), ‘Sampling and copyright: is the law on the right tr&cW, Journal of Business Law, March: 118-25 (part 1) and September: 405-13 (part 2).
6. Borland, J. (2001), ‘Copy-protected CDs quietly slip into stores’, Cnet.com Available from http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-202-6604222.html (last visited 24 July 2001).
7. Boyle, J. (1996), Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society, London: Harvard.
8. Boyle, J. (2000), ‘Britney Spears and online music fears’, Financial Times, 24 May.
9. Bricklin, D. (2003), ‘The recording industry is trying to kill the goose that lays the golden egg’. Available from http://www.bricklin.com/recordsales.htm (last visited 13/5/03).
10. Brown, B., Geelhoed, E. and Sellen, A. (2001), ‘The use of conventional and new music media: implications for future technologies’, Proceedings of Interact 2001, Tokyo, Japan.
11. Cavicchi, D. (1999), Tramps Like Us: Music and Meaning among Springsteen Fans, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. DeNora, T. (2000), Music in Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Dossick, H. J. and Halberstadter, D. (2001), ‘Facing the music: the fate of Napster in Federal Court will have far-reaching implications for the distribution of all forms of entertainment over the internet’, Los Angeles Lawyer (April), 34-40.
14. Feather, J. (1994), Publishing, Piracy and Politics: A Historical Study of Copyright in Britain, New York: Mansell.
15. Frith, S. (2003), ‘Illegality and the music industry’, in M. Talbot (ed.), The Business of Music, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 195-216.
16. Goldstein, P. (1994), Copyright’s Highway: The Law and Lore of Copyright from Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox, New York: Hill and Wang.
17. Gordon, W. (1982), ‘Fair use as market failure: a structural and economic analysis of the Betamax case and its predecessors’, Columbia Law Review 82 (8): 1600-57.
18. International Federation of Phonographic Industries (IFPI) (2002), Music Piracy Report. Available from http://www.ifpi.org/ (last visited 13/5/03).
19. Jaszi, P. (1996), ‘Goodbye to all that - a reluctant (and perhaps premature) adieu to the constutionally-grounded discourse of public interest in copyright law’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 29 (May): 595-611.
20. King, B. (2001), ‘Farewell free downloads’, Wired.com, Available at http:// wired.com/news/print/0,1294,44412,00.html (last visited 18 June 2001).
21. King, B. (2002), ‘Slagging over CD Sales’, available at http://www.wired.com/news/mp3/0,1285,51880,00.html (last visited 13/5/03).
22. Kretschmer, M. (1999), In Defence of Piracy, unpublished paper.
23. Kretschmer, M. (2000), ‘Intellectual property in music: a historical analysis of rhetoric and institutional practices’, Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 6 (Harwood) special issue: ‘Cultural Industry’ (P. Jeffcutt (ed.)): 197-223.
24. Litman, J. (1987), ‘Copyright, compromise, and legislative history’, Cornell Law Review 72 (July): 857-904.
25. Litman, J. (2000), ‘The demonization of piracy’, CFP 2000: Challenging the Assumptions. Tenth Conference on Computers, Freedom and Privacy, Toronto Canada, 6 April 2000. Available from http://www.law.wayne.edu/litman/papers/demon.pdf (last visited 22/6/01).
26. Lowenstein, J. (2002), The Author s Due: Printing and the Prehistory of Copyright, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. McCullagh, D. (2001), ‘New copyright bill heads to DC, Wired.com Available from http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,46655,00.html (last visited 13/5/03).
28. Marshall, L. (2004a), ‘The effects of piracy upon the music industry: a case study of bootlegging’, Media Culture and Society 26 (2): 163-81.
29. Marshall, L. (2004b forthcoming), Bootlegging: Romanticism and Copyright in the Music Industry, London: Sage.
30. Netanel, N. W. (1996), ‘Copyright and a democratic civil society’, Yale Law Journal 106: 283-387.
31. Patterson, L. R. (1968), Copyright in a Historical Perspective, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
32. Sanjek, D. (1994), '“Don’t have no DJ no more”: sampling and the “autonomous” creator’, M. Woodmansee and P. Jaszi (eds), The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature, Durham: Duke University Press, 343-60.
33. Vaidhyanathan, S. (2001), Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How it Threatens Creativity, New York: New York University Press.
34. Willis, P. (1990), Common Culture, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
35. British Phonographic Industry: http://www.bpi.co.uk/
36. Campaign for Digital Rights: http://ukcdr.org/
37. Electronic Frontier Foundation: http://www.eff.org/
38. Findlaw Napster archive: http:\\nevPs.fmdlavp.com\legalnews\lit\napster\
39. International Federation of Photographic Industries: http://www.ifpi.org/
40. Recording Industry Association of America: http://www.riaa.com/