|
Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2020, Pages 310-311
|
Author Correction: China’s response to a novel coronavirus stands in stark contrast to the 2002 SARS outbreak response (Nature Medicine, (2020), 26, 3, (310-311), 10.1038/s41591-020-0771-1);China’s response to a novel coronavirus stands in stark contrast to the 2002 SARS outbreak response
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
2019 NOVEL CORONAVIRUS;
BEHAVIOR;
CHINA;
COMMUNICABLE DISEASE CONTROL;
CORONAVIRINAE;
CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019;
CORONAVIRUS INFECTION;
DIPLOMACY;
DRUG RESPONSE;
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR;
EPIDEMIC;
GLOBAL HEALTH;
GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HUMAN;
NOTE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME;
SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS 2;
TRAVEL;
TREATMENT RESPONSE;
AFRICA;
BETACORONAVIRUS;
GENETICS;
PANDEMIC;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
VIRUS PNEUMONIA;
AFRICA;
BETACORONAVIRUS;
CHINA;
CORONAVIRUS INFECTIONS;
DISEASE OUTBREAKS;
HUMANS;
PANDEMICS;
PNEUMONIA, VIRAL;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME;
|
EID: 85078490773
PISSN: 10788956
EISSN: 1546170X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0816-5 Document Type: Erratum |
Times cited : (99)
|
References (18)
|