메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metaldehyde
[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

Metaldehyde; molluscicide; peer review; pesticide; risk assessment

Indexed keywords


EID: 85078393618     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1856     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (10)

References (12)
  • 7
    • 79953755669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil
    • EFSA (2007). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. The EFSA Journal (2007) 622, 1–32.
    • (2007) The EFSA Journal (2007) , vol.622 , pp. 1-32
  • 8
    • 84882502938 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request of EFSA related to FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of groundwater contamination
    • EFSA (2004a). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request of EFSA related to FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of groundwater contamination. The EFSA Journal (2004) 93, 1–20.
    • (2004) The EFSA Journal (2004) , vol.93 , pp. 1-20
  • 9
    • 84882502938 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA on the appropriateness of using the current FOCUS surface water for estimating exposure for risk assessment of aquatic ecotoxicology in the context of Council Directive 91/414/EEC
    • EFSA (2004b). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA on the appropriateness of using the current FOCUS surface water for estimating exposure for risk assessment of aquatic ecotoxicology in the context of Council Directive 91/414/EEC. The EFSA Journal (2004) 145, 1–31.
    • (2004) The EFSA Journal (2004) , vol.145 , pp. 1-31
  • 10
    • 77956928672 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals on request of EFSA
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals on request of EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(12):1438.
    • (2009) EFSA Journal 2009; , vol.7 , Issue.12 , pp. 1438
  • 11
    • 3042767718 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC
    • EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2
    • FOCUS (2001). “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp.
    • (2001) Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios , pp. 245
  • 12
    • 0003612765 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances
    • pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002
    • FOCUS (2000). “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances”. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002.
    • (2000) Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2 , pp. 202


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.