Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prochloraz

EFSA Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2011, Pages

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

fungicide; peer review; pesticide; Prochloraz; risk assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85078385290     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2323     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Christiansen S, Scholze M, Dalgaard M, Vinggaard AM, Axelstad M, et al. 2009 Synergistic Disruption of External Male Sex Organ Development by a Mixture of Four Antiandrogens. Environ Health Perspect 117(12): doi:10.1289/ehp.0900689.
2. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2011. Peer Review Report to the conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prochloraz.
3. nd Ed. 1972. ISBN 9780878195428.
4. Ireland, 2007. Draft Assessment Report (DAR) on the active substance prochloraz prepared by the rapporteur Member State Ireland in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, January 2007.
5. Ireland, 2010. Additional Report to the Draft Assessment Report on the active substance prochloraz prepared by the rapporteur Member State Ireland in the framework of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, July 2010.
6. Ireland, 2011. Final Addendum to the Additional Report on prochloraz, compiled by EFSA, June 2011.
7. 15:
8. EFSA, 2004a. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request of EFSA on the appropriateness of using the current FOCUS surface water scenarios for estimating exposure for risk assessment in aquatic ecotoxicology in the context of Council Directive 91/414/EEC1. The EFSA Journal (2004) 145.
9. EFSA, 2004b. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request of EFSA related to FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of groundwater contamination. The EFSA Journal (2004) 93.
10. EFSA, 2007. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. The EFSA Journal (2007) 622.
11. EFSA, 2009. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals on request of EFSA. EFSA Journal 2009; 7(12):1438.
12. European Commission, 1999. Guidelines for the generation of data concerning residues as provided in Annex II part A, section 6 and Annex III, part A, section 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, 1607/VI/97 rev.2, 10/6/1999.
13. European Commission, 2000. Technical Material and Preparations: Guidance for generating and reporting methods of analysis in support of pre- and post-registration data requirements for Annex II (part A, Section 4) and Annex III (part A, Section 5) of Directive 91/414. SANCO/3030/99 rev.4, 11 July 2000.
14. European Commission, 2002a. Guidance Document on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10329/2002 rev.2 final, 17 October 2002.
15. European Commission, 2002b. Guidance Document on Aquatic Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/3268/2001 rev 4 (final), 17 October 2002.
16. European Commission, 2002c. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/4145/2000.
17. European Commission, 2004a. Guidance document on residue analytical methods. SANCO/825/00 rev. 7, 17 March 2004.
18. European Commission, 2004b. Guidance Document on Dermal Absorption. SANCO/222/2000 rev. 7, 19 March 2004.
19. European Commission, 2009. Guidance Document on the Assessment of the Equivalence of Technical Materials of Substances Regulated under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10597/2003 – rev. 8.1, May 2009.
20. FOCUS, 2000. “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances”. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002.
21. FOCUS, 2001. “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp.
22. FOCUS (2006). “Guidance Document on Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU Registration” Report of the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics, EC Document Reference Sanco/10058/2005 version 2.0, 434 pp.
23. FOCUS (2008). “Pesticides in Air: Considerations for Exposure Assessment”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Pesticides in Air, EC Document Reference SANCO/10553/2006 Rev 2 June 2008.
24. FOCUS, 2007. “Landscape And Mitigation Factors In Aquatic Risk Assessment. Volume 1. Extended Summary and Recommendations”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0. 169 pp.
25. JMPR, 2004. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues, Rome, Italy, 20–29 September 2004, Report 2004, 383 pp.
26. JMPR, 2007. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues, Geneva, Switzerland, 18–27 September 2007, Report 2007, 164 pp.
27. SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry), 2001. Guidance Document on Regulatory Testing and Risk Assessment procedures for Plant Protection Products with Non-Target Arthropods. ESCORT 2.