Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metam

EFSA Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

fungicide; herbicide and insecticide; metam; metam potassium; metam sodium; nematicide; peer review; pesticide; risk assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85078383889     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2334     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ACD/ChemSketch, Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., ACD/Labs Release: 12.00 Product version: 12.00 (Build 29305, 25 Nov 2008).
2. Belgium, 2007. Draft Assessment Report (DAR) on the active substance metam prepared by the rapporteur Member State RMS in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, August 2007.
3. Belgium, 2007b. Draft Assessment Report (DAR) on the active substance dazomet prepared by the rapporteur Member State RMS in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, April 2007.
4. Belgium, 2008. Final Addendum to Draft Assessment Report on metam, compiled by EFSA, September 2008.
5. Belgium, 2010. Additional Report to the Draft Assessment Report on the active substance a.s prepared by the rapporteur Member State RMS in the framework of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, August 2010.
6. Belgium, 2011. Final Addendum to the Additional Report on metam, compiled by EFSA, May 2011. California Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. Evaluation of Methyl Isothiocyanate as a toxic air contaminant. California Department of Pesticide Regulation, August 2002.
7. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2011. Peer review report to the conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metam.
8. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metam. EFSA Scientific Report (2008) 203.
9. European Commission, 2002. Guidance Document on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10329/2002 rev.2 final, 17 October 2002.
10. European Commission, 2002b. Guidance Document on Aquatic Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/3268/2001 rev 4 (final), 17 October 2002.
11. European Commission, 2002c. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/4145/2000.
12. European Commission, 2003. Guidance Document On The Assessment Of The Equivalence Of Technical Materials Of Substances Regulated Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10597/2003 -rev. 8.1-1.
13. European Commission, 2003b. Guidance document on assessment of the relevance of metabolites in groundwater of substances regulated under council directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/221/2000-rev 10-final, 25 February 2003.
14. European Commission, 2009. Review report for the active substance metam finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health at its meeting on 26 February 2009 in support of a decision concerning the non-inclusion of metam in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance. SANCO/206/2008 - final, 28 July 2009.
15. FOCUS, 2000. “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances”. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002
16. FOCUS, 2001. “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp.
17. FOCUS, 2007. Landscape and mitigation factor in aquatic ecological risk assessment. EC Document Reference Sanco/10422/2005, version 2.0, September 2007.
18. SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry), 2001. Guidance Document on Regulatory Testing and Risk Assessment procedures for Plant Protection Products with Non-Target; Arthropods. ESCORT 2.