Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fenoxycarb

EFSA Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

fenoxycarb; insecticide; peer review; pesticide; risk assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85078377649     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1779     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Netherlands, 2007. Draft Assessment Report (DAR) on the active substance fenoxycarb prepared by the rapporteur Member State the Netherlands in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, June 2007.
2. Netherlands, 2009. Additional Report to the Draft Assessment Report on the active substance fenoxycarb prepared by the rapporteur Member State the Netherlands in the framework of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, December 2009.
3. Netherlands, 2010. Final Addendum to the Additional Report on fenoxycarb, compiled by EFSA, August 2010.
4. European Commission, 2003. Guidance document on assessment of the relevance of metabolites in groundwater of substances regulated under council directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/221/2000-rev 10-final, 25 February 2003.
5. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on the Science behind the Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for birds and mammals (EFSA journal 2008 734:1–181).
6. FOCUS (2001). “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp.
7. FOCUS (2007). “Landscape And Mitigation Factors In Aquatic Risk Assessment. Volume 1. Extended Summary and Recommendations”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0. 169 pp.
8. FOCUS (2000). “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances”. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002.
9. EFSA (2007). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. The EFSA Journal (2007) 622, 1–32.
10. EFSA (2004). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request of EFSA related to FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of groundwater contamination. The EFSA Journal (2004) 93, 1–20.
11. European Commission, 2001. Guidelines on comparability, extrapolation, group tolerances and data requirements for setting MRLs. SANCO Doc 7525/VI/95-rev.7. pp.1–31.