Trickle: Rate limiting YouTube video streaming

Proceedings of the 2012 USENIX Annual Technical Conference, USENIX ATC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 191-196

  Ghobadi, Monia ^a,b   Cheng, Yuchung ^b   Jain, Ankur ^b   Mathis, Matt ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b GOOGLE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

CONGESTION WINDOW; LOSS RATES; PRODUCTION DATA; RATE LIMITING; ROUND-TRIP TIME; SERVER SIDES; UPPER BOUND; VIDEO BUFFER;

VIDEO STREAMING;

EID: 85077135552     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Sandvine global Internet report, Oct. 2011.
2. ALCOCK, S., AND NELSON, R. Application flow control in YouTube video streams. CCR 41 (April 2011), 24-30.
3. ALLMAN, M., AND BLANTON, E. Notes on burst mitigation for transport protocols. CCR (Apr. 2005), 53-60.
4. ALLMAN, M., EDDY, W. M., AND OSTERMANN, S. Estimating loss rates with TCP. SIGMETRICS 31 (December 2003), 12-24.
5. ALLMAN, M., PAXSON, V., AND BLANTON, E. TCP congestion control, September 2009. RFC 5681.
6. ASHWIN, R., ARNAUD, L., YEON, L., DON, T., CHADI, B., AND WALID, D. Network characteristics of video streaming traffic. CoNEXT (Dec. 2011), 1-12.
7. BLANTON, E., AND ALLMAN, M. On the impact of bursting on TCP performance. PAM (March 2005), 1-12.
8. DUKKIPATI, N., MATHIS, M., CHENG, Y., AND GHOBADI, M. Proportional rate reduction for TCP. IMC (November 2011), 155-170.
9. DUKKIPATI, N., REFICE, T., CHENG, Y., CHU, J., HERBERT, T., AGARWAL, A., JAIN, A., AND SUTIN, N. An argument for increasing TCP's initial congestion window. CCR 40 (2010), 26-33.
10. GHOBADI, M., CHENG, Y., JAIN, A., AND MATHIS, M. Trickle: Rate limiting YouTube video streaming. Tech. rep., Google Inc., January 2012. https://developers.google.com/speed/protocols/trickletech-report.pdf.
11. GRINNEMO, K., AND BRUNSTROM, A. Impact of traffic load on SCTP failovers in SIGTRAN. ICN (2005), 774-783.
12. HA, S., RHEE, I., AND XU, L. CUBIC: a new TCP-friendly high-speed TCP variant. SIGOPS'08 42, 64-74.
13. HANDLEY, M., PADHYE, J., AND FLOYD, S. TCP congestion window validation, June 2000. RFC 6298.
14. JIANG, H., AND DOVROLIS, C. Source-level IP packet bursts: causes and effects. IMC (October 2003), 301-306.
15. KARANDIKAR, S., KALYANARAMAN, S., BAGAL, P., AND PACKER, B. TCP rate control. CCR 30 (January 2000), 45-58.
16. LOMBARDO, A., PANARELLO, C., AND SCHEMBRA, G. Applying active window management for jitter control and loss avoidance in video streaming over TCP connections. IEEE Globecom (December 2010), 1-6.
17. MOHAMMAD, R., AND ANNA, B. On the Effectiveness of PR-SCTP in Networks with Competing Traffic. ISCC (2011), 898-905.
18. MOK, R., CHAN, E., AND CHANG, R. Measuring the quality of experience of HTTP video streaming. IFIP (May 2011), 485-492.
19. PRASAD, R., JAIN, M., AND DOVROLIS, C. Socket buffer auto-sizing for high-performance data transfers. Journal of GRID computing 1, 4 (2004), 361-376.
20. SEMKE, J., MAHDAVI, J., AND MATHIS, M. Automatic TCP buffer tuning. CCR 28 (October 1998), 315-323.
21. SPRING, N., CHESIRE, M., BERRYMAN, M., SAHASRANAMAN, V., ANDERSON, T., AND BERSHAD, B. Receiver based management of low bandwidth access links. INFOCOM (March 2000), 245-254.
22. TAHT, D., GETTYS, J., AND TURNER, S. The bufferbloat problem, 2011. http://www.bufferbloat.net/.
23. ZHANG, L., SHENKER, S., AND CLARK, D. Observations on the dynamics of a congestion control algorithm: The effects of two-way traffic. CCR 21 (August 1991), 133-147.