Perceptual factors in stereoscopic displays the effect of stereoscopic filming parameters on perceived quality and reported eye-strain

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 3299, Issue , 1998, Pages 282-291

  Ijsselsteijna, W A ^a   De Ridder, H ^a   Hamberg, R ^a  

^a Institute for Perception Research Eindhoven   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Perceived quality; Stereoscopic displays; Stereoscopic filming parameters; Subjective eye strain

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY DEVICES; STRAIN RATE;

EYE STRAIN; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; PERCEIVED QUALITY; STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY; STEREOSCOPIC FILMING PARAMETERS; STEREOSCOPIC PRESENTATIONS; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS; SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCES;

STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 85076726939     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: 1996756X     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.320119     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Beldie, I. P. & Kost, B. (1991). Luminance asymmetry in stereo TV images. Proceedings ofthe SPIE, vol. 1457: Stereoscopic Displays and Applications II, 242-247.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory ofhuman image understanding. Pscyhological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. Davis, E. T. & Hodges, L. F. (1995). Human stereopsis, fusion, and stereoscopic virtual environments. In: W. Barfield and TA. Furness III (Eds. ), Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Duwaer, A. L. & Van den Brink, G. (1981). What is the diplopia threshold? Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 295-309.
5. Fedorovskaya, E. A. , De Ridder, H. & Blommaert, F. J. J. (1997). Chroma variations and perceived quality of color images of natural scenes. Color: Research and Application 22, 96-110.
6. Fournier, J. (1995). Etude de la Qualite Visuelle des Images Stereoscopiques en Television [Study ofthe Visual Quality ofStereoscopic Imagesfor Television]. PhD. Thesis, University of Rennes.
7. Hendrix, C. & Barfield, W. (1995). Relationship between monocular and binocular depth cues forjudgements of spatial information and spatial instrument design. Displays 16, 103-i 13.
8. Howard, I. P. & Rogers, B. J. (1995). Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Inoue, T. & Ohzu, H. (1990). Accommodation and convergence when looking at binocular 3D images. In: K. Noro and O. Brown (Eds. ) Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management-Ill. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.
10. Janssen, T. J. W. M. & Blommaert, F. J. J. (1997). Image quality semantics. Journal ofimaging Science and Technology 41, 555-560.
11. Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Motoki, T. , Isono, H. & Yuyama, I. (1995). Present status of three-dimensional television research. Proceedings of the iEEE, 83, 1009-1021.
13. Ohzu, H. & Habara, K. (1996). Behind the scenes of virtual reality: Vision and motion. Proceedings ofthe IEEE 84, 782-798.
14. Ridder, H. de (1996). Naturalness and image quality: Saturation and lightness variation in color images of natural scenes. Journal ofimaging Science and Technology, 40, 487-493.
15. Ridder, H. de, Blommaert, F. J. J. & Fedorovskaya, E. A. (1995). Naturalness and image quality: Chroma and hue variations in color images of natural scenes. Proceedings ofthe SPIE, vol. 2411: Human Vision, Visual Processing, and DigitalDisplay Vi, 51-61.
16. Ridder, H. de, Fedorovskaya, E. A. & Blommaert, F. J. J. (1993). Naturalness and image quality: chroma variation in colour images of natural scenes. IPO Annual Progress Report, 28, 89-95.
17. Roufs, J. A. J. (1992). Perceptual image quality: Concept and measurement. Philips Journal ofResearch, 47, 35-62.
18. Schor, C. M. & Tyler, C. W. (1981). Spatio-Temporal properties of Panum's fusional area. Vision Research, 21, 683-692.
19. Tyler, C. W. (1983). Sensory processing of binocular disparity. In: C. M. Schor and K. J. Ciuffreda (Eds. ), Vergence Eye Movements: Basic and Clinical Aspects. Butterworths.
20. Wann, J. P. & Mon-Williams, M. (1997). Health issues with virtual reality displays: What we do know and what we don't. Computer Graphics, May 1997.
21. Wichansky, AM. (1991). User benefit of visualization with 3D stereographic displays. Proceedings ofthe SPIE, vol. 1457. Stereoscopic Displays and Applications II, 267-271.
22. Wickens, C. D. , Merwin, D. H. & Lin, E. L. (1994). Implications of graphics enhancements for the visualization of scientific data: Dimensional integrality, stereopsis, motion, and mesh. Human Factors 36, 44-61.
23. Yano, S. & Yuyama, I. (1991). Stereoscopic HDTV: Experimental system and psychological effects. SMPTEJournal, 100, 14-18.