Structuring Doctor of Nursing Practice project courses to facilitate success and ensure rigor

Journal of Professional Nursing

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2020, Pages 206-211

  Buckley, Kathleen M ^a   Idzik, Shannon ^a   Bingham, Debra ^a   Windemuth, Brenda ^a   Bindon, Susan L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

Doctor of Nursing Practice; Doctor of Nursing Practice Project; Doctoral programs; Doctoral students; Graduate nursing education; Quality improvement

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; HUMAN; NURSING EDUCATION; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FACULTY, NURSING; HUMANS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SCHOOLS, NURSING;

EID: 85076568317     PISSN: 87557223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. American Association of Colleges in Nursing, The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. Retrieved from https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/Publications/DNPEssentials.pdf, 2006.
2. American Association of Colleges in Nursing, The Doctor of Nursing Practice: Current issues and clarifying recommendations: Report from the task force on implementation of the DNP. Retrieved from https://www.pncb.org/sites/default/files/2017-02/AACN_DNP_Recommendations.pdf, 2015.
3. Baily, M.A., Bottrell, M., Lynn, J., Jennings, Special report: The ethics of using QI methods to improve healthcare quality and safety. 2006, The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York.
4. Baker, K.M., Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process. Active Learning in Higher Education 17:3 (2016), 179–192, 10.1177/1469787416654794.
5. Brown, M.A., Crabtree, K., The development of practice scholarship in DNP programs: A paradigm shift. Journal of Professional Nursing 9:6 (2013), 330–337, 10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.08.003.
6. Center for Community Health and Development, Chapter 2, section 14: MAP-IT: A model for implementing Healthy People 2020. Retrieved from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/overview/models-for-community-health-and-development/map-it/main, 2019.
7. Damschroder, L.J., Aron, D.C., Keith, R.E., Kirsh, S.R., Alexander, J.A., Lowery, J.C., Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(50), 2009, 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 Retrieved from https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
8. Nilsen, P., Making sense of implementation theories, frameworks, and models. Implementation Science 10:53 (2015), 1–13, 10.1186/s13012-015-0242 Retrieved from https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
9. Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 31:1 (2016), 1–8, 10.7812/TPP/15-141 Retrieved from https://journals.lww.com/jncqjournal/Fulltext/2016/01000/SQUIRE_2_0__Standards_for_QUality_Improvement.1.aspx.
10. Ogrinc, G., Nelson, W.A., Adams, S.M., O'Hara, A.E., An instrument to differentiate between clinical research and quality improvement. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35:5 (2013), 1–8.