Telex: Anticensorship in the network infrastructure

Proceedings of the 20th USENIX Security Symposium

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 459-473

  Wustrow, Eric ^a   Wolchok, Scott ^a   Goldberg, Ian ^b   Halderman, J Alex ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYPTOGRAPHIC SCHEMES; ELLIPTIC CURVE; INTERNET ACCESS; INTERNET CENSORSHIP; NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE; NEW APPROACHES; PASSIVE AND ACTIVE ATTACKS; PROOF OF CONCEPT;

WEBSITES;

EID: 85075948939     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. ab: Apache benchmark. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/ programipsets/ab.html.
2. Alexa top sites. http://www.alexa.com/topsites.
3. BERNSTEIN, D. J. Curve25519: New Diffie-Hellman speed records. Public Key Cryptography-PKC 2006 (2006), 207-228.
4. BONEH, D. The decision Diffie-Hellman problem. Algorithmic Number Theory (1998), 48-63.
5. BONEH, D. J., GENTRY, C., LYNN, B., AND SHACHAM, H. Aggregate and Verifiably Encrypted Signatures from Bilinear Maps. In Proceedings of Advances in Cryptography - Eurocrypt 2003 (May 2003), pp. 416-432.
6. DANEZIS, G., AND ANDERSON, R. The economics of censorship resistance. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Workship on Economics and Information Security (WEIS04) (May 2004).
7. DANEZIS, G., AND DIAZ, C. Survey of anonymous communication channels. Computer Communications 33 (Mar. 2010).
8. DIERKS, T., AND RESCORLA, E. The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2. RFC 5246 (Proposed Standard), Aug. 2008. Updated by RFCs 5746, 5878.
9. DINGLEDINE, R. Strategies for getting more bridge addresses. https://blog.torproject.org/blog/strategies-getting-morebridge-addresses, May 2011.
10. DINGLEDINE, R., MATHEWSON, N., AND SYVERSON, P. Tor: The second-generation onion router. In Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Security Symposium (Aug. 2004).
11. DOUCEUR, J. R. The Sybil attack. In Proc. International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS) (2002), pp. 251-260.
12. Dynaweb proxy. http://www.dit-inc.us/dynaweb.
13. FEAMSTER, N., BALAZINSKA, M., HARFST, G., BALAKRISHNAN, H., AND KARGER, D. Infranet: Circumventing web censorship and surveillance. In Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Security Symposium (Aug. 2002).
14. FEAMSTER, N., BALAZINSKA, M., WANG, W., BALAKRISHNAN, H., AND KARGER, D. Thwarting web censorship with untrusted messenger discovery. In Privacy Enhancing Technologies (2003), Springer, pp. 125-140.
15. GLOBAL INTERNET FREEDOM CONSORTIUM. The Great Firewall revealed. http://www.internetfreedom.org/files/WhitePaper/ ChinaGreatFirewallRevealed.pdf.
16. GLOBAL INTERNET FREEDOM CONSORTIUM. Defeat internet censorship: Overview of advanced technologies and products. http://www.internetfreedom.org/archive/Defeat_Internet_ Censorship_White_Paper.pdf, Nov. 2007.
17. GOH, E.-J., BONEH, D., GOLLE, P., AND PINKAS, B. The Design and Implementation of Protocol-based Hidden Key Recovery. In Proceedings of the 6th Information Security Conference (Oct. 2003), pp. 165-179.
18. HINTZ, A. Fingerprinting websites using traffic analysis. In Privacy Enhancing Technologies, R. Dingledine and P. Syverson, Eds., vol. 2482 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2003, pp. 229-233.
19. IP sets. http://ipset.netfilter.org/.
20. JUELS, A., AND BRAINARD, J. Client puzzles: A cryptographic countermeasure against connection depletion attacks. In Proceedings of the 1999 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS) (Feb. 1999).
21. LYON, G. Nmap Network Scanning. Nmap Project, 2009, ch. Chapter 8: Remote OS Detection.
22. MURDOCH, S. J., AND DANEZIS, G. Low-cost traffic analysis of tor. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP05) (2005).
23. PAXSON, V. Bro: A system for detecting network intruders in real time. Computer Networks 31 (1999), 2435-2463.
24. PETERSON, L., ANDERSON, T., CULLER, D., AND ROSCOE, T. A Blueprint for Introducing Disruptive Technology into the Internet. In Proceedings of HotNets-I (Princeton, New Jersey, October 2002).
25. Squid HTTP proxy. http://www.squid-cache.org/.
26. STEIN, W., AND JOYNER, D. Sage: System for algebra and geometry experimentation. ACM SIGSAM Bulletin 39, 2 (2005), 61-64.
27. THE TOR PROJECT. Tor: Bridges. https://www.torproject.org/ docs/bridges.
28. THE TOR PROJECT. New blocking activity from Iran. https:// blog.torproject.org/blog/new-blocking-activity-iran, Jan. 2011.
29. Transparent proxy support documentation. http://lxr.linux.no/ #linux+v2.6.37/Documentation/networking/tproxy.txt, Jan. 2011.
30. UltraSurf proxy. http://www.ultrareach.com/.
31. VALLENTIN, M., SOMMER, R., LEE, J., LERES, C., PAXON, V., AND TIERNEY, B. The NIDS cluster: Scalable, stateful network intrusion detection on commodity hardware. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID '07) (Sept. 2007), pp. 107-126.
32. WATERS, B., JUELS, A., HALDERMAN, J. A., AND FELTEN, E. W. New client puzzle outsourcing techniques for DoS resistance. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS 2004) (Oct. 2004).
33. WOLCHOK, S., YAO., R., AND HALDERMAN, J. A. Analysis of the Green Dam Censorware System. Computer Science and Engineering Division, University of Michigan 18 (2009).