Sword and shield: The wto dispute settlement system and Japan

Japan's Managed Globalization: Adapting to the Twenty-first Century

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 77-100

  Pekkanen, Saadia M ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85075295963     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315703114-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. ACCJ (American Chamber of Commerce in Japan). 1997. Making Trade Talks Work: Lessons from Recent History. Tokyo: ACCJ.
2. Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1990. “Aggressive Unilateralism: An Overview.” In Jagdish Bhagwati and Hugh T. Patrick, eds., Aggressive Unilateralism: America's 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System, pp. 1---45. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
3. Chayes, Abram, and Antonia H. Chayes. 1993. “On Compliance.” International Organization 47 (2): 175-205.
4. DSU (Understanding On Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes). 1994. Annex 2, WTO Agreement.
5. GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade). GATT Activities (GA). Various issues.
6. GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade). Basic Instrument and Selected Documents (BISD). Various issues.
7. Hudec, Robert E. 1992. “The Judicialization of GATT Dispute Settlement.” In Michael M. Hart and Debra P. Steger, eds., In Whose Interest? Due Process and Transparency in International Trade, pp. 9---43. Canada: Centre for Trade Policy and Law.
8. Hudec, Robert E. 1993. Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. Salem, NH: Buttersworth Legal.
9. Jackson, John. 1995. “The World Trade Organization: Watershed Innovation or Cautious Small Step Forward?” The World Economy: 11-27.
10. Jackson, John. 1997. “The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Misunderstanding on the Nature of Legal Obligation.” American Journal of International Law 91 (1): 60-64.
11. Jackson, John. 1998a. “Designing and Implementing Effective Dispute Settlement Procedures: WTO Dispute Settlement, Appraisal and Prospects.” In Anne O. Krueger, ed., The WTO as an International Organization, pp. 161-80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Jackson, John. 1998b. The World Trade Organization: Constitution and Jurisprudence. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
13. Keohane, Robert O. 1992. “Compliance With International Commitments: Politics Within a Framework of Law.” Panel Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law. Washington, DC: ASIL.
14. Komatsu, Ichiro. 1992. “Japan and the GATT Dispute-Settlement Rules and Procedures.” Japanese Annual of International Law 35: 33-61.
15. Lincoln, Edward J. 1999. Troubled Times: U.S.-lapan Trade Relations in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16. Palmeter, David, and Petros C. Mavroidis. 1998. “The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law.” American Journal of International Law 92 (3): 398-413.
17. Pekkanen, Saadia M. 2001a. “Aggressive Legalism: The Rules of the WTO and Japan's Emerging Trade Strategy.” The World Economy 24 (5): 707-37.
18. Pekkanen, Saadia M. 2001b. “International Law, the WTO, and the Japanese State: Assessment and Implications of the New Legalized Trade Politics.” Journal of Japanese Studies 27 (1): 41-79.
19. Pekkanen, Saadia M. Forthcoming. “At Play in the Legal Realm: The WTO and the Changing Nature ofU.S.-Japan Antidumping Disputes.” In Ellis Krauss and T.J. Pempel, eds., Beyond Bilateralism (under review).
20. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. 1998. The GATTIWTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement. London: Kluwer Law International.
21. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. 1999. “International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System 1948-1996: An Introduction.” In Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, ed., International Trade Law and the GATTIWTO Dispute Settlement System, pp. 5-122. London: Kluwer Law International.
22. Schott, Jeffrey J. 1994. The Uruguay Round: An Assessment. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
23. WTO (World Trade Organization). Report of the Appellate Body (AB). Various cases.
24. WTO (World Trade Organization). Report of the Panel (PA). Various cases.