Making an impact: A handbook on counselor advocacy

Making an Impact: A Handbook on Counselor Advocacy

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-172

  Eriksen, Karen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85074903289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203768105     Document Type: Book

References (203)

1. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 (4) (1946).
2. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1) (1946).
3. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5 706 (1946).
4. Advocacy Institute (1990). The elements ofa successfUl public interest advocacy campaign. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The sense of civic competence. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in jive nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. American Counseling Association. (1992). 21 steps in a successfUl legislative process: A fact sheet. Alexandria, VA: Author.
7. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
8. American School Counselor Association. (1981). Organizing for action: Ideas for mobilizing resources on behalf of elementary guidance (2nd ed.). Falls Church, VA: Author.
9. Armstrong, V. C., & Johnson, C. A. (1982). Certiorari decisions by the Warren and Burger courts: Is cue theory time bound? Polity, 15(1), 141-150.
10. Baker, S. B., Swisher, J. D., Nadenicheck, P. E., & Popowicz, C. L. (1984). Measured effects of primary prevention strategies. The Personnel and Guidance Journal 62(8), 459-464.
11. Bauer, R. A., de Sola Pool, I., & Dexter, L.A. (1963). American business and public policy: The politics offoreign trade. New York: Atherton.
12. Belton, R. (1978). A comparative review of public and private enforcement of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Vanderbilt Law Review, 31, 905-961.
13. Bentley, A. F. (1967). The process ofgovernment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
14. Berry, J. M. (1977). Lobbying for the people. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Berry, J. M. (1989a). The interest group society. New York: HarperCollins.
16. Berry, J. M. (1989b). Subgovernments, issue networks, and political conflict. In R. A. Harris and S.M. Milkis (Eds.), Remaking American politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17. Birnbaum, J. H. (1992). The lobbyists: How influence peddlers get their way in Washington. New York: Time Books.
18. Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
19. Blake, R. R., Shepard, H. A., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). Managing intergroup conflict in irubmry. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
20. Bobrow, D. B., & Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Policy analysis by design. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
21. Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Bone, H. A. (1958). Political parties and pressure group politics. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 319, 73-83.
23. Borders, L. D., & Drury, S. M. (1992). Comprehensive school counseling programs: A review for policy makers and practitioners. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70(4), 487-498.
24. Braun, C. (1976). Teacher expectation: Sociopsychological dynamics. Review of Educational Research, 46(2), 185-213. 371 U.S. § 429-430 (1963).
25. Brigman, G., & Moore, P. (1994). School counselors and censorship: Facing the challenge. Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor Association.
26. Browne, W. P. (1986). Policy and interests: Instability and change in a classic issue subsystem. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), lnterest group politics (pp. 183-201). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
27. Browne, W. P. (1988). Private interests, public policy, and American agriculture. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
28. Browne, W. P. (1995). Organized interests, grassroots confidants, and Congress. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed.) (pp. 281-317). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
29. Burke, R. J. (1970). Methods of resolving superior-subordinate conflict: The constructive use of subordinate differences and disagreements. Organiwtional Behavior and Human Performance, 5(4), 393-411.
30. Caine, R., & Caine, G. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
31. Caldeira, G. A., & Wright, J. R. (1988). Organized interests and agenda setting in the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1109-1127.
32. Carledge, G., & Milburn, J. F. (1978). The case for teaching social skills in the clas5room: A review. Review of Educational Research, 48(1), 133-156.
33. Carp, R. A., & Rowland, C. K. (1983). Policymaking arul politics in the federal district courts. Knoxville: University of Tennessee.
34. Cigler, A. J. (1986). From protest group to interest group: The making of the American agriculture movement. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 46-69). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
35. Cigler, A. J., & Loomis, B. A. (1995). Contemporary interest-group politics: More than "more of the same." In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed.) (pp. 393-406). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
36. Clark, P. B., & Wilson, J. Q. (1961). Incentive systems: A theory of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6(2), 129-166.
37. Cobb, H. D., & Richards, H. C. (1983). Efficacy of counseling services in decreasing behavior problems of elementary school children. Elementary School Guidance arul Counseling, 17(3), 180-187.
38. Conway, M. M. (1986). PACs and Congressional elections in the 1980s. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 70-90). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
39. Conway, M. M., & Green, J. C. (1995). In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed.) (pp. 155-173). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
40. Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1979). The formation and persistence of attitudes that support intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 149-159). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
41. Coopersmith, S. (1981). The antecedents of self-esteem. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
42. Cortner, R. C. (1968). Strategies and tactics of litigants in constiMional cases. Journal of Public Law, 17, 287-307.
43. Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. New York: Free Press.
44. Coser, L.A. (1967). Continuities in the study of social co'nflict. New York: Free Press.
45. Costain, W. D., & Costain, A. N. (1981). Interest groups as policy aggregators in the legislative process. Polity, 14(2), 249-272.
46. Council of State Governments (1990). The book of the States 1990-1991. Lexington, KY: Author.
47. Cowan, R. B. (1977). Women's rights through litigation: An examination of the American Civil Liberties Union Women's Rights Project, 1971-1976. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 8, 373-412.
48. Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.
49. Deffenbacker, J. L., & Kemper, C. C. (1974). Counseling test-anxious sixth graders. Elementary School Guidance arul Counseling, 9(1), 22-29.
50. DeGregorio, C., & Rossotti, J. E. (1995). Campaigning for the court: Interest group participation in the Bork and Thomas confirmation processes. In A. J. Cigler and B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest Group Politics (4th ed.) (pp. 215-238). Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
51. De Tocqueville, A. (1969). Democracy in America (J.P. Mayer, Ed.) Garden City, NY: Doubleday. (Original work published 1835)
52. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of co'nflict. New Haven: Yale University.
53. Epstein, L. (1985). Conservatives in court. Knoxville: University of Tennessee.
54. Epstein, L. (1991). Courts and interest groups. In J. B. Gates and C. A. Johnson (Eds.), The American Courts: A Critical Assessment (pp. 335-371). Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
55. Epstein, L., & Rowland, C. K. (1985). Debunking the myth of interest group invincibility in the courts. American Political Science Review, 85, 205-217.
56. Evans, C. L., & Oleszek, W. J. (1995). Reform redux: Jurisdictional change and the new Republican bouse. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 6-8, 1995.
57. Evans, D. M. (1986). PAC contributions and role-call voting: Conditional power. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 114-132). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
58. Fiorina, M. (1982). Legislative choice of regulatory forms: Legal process or administrative process. Public Choice, 39, 33-66.
59. Folger, J. P., & Poole, M. S. (1984). Working through conflict: A communication perspective. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
60. Folger, I. P., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (1993). Working through conflict: Strategies for relationships, groups, and organizations. New York: HarperCollins.
61. Follett, M. P. (1940). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (H. C. Metcalf and L. Urwick, Eds.). New York: HarperCollins.
62. Foreman, C. H. (1995). Grassroots victim organizations: Mobilizing for personal and public health. In A. I. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed.) (pp. 33-53). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
63. Galanter, M. (1974). Why the "haves" come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law and Society Review, 9, 95-151.
64. Garment, S. (1994). The buck stopped with her. Washington Post, March 20.
65. Gerler, E. R. (1980). A longitudinal study of multimodal approaches to small group psychological education. The School Counselor; 27(3), 184-190.
66. Gerler, E. R. (1985). Elementary school counseling research and the classroom learning environment. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 20(1), 39-48.
67. Gerler, E. R., & Anderson, R. F. (1986). The effects of classroom guidance on children's success in school. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65(2), 78-81.
68. Gibb, J. R. (1961). Defensive communication. Journal of Communication, 11 (3), 141-148.
69. Gibson, J. L. (1983). From simplicity to complexity: The development of theory in the study of judicial behavior. Political Behavior; 5(1), 7-49.
70. Gilchrist, L. A., & Stringer, M. (1992). Marketing counseling: Guidelines for training and practice. Counselor Education and Supervision, 31, 154-162.
71. Ginger, A. F. (1963). Litigation as a form of political action. Wayne Law Review, 9, 458-483.
72. Glaser, W. (1969). Schools without failure. New York: Harper and Row.
73. Glick, H. R. (1990). Courts in American politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
74. Glosoff, H. L., & Koprovicz, C. L. (1990). Children achieving potentiaL Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development and the National Conference of State Legislatures.
75. Green, M. (1982, December 13). Political PAC-Man. The New Republic, pp. 18-25.
76. Green, R. L. (1988). Image-building activities for the elementary school counselor. Elementary School Guidance &c Counseling, 22(3), 186-191.
77. Greenberg, J. (1973). Litigation for social change: Methods, limits and role in democracy. Thirtieth Annual Benjamin N. Cardozo Lecture delivered before the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.
78. Godwin, R. K. (1992). Money, technology, and political interests: The direct marketing of politics. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. 308-325). Boulder, CO: Westview.
79. Gurney, P. (1987). Self-esteem enhancement in children: A review of research findings. Educational Research, 29(2), 130-136.
80. Hakman, N. (1969). The Supreme Court's political environment: The processing of noncommercial litigation. In J. B. Grossman & J. Tananhaus (Eds.), Frontiers ofjudicial research. New York: Wtley, 199-253.
81. Hall, J. (1986). Conflict management survey: A survey on one:S characteristic reaction to and handling of conflicts between himself and others. Woodlands, TX: Teleometrics International.
82. Hawes, L. C., & Smith, D. H. (1973). A critique of assumptions underlying the study of communication in conflict. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59(4), 423-435.
83. Hayes, M. T. (1986). The new group universe. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 133-145). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
84. Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87-124). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
85. Heinz, J. P., Laumann, E. O., Nelson, R. L., & Salisbury, R. H. (1993). The hollow core: Private interests in national policy malcing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86. Hendrix, J. A. (1992). Public relations cases (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
87. Hocker, J. L., & WJlmont, W. W. (1991).1nterpersonal conflict. Dubuque, lA: Brown.
88. Hoge, R. D., & Luce, S. (1979). Predicting academic achievement from classroom behavior. Review of Educational Research, 49(3), 479-496.
89. Hook, J. (1989, December 16). New law leaves loopholes for benefits to members. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, pp. 3420-3424.
90. Howard, J. W. (1981). Courts of appeals in the federal judicial system. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
91. Hula, K. W. (1994, September). Bedfellows and policy preferences: Interest group coalitions in national politics. Paper presented at the 1994 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, The New York Hilton.
92. Hula, K. W. (1995a). Rounding up the usual suspects: Forging interest group coalitions in Washington. In A. J. Cigler and B. A. Loomis (Eds.), lnterest group politics (pp. 239-258). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
93. Hula, K. W. (1995b). Saddling up the posse: Rounding up coalitions in the Washington corral. A paper presented at the 1995 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Tihe Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL.
94. Huntington, S. P. (1975). The democratic distemper. Public Interest, 41, 9-38.
95. Janda, K., Berry, J. M., & Goldman, J. (1992). The challenge of democracy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
96. Jones, R. E., & White, C. S. (1985). Relationships among personality, conflict resolution styles, and task effectiveness. Group and Organization Studies, 10(2), 152-167.
97. Kerwin, C. M. (1994). Rulemaking: How government agencies write law and make policy. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
98. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: HarperCollins.
99. Kobylka, J. F. (1987). A court-created context for group litigation: Libertarian groups and obscenity. Journal of Politics, 49, 1061-1078.
100. Kornhauser, W. (1959). The politics of mass society. New York: Free Press.
101. Krislov, S. (1963). The amicus curiae brief: From friendship to advocacy. Yale Law Journal, 72, 694-721.
102. Latham, E. (1952). The group basis of politics: Notes for a theory. American Political Science Review, 46(2), 376-397.
103. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business School, Division of Research.
104. Lax, D., & Sebenius, J. (1986). The manager as negotiator. New York: Free Press.
105. Lempert, R., & Sanders, J. (1986). An invitation to law and social science: Desert, disputes and distribution. New York: Longman.
106. Levine, C. H., & Thurber, J. A. (1986). Reagan and the intergovernmental lobby: Iron triangles, cozy subsystems, and political conflict. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), lnterest group politics (pp. 202-220). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
107. Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of "muddling through." In J. M. Shafritz and A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of Public Administration (3rd ed.) (pp. 224-235). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
108. Linzer, L. (1988). How to use research to get publicity. Public Relations Journal, 44(12), 29-31.
109. Lipsky, M. (1968). Protest as a political resource. American Political Science Review, 62(4), 1144-1158.
110. Loomis, B. A. (1986). Coalitious of interests: Building bridges in the balkanized state. In A. J. Cigler and B. A. Loomis (Ed.), lnterest group politics (pp. 258-274). Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
111. Loomis, B. A., & Cigler, A. J. (1986).1ntroduction: The changing nature of interest group politics. In A. J. Cigler and B. A. Loomis (Eds.), lnterest group politics (pp. 1-26). Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
112. Loomis, B. A., & Sexton, E. (1995). Choosing to advertise: How interests decide. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), lnterest group politics (4th ed) (pp. 193-214). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
113. Luttberg, N. R., & Zeigler, H. (1966). Attitude consensus and conflict in an interest group: An assessment of cohesion. American Political Science Review, 60(3), 655-666.
114. Madison, J. (1987). The Federalist, No. 10.1n G. Wihhs (Ed.), The federalist popers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay (pp. 42-49). New York: Bantam. (Original work published 1787)
115. Mann, T. E. (1990). A question of balance: The president, the Congress and foreign policy. Washington, DC: Brookings.
116. Mansbridge, J. J. (1992). A deliberative theory of interest representation. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. 32-57). Boulder, CO: Westview.
117. Maraniss, D. (1983, June 26). Competing interests snarl gas debate. The Washington Post, pp. A-1, A-14.
118. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Relations among dimensions of self-attribution, dimensions of self-concept, and academic achievements. Journal ofEducational Psychowgy, 76(6), 1291-1308.
119. McCool, D. (1989). Subgovenunents and the impact of policy fragmentation and accommodation. Policy Studies Review, 8(4), 264-287.
120. McCubbins, M., & Schwartz, T. (1987). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alanns. American Journal ofPolitical Science, 28, 165-179.
121. McElreath, M.P., & Miller, P. W. (1991). Introduction to public relations and advertising: A reader from the consumer:S point of view. Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
122. McFarland, A. S. (1992). Interest groups and the policyrnaking process: Sources of COIltervailing power in America. In M.P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. 58-79). Boulder, CO: Westview.
123. Meltsner, M. (1973). Cruel and unusual punishment: The Supreme Coun and capital punishment. New York: Random House.
124. Mental Health Liaison Group. (1993). The time is now: The case for a comprehensive mental health benefit in health care reform. Washington, DC: Author.
125. Michels, R. (1958). Political porties: A sociowgical study of the oligarchical tendencies of modem democracy. New York: Free Press.
126. Milbrath, L. W. (1963). The Washington Lobbyists. Chicago: Rand McNally.
127. Miller, J. B. (1986). What do we mean by relationships? Work in Progress: Stone Center Working Paper Series #22. Wellesley, MA: Stone Center for Developmental Services and Studies.
128. Murray, J. S. (1986). Understanding competing theories of negotiation. Negotiation Jouma~ 2(2), 179-186.
129. Myers vs. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926).
130. Myrick, R. D. (1993). Devewpmental guidance and counseling: A practical approach (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Educational Media Corporation.
131. NAACP vs. Button, 371 U.S. 429 (1962).
132. Newland, C. A. (1959). Legal periodicals and the United States Supreme Court. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 3, 58-74.
133. Newsom, D., Scott, A., & Turk, J. V. (1993). This is PR: The realities ofpublic relations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
134. North, R. C., Brody, R. A., & Holsti, O. R. (1963). Some empirical data on the conflict spiral. Studies in International Conflict and Integration (pp. 1-14). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
135. O'Connor, K. (1980). Women:S organizations' use of the courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
136. O'Connor, K., & Epstein, L. (1981-1982). Amicus curiae participation in U.S. Supreme Court litigation: An appraisal of Hakman's "folklore." Law and Society Review, 16, 311-320.
137. O'Connor, K., & McFall, B. S. (1992). Conservative interest group litigation in the Reagan era and beyond. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. 263-281). Boulder, CO: Westview.
138. Oleszek, W. J. (1989). Congressional procedures and the policy making process. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
139. Olson, M. (1965). The wgic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
140. Orren, K. (1976). Standing to sue: Interest group conflict in the federal courts. American Political Science Review, 70(3), 723-741.
141. Peck, M.S. (1987). The different drum: Community making and peace. New York: Simon & Schuster.
142. Peltason, J. W. (1955). Federal courts in the political process. New York: Random House.
143. Peterson, M. A. (1992). Interest mobilization and the presidency. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. 221-241). Boulder, CO: Westview.
144. Petracca, M. P. (1992a). The future of an interest group society. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics ofinterests (pp. 345-361. Boulder, CO: Westview.
145. Petracca, M. P. (1992b). Introduction. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. xvii-xxv). Boulder, CO: Westview.
146. Petracca, M. P. (1992c). The rediscovery of interest group politics. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. 3-31). Boulder, CO: Westview.
147. Phillips, E., & Cheston, R. (1979). Conflict resolution: What works? California Management Review, 21(4), 76-83.
148. Public Health Services Act, U.S. C. § 303 .(d)(1).
149. Purkey, W. W. (1970). Self-concept and school achievement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
150. Putnam, L. L., & Folger, J. P. (1988). Communication, conflict and dispute resolution: The study of interaction and the development of conflict theory. Communication Research, 15, 349-359.
151. Richards, D. L. (1990). Building and managing your private practice. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
152. Rohde, D. W., & Spaeth, H. J. (1976). Supreme Court decision making. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
153. Sabatier, P. A. (1992). Interest gronp membership and organization: Multiple theories. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. 99-129). Boulder, CO: Westview.
154. Sabato, L. J. (1984). PAC power: Inside the world of political action committees. New York: Norton.
155. Salisbury, R. H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 1-32.
156. Salisbury, R. H. (1990). The paradox of interest gronps in Washington: More gronps, less clout. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 203-230). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
157. Salmon, C. T. (1990). God understands when the cause is noble. The Gannett Center Journal 4(2), 23-34.
158. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wmston.
159. Schlozman, K. W., & Tierney, J. T. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
160. Schrader, M. K. (1989). The image of the school counselor: Whose responsibility? The School Counselor; 36, 229-233.
161. Schubert, G. A. (1959). Quantitative analysis ofjudicial behavior. Glencoe, nLL: Free Press.
162. Schubert, G. A. (1965). The judicial mind: Attitudes and ideologies of Supreme Court justices 1946-1963. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
163. Seidel, J. V., Kjolseth, R., & Seymour, E. (1988). The ethnograph. [software manual]. Amherst, MA: Qualis Research Associates.
164. Seidman, H. (1980). Politics, position, and power: The dynamics offederal organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
165. Seitel, F. P. (1984). The practice of public relations. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
166. Shapiro, M. (1986). APA: Past, present and future. Virginia Law Review, 72, 452.
167. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). The robber's cave experiment: Intergroup conflict and cooperation. Norman: University of Oklahoma, Institute of Group Relations.
168. Simmell, G. (1955). Conflict (K. H. Wolff, Trans.). New York: Free Press.
169. Smith, D. G. (1964). Pragmatism and the group theory of politics. American Political Science Review, 58(3), 600-610.
170. Sorauf, F. J. (1976). The waU of separation: The constitutional politics of church and state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
171. Sorauf, F. J. (1995). Adaptation and innovation in political action committees. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (4th ed.) (pp. 175-192). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
172. Spaeth, H. J. (1963). Warren Court attitudes toward business: The "B" scale. In G. A. Schubert (Ed), Judicial decision-making (pp. 79-108). New York: Free Press.
173. Sweeney, T. J. (1992). Counselor credentialing: Purpose and origin. In F. O. Bradley (Ed.), Credentialing in counseling (pp. 1-12). Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development.
174. Tanenhaus, J., Schick, M., Muraskin, M., & Rosen, D. (1963). The Supreme Court's certiorari jurisdiction: Cue theory. In G. A. Schubert (Ed.)
175. Judicial decision-making (pp. 111-132). New York: Free Press.
176. Tarr, G. A. (1994). Judicial process and judicial polieymaking. St. Paul, MN: West.
177. Thomas, C. S., & Hrebenar, R. J. (1992). Changing patterns of interest gronp activity: A regional perspective. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. 150-174). Boulder, CO: Westview.
178. Tierney, J. T. (1992). Organized interests and the nation's capitol. In M.P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests, (pp. 201-220). Boulder, CO: Westview.
179. Truman, D. B. (1951). The governmental process. New York: Knopf.
180. Truman, D. B. (1971). The governmental process (2nd ed.). New York: Knopf.
181. Ulmer, S. S. (1983). Conflict with Supreme Court precedent and the granting of plenary review. Journal of Politics, 45, 474-478.
182. Ulmer, S. S. (1984). The Supreme Court's certiorari decisions: Conflict as a predictive variable. American Political Science Review, 78, 901-911.
183. Ubner, S. S., Hintze, W., & Kirklosky, L. (1972). The decision to grant or deny certiorari: Further consideration of cue theory. Law and Society Review, 6, 637-649.
184. Vose, C. E. (1949). Private attorneys-general: Group action in the fight for civil liberties. Yale Law Journal, 58, 574-598.
185. Vose, C. E. (1958). Litigation as a form· of pressure group politics. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 319, 20-31.
186. Vose, C. E. (1959). Caucasians only. Berkeley: University of California Press.
187. Vose, C. E. (1972). Constitutional change: Amendment politics and Supreme Court litigation since 1900. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
188. Walker, J. L. (1983). The origins and maintenance of interest groups in America. American Political Science Review, 77(2), 390-406.
189. Wall, V. D., Galanes, G. J., & Love, S. B. (1987). Small, task-oriented groups, conflict, conflict management, satisfaction, and decision quality. Small Group Behavior; 18(1), 31-55.
190. Walton, R. (1969). Interpersonal peacemaking: Confrontations and third party consultation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
191. Wehlage, G. G., & Rutter, R. A. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem? Teachers College Record, 87(3), 374-392.
192. Weldon vs. Virginia State Board of Psychologist Examiners, 1972.
193. Whitmont, E. C. (1986). Return of the goddess. New York: Crossroads.
194. Wilmot, W. W. (1987). Dyadic communication (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
195. Wilson, G. K. (1992). American interest groups in comparative perspective. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. 80-95). Boulder, CO: Westview.
196. Wilson, G. K. (1986). American business and politics. In A. J. Cigler & B. A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 221-235). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
197. Wirth, S. (1977). Effects of a multifaceted reading program on self-concept. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 12(1), 33-40.
198. Wittenberg, E., & Wittenberg, E. (1989). How to win in Washington. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
199. Wohlford, P., Myers, H. F., & Callan, J. E. (Eds.) (1993). Serving the seriously mentally ill: Public-academic linkages in services, research, and training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
200. Wolpe, B. C. (1990). Lobbying Congress: How the system works. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
201. Wright, C. R., & Hyman, H. H. (1958). Voluntary association member ship in American adults: Evidence from national sample surveys. American Sociological Review, 23, cited
202. B. H. Zisk (1969). American political interest groups: Readings in theory and research. Behnont, CA: Wadsworth.
203. Zisk, B. H. (1969). American political interest groups: Readings in theory and research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.