What difference does quantity make? On the epistemology of Big Data in biology

Big Data and Society

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Leonelli, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Big Data epistemology; biology; data curation; data infrastructures; data intensive science; databases; model organisms

Indexed keywords

EID: 85074212962     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20539517     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2053951714534395     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ankeny R, Leonelli S, (in press) Valuing data in postgenomic biology: How data donation and curation practices challenge the scientific publication system. In: Stevens H, Richardson S, (eds) PostGenomics, Durham: Duke University Press.
2. Baker KS, Millerand F, (2010) Infrastructuring ecology: Challenges in achieving data sharing. In: Parker JN, Vermeulen N, Penders B, (eds) Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, Farnham, UK: Ashgate, pp. 111–138.
3. Bastow R, Leonelli S, (2010) Sustainable digital infrastructure. EMBO Reports 11(10): 730–735.
4. Bauer S, (2008) Mining data, gathering variables, and recombining information: The flexible architecture of epidemiological studies. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39: 415–426.
5. Bechtel W (2006) Discovering Cell Mechanisms: The Creation of Modern Cell Biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bogen J (2013) Theory and observation in science. In: Zalta EN (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/science-theory-observation/ (accessed 20 February 2014).
7. Borgman CL, (2007) Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Bowker GC, (2001) Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science 30(5): 643–684.
9. Bowker GC, (2006) Memory Practices in the Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Craver CF, Darden L, (2013) In Search of Biological Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Davies G, Frow E, Leonelli S, (2013) Bigger, faster, better? Rhetorics and practices of large-scale research in contemporary bioscience. BioSocieties 8(4): 386–396.
12. Denzin N (2006) Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.
13. Dupré J, (2012) Processes of Life, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Edwards PN, (2010) A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Edwards PN, Mayernik MS, Batcheller AL, (2011) Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration. Social Studies of Science 41(5): 667–690.
16. Gitelman L, (2013) ‘Raw Data’ is an Oxymoron, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Hacking I, (1992) The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. In: Pickering A, (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 29–64.
18. Harvey M, McMeekin A, (2007) Public or Private Economics of Knowledge? Turbulence in the Biological Sciences, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
19. Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K, (2009) The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery, Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research.
20. Hilgartner S, (1995) Biomolecular databases: New communication regimes for biology? Science Communication 17: 240–263.
21. Hilgartner S, (2013) Constituting large-scale biology: Building a regime of governance in the early years of the Human Genome Project. BioSocieties 8: 397–416.
22. Hine C, (2006) Databases as scientific instruments and their role in the ordering of scientific work. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 269–298.
23. Johnson K, (2012) Ordering Life: Karl Jordan and the Naturalist Tradition, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Kelty CM, (2012) This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of ‘open science’. BioSocieties 7(2): 140–168.
25. Leonelli S, Ankeny RA, (2012) Re-thinking organisms: The impact of databases on model organism biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43(1): 29–36.
26. Leonelli S, (2010) Packaging small facts for re-use: Databases in model organism biology. In: Howlett P, Morgan MS, (eds) How Well Do Facts Travel?: The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–348.
27. Leonelli S, (2012a) When humans are the exception: Cross-species databases at the interface of clinical and biological research. Social Studies of Science 42(2): 214–236.
28. Leonelli S, (2012b) Classificatory theory in data-intensive science: The case of open biomedical ontologies. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26(1): 47–65.
29. Leonelli S, (2013) Why the current insistence on open access to scientific data? Big Data, knowledge production and the political economy of contemporary biology. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 33(1/2): 6–11.
30. Leonelli S, Smirnoff N, Moore J, Cook C and Bastow R (2013) Making open data work in plant science. Journal for Experimental Botany 64(14): 4109–4117.
31. Levin N, Weckoswka D, Castle D, et al. (in preparation) How Do Scientists Understand Openness? Assessing the Impact of UK Open Science Policies on Biological Research.
32. Mackenzie A, McNally R, (2013) Living multiples: How large-scale scientific data-mining pursues identity and differences. Theory, Culture and Society 30: 72–91.
33. Martin P, (2001) Genetic governance: The risks, oversight and regulation of genetic databases in the UK. New Genetics and Society 20(2): 157–183.
34. Mayer-Schönberger V and Cukier K (2013) Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. London: John Murray Publisher.
35. Müller-Wille S, Charmantier I, (2012) Natural history and information overload: The case of Linnaeus. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43: 4–15.
36. O’Malley M, Soyer OS, (2012) The roles of integration in molecular systems biology. Studies in the History and the Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43(1): 58–68.
37. Porter TM, (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Raley R, (2013) Dataveillance and countervailance. In: Gitelman L, (ed.) ‘Raw Data’ is an Oxymoron, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 121–146.
39. Rheinberger H-J, (2011) Infra-experimentality: From traces to data, from data to patterning facts. History of Science 49(3): 337–348.
40. Rosenthal N, Ashburner M, (2002) Taking stock of our models: The function and future of stock centres. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 711–717.
41. Royal Society (2012) Science as an Open Enterprise. Available at: http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/science-public-enterprise/report/ (accessed 14 January 2014).
42. Stein LD, (2008) Towards a cyberinfrastructure for the biological sciences: Progress, visions and challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics 9(9): 678–688.
43. Stevens H, (2013) Life Out of Sequence: Bioinformatics and the Introduction of Computers into Biology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Strasser BJ, (2008) GenBank – Natural history in the 21st century? Science 322(5901): 537–538.
45. Traweek S, (1998) Iconic devices: Towards an ethnography of physical images. In: Downey G, Dumit J, (eds) Cyborgs and Cytadels, Santa Fe, NM: The SAR Press.
46. Wylie A, (2002) Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archeology, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.