Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories

Big Data and Society

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Gabrys, Jennifer ^a   Pritchard, Helen ^a   Barratt, Benjamin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

citizen data; Citizen sensing; data citizenships; data practices; data stories; environmental data

Indexed keywords

EID: 85074193763     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20539517     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2053951716679677     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2016) Health Consultation: Brooklyn Township PM2.5. Brooklyn Township, Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania (22 April).
2. Air Quality Egg. Available at: http://airqualityegg.com (accessed 15 August 2016).
3. Aoki PM, Honicky RJ, Mainwaring A, et al. (2009) A vehicle for research: Using street sweepers to explore the landscape of environmental community action. In: CHI ’09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp. 375–384.
4. Aradau C, Blanke T, (2015) The (Big) Data-security assemblage: Knowledge and critique. Big Data & Society 2(2): 1–12.
5. Bell G, (2015) The secret life of big data. In: Boellstorff T, Maurer B, (eds) Data, Now Bigger and Better!, Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
6. Carslaw DC, Ropkins K, (2012) Openair – an R package for air quality data analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software 27–28: 52–61.
7. Carslaw DC, (2014) The openair manual – open-source tools for analysing air pollution data. Manual for version 1.0, London: King’s College London.
8. Colaneri K (2014) Gas drilling draws citizen scientists to the field. State Impact: Pennsylvania (NPR). Available at: http://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2014/12/19/gas-drilling-draws-citizen-scientists-to-the-field (accessed 15 August 2016).
9. Corburn J, (2005) Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Elwood SA, (2008) Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal 72: 173–183.
11. Gabrys J (2016a) Citizen sensing: Recasting digital ontologies through proliferating practices. Theorizing the Contemporary. Cultural Anthropology. Available at: http://culanth.org/fieldsights/823-citizen-sensing-recasting-digital-ontologies-through-proliferating-practices (accessed 13 October 2016).
12. Gabrys J, (2016b) Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13. Gabrys J, (2016c) Re-thingifying the internet of things. In: Starosielski N, Walker J, (eds) Sustainable Media: Critical Approaches to Media and Environment, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 180–195.
14. Gabrys J and Pritchard H (2015) Next-Generation environmental sensing: Moving beyond regulatory benchmarks for citizen-gathered data. In: Proceedings of the workshop ‘Environmental Infrastructures and Platforms 2015’ (eds AJ Berre, S Schade and J Piera), co-located with the European Citizen Science Association General Assembly 2015 (ECSA GA'2015) Barcelona, Spain. pp. 57–65. Available at: http://ecsa.citizen-science.net/sites/default/files/envip-2015-draft-binder.pdf (last accessed 13 October 2016).
15. Gabrys J, Pritchard H, (forthcoming) Sensing practices. In: Braidotti R, Hlavajova M, (eds) Posthuman Glossary, London: Bloomsbury Press.
16. Garnett E, (2016) Developing a feeling for error: Practices of monitoring and modelling air pollution data. Big Data & Society 3(2): 1–12.
17. Goodchild MF, (2007) Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69: 211–221.
18. Gray J, Lämmerhirt D and Bounegru L (2016) Changing what counts: How can citizen-generated and civil society data be used as an advocacy tool to change official data collection? Open Knowledge Foundation. Available at: http://civicus.org/thedatashift/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/changing-what-counts-2.pdf (accessed 15 August 2016).
19. Haraway D, (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_Onco-Mouse™, New York, NY: Routledge.
20. Hurdle J (2016) PA expands particulate monitoring as federal study finds high level in one location. State Impact: Pennsylvania (NPR). Available at: https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2016/05/05/pa-expands-particulate-monitoring-as-federal-study-finds-high-level-in-one-location (accessed 15 August 2016).
21. Irwin A, (1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development, London: Routledge.
22. Kitchin R, McArdle G, (2016) What makes Big Data, Big Data? Exploring the ontological characteristics of 26 datasets. Big Data & Society 3(1): 1–10.
23. Lagoze C, (2014) Big Data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone. Big Data & Society 1(2): 1–11.
24. Laney D (2001) 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity and variety. In: Meta Group. Available at: https://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf (accessed 15 August 2016).
25. Mah A (2016) Environmental justice in the age of big data: challenging toxic blind spots of voice, speed, and expertise. Environmental Sociology 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2016.1220849.
26. Michael M, Lupton D, (2016) Toward a manifesto for the ‘public understanding of big data’. Public Understanding of Science 25(1): 104–116.
27. Nature Editorial (2015) Rise of the citizen scientist. Nature 524(265). Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/rise-of-the-citizen-scientist-1.18192 (accessed 15 August 2016).
28. Osborn SG, Vengosh A, Warner NR, (2011) Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 108(2): 8172–8176.
29. Ottinger G (2016) A missing link in making meaning from air monitoring? Backchannels (4S online). Available at: http://www.4sonline.org/blog/post/a_missing_link_in_making_meaning_from_air_monitoring (accessed 15 August 2016).
30. Ottinger G and Zurer R (2011) New voices, new approaches: Drowning in data. Issues in Science and Technology 27 (3). Available at: http://issues.org/27-3/ottinger (accessed 15 August 2016).
31. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) (2016) DEP expands particulate matter air monitoring network (press release). Available at: http://www.media.pa.gov/Pages/DEP_details.aspx?newsid=629 (accessed 15 August 2016).
32. Pritchard H and Gabrys J (2016) From citizen sensing to collective monitoring: Working through the perceptive and affective problematics of environmental pollution. GeoHumanities
33. Ruppert E, Harvey P, Lury C, et al. (2015) Socialising Big Data: From concept to practice. CRESC Working Paper Series 138. Available at: http://www.cresc.ac.uk/medialibrary/workingpapers/wp138.pdf (accessed 15 August 2016).
34. Safecast. Available at: http://blog.safecast.org (accessed 15 August 2016).
35. Schrock AR, (2016) Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: A history from publicity to open government data. New Media & Society 2016 18(4): 581–599.
36. Smart Citizen. Available at: https://smartcitizen.me (accessed 15 August 2016).
37. Snyder EG, Watkins TH, Solomon PA, (2013) The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring. Environmental Science and Technology 47: 11369−11377.
38. Steinzor N (2016) Community air monitoring of oil and gas pollution: A survey of issues and technologies. White paper by Earthworks. Available at: https://www.earthworksaction.org/files/publications/Air_Monitoring_White_Paper_March_2016_(1).pdf (accessed 15 August 2016).
39. Taylor AS, Lindley S, Regan T, (2014) Data and life on the street. Big Data & Society 1(2): 1–7.
40. Taylor A, (2016) Data, (bio)sensing, and (other-)worldly stories from the cycle routes of London. In: Nafus D, (ed.) Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 189–209.
41. Uprichard E (2013) Big data, little questions? Discover Society. Available at: http://www.discoversociety.org/focus-big-data-little-questions (accessed 15 August 2016).
42. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2015) Citizen science and crowdsourcing: Creative approaches to environmental protection (draft report). Available at: http://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/nacept_background_material_2.pdf (accessed 15 August 2016).
43. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2013) Draft roadmap for next generation air monitoring. Available at: http://www.eunetair.it/cost/newsroom/03-US-EPA_Roadmap_NGAM-March2013.pdf (accessed 15 August 2016).
44. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (n.d.) Criteria air pollutants. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants (accessed 15 August 2016).
45. Vis F (2013) A critical reflection on Big Data: Considering APIs, researchers and tools as data makers. First Monday 18(10). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4878/3755 (accessed 15 August 2016).
46. Wallis JC, Borgman CL, Mayernik MS, (2007) Know thy sensor: Trust, data quality, and data integrity in scientific digital libraries. In: Kovács L, Fuhr N, Meghini C, (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries 4675, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 380–391.
47. World Health Organisation (2006) (2006) WHO Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen dioxide and Sulfur dioxide: Global Update 2005, Geneva: World Health OrganisationAvailable at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69477/1/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf (accessed 15 August 2016).