Tax compliance and the psychology of justice: Mapping the field

Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 41-70

  Wenzel, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85073174508     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (126)

1. Adams, J.S. (1965), 'Inequity in Social Exchange', in L. Berkowitz (ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2), Academic Press, New York, pp. 267-99
2. Allingham, M. and Sandmo, A. (1972), 'Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis', Journal of Public Economics, vol. I, pp. 323-38
3. Aim, J. and Beck, W. (1990), 'Tax Amnesties and Tax Revenues', Public Finance Quarterly, vol. 18, pp. 433-53
4. Aim, J., Jackson, B.R., and McKee, M. (1993), 'Fiscal Exchange, Collective Decision Institutions, and Tax Compliance', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 22, pp. 285-303
5. Aim, J., McClelland, G. and Schulze, W. (1992), 'Why do People Pay Taxes?', Journal of Public Economics, vol. 48, pp. 21-38
6. Aim, J., Sanchez, I. and De Juan, A. (1995), 'Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Tax Compliance', Kyklos, vol. 48, pp. 3-18
7. Andreoni, J., Erard, B. and Feinstein, J. (1998), 'Tax Compliance', Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 36(2), pp. 818-60
8. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (2001), Four Corners: The Crackdown, Broadcast on 18 June 200 I, http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/
9. Australian Taxation Office (1997), The Taxpayers' Charter, Australian Taxation Office, Canberra
10. Barrett-Howard, E. and Tyler, T.R. (1986), ·Procedural Justice as a Criterion in Allocation Decisions', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 50, pp. 296-304
11. Blumenthal, M. (2000), 'Leaping Tall Buildings: Pursuing Greater Compliance and Less Burden in the United States', Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation, vol. 54, pp. 351-56
12. Bordignon, M. (1993), 'A Fairness Approach to Income Tax Evasion', Journal of Public Economics, vol. 52, pp. 345-62
13. Braithwaite, J. (1989), Crime, Shame, and Reintegration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
14. Braithwaite, J (chapter 12, this volume), 'Through the Eyes of the Advisers: A Fresh Look at High Wealth Individuals'
15. Braithwaite, V. (2001), 'The Community Hopes, Fears and Actions Survey: Goals and Measures', Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 2, The Australian National University, Canberra
16. Braithwaite, V. and Reinhart, M. (2000), 'The Taxpayers' Charter: Does the Australian Tax Office Comply and Who Benefits?', Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 1, The Australian National University, Canberra
17. Brewer, M.B. (1991), 'The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 17, pp. 4 75-82
18. Brewer, M.B. and Schneider, S.K. (1990), ' Social Identity and Social Dilemmas', in D. Abrams and M.A. Hogg (eds), Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances, Harvester-Wheatsheaf, London, pp. 169-84
19. Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E. and Schul, Y. (1981), 'Microjustice and Macro justice', in M.J. Lerner and S.C. Lerner (eds), The Justice Motive in Social Behaviour, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 173-202
20. Calderwood, G. and Webley, P. (1992), 'Who Responds to Changes in Taxation? The Relationship Between Taxation and Incentive to Work', Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 13(4), pp. 735-48
21. Carnes, G.A. and Cuccia, A.D. (1996), ' An analysis of the Effect of Tax Complexity and its Perceived Justification on Equity Judgments', The Journal of the American Taxation Association, vol. 18, pp. 40-56
22. Christensen, A.L., Weihrich, S.G. and Newman, M.D.G. (1994), 'The Impact of Education on Perceptions of Tax Fairness', in T.M. Porcano (ed), Advances in Taxation (Vol. 6), JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 63-94
23. Copeland, P.V. and Harmelink, P.J. (1995), 'Using Taxpayer Perception of Fairness to Redesign the Federal Income Tax Structure', in T.M. Porcano (ed), Advances in Taxation (Vol. 7), JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 43-72
24. Cowell, F.A. (I 992), 'Tax Evasion and Inequity', Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 13(4), pp. 521-43
25. Dawes, R.M. (1980), 'Social Dilemmas', Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 31, pp. 169-93
26. De Juan, A., Lasheras, M.A. and Mayo, R. (1994), 'Voluntary Tax Compliant Behavior of Spanish Income Tax Payers', Public Finance, vol. 49, pp. 90-105
27. Dean, P., Keenan, T. and Kenney, F. (1980), 'Taxpayers' Attitudes to Income Tax Evasion: An Empirical Study', British Tax Review, vol. 25, pp. 28-44
28. Dube, L. and Guimond, S. (1986), 'Relative Deprivation and Social Protest: The Personal Group Issue ', in J. Olson, C.P. Herman and M. Zanna (eds), Relative Deprivation and Social Comparison, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 201-16
29. Eckhoff, T. (1974), Justice: Its Determinants in Social Interaction, Rotterdam University Press, Rotterdam
30. Elffers, H. (2000), 'But Taxpayers do Cooperate!', in M. van Vugt, M. Snyder, T.R. Tyler and A Biel (eds), Cooperation in Modern Society, Routledge, London, pp. 184-94
31. Falkinger, J. (1995), Tax Evasion, Consumption of Public Goods and Fairness', Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 16(1), pp. 63-72
32. Feather, N.T. (1999), Values, Achievement, and Justice: Studies in the Psychology of Deservingness, Kluwer/Plenum, New York
33. Folger, R. (1986), 'Rethinking Equity Theory: A Referent Cognitions Model', in H. W. Bierhoff, R.L. Cohen and J. Greenberg (eds), Justice in Social Relations, Plenum, New York, pp. 145-62
34. Gerbing, M.D. (1988), 'An Empirical Study of Taxpayer Perceptions of Fairness', Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Accounting Association, August, Orlando
35. Gordon, J.P.F. (1989), 'Individual Morality and Reputation Costs as Deterrents to Tax Evasion', European Economic Review, vol. 33, pp. 797-805
36. Grasmick, H.G. and Bursik Jr, R.J. (1990), 'Conscience, Significant Others, and Rational Choice: Extending the Deterrence Model', Law and Society Review, vol. 24, pp. 837-61
37. Greenberg, J. (1982), 'Approaching Equity and Avoiding Inequity in Groups and Organizations', in J. Greenberg and R.L. Cohen (eds), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 389-435
38. Greenberg, J(1993), 'The Social Side of Fairness: Interpersonal and Informational Classes of Organizational Justice', in E. Cropanzano (ed), Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 79-103
39. Hafer, C. and Olson, J.M. (1993), 'Beliefs in a Just World, Discontent and Assertive Actions by Working Women', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 19, pp. 30-8
40. Haslam, S.A (2001), Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach, Sage, London
41. Hasseldine, J. (1998), 'Tax Amnesties: An International Review', Bu/letinfor International Fiscal Documentation, vol. 52, pp. 303-10
42. Heuer, L., Bumenthal, E., Douglas, A and Weinblatt, T. (1999), 'A Deservingness Approach to Respect as a Relationally Based Fairness Judgment', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 25, pp. 1279-92
43. Hite, P.A and Roberts, M.L. (1991), 'An Experimental Investigation of Taxpayer Judgments on Rate Structure in the Individual Income Tax System', Journal of the American Taxation Association, vol. 13, pp. 47-63
44. Hobson, K. (2002), 'Say No to the ATO: The Cultural Politics of Protest Against the Australian Taxation Office', Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 37, The Australian National University, Canberra
45. Hogan, R. and Emler, N.P. (1981), 'Retributive Justice', in M.J. Lerner and S.C. Lerner (eds), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 125-44
46. Homans, G.C. (1961), Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
47. Kessler, T., Mummendey, A and Leisse, U.K. (2000), 'The Personal-group Discrepancy: Is there a Common Information Basis for Personal and Group Judgment? ', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, pp. 95-109
48. Kinsey, K.A and Grasmick, H.G. (1993), ' Did the Tax Reform Act of 1986 Improve Compliance? Three studies of Pre-and Post-TRA Compliance Attitudes', Law and Policy, vol. 15, pp. 239-325
49. Kinsey, K.A., Grasmick, H.G. and Smith, K.W. (1991), 'Framing Justice: Taxpayer Evaluations of Personal Tax Burdens', Law and Society Review, vol. 25, pp. 845-73
50. Lerner, M.J. (1977), 'The Justice Motive: Some Hypotheses as to its Origins and Forms', Journal of Personality, vol. 45, pp. 1-52
51. Lerner, M.J (1991), 'Integrating Societal and Psychological Rules of Entitlement', in R. Vermunt and H. Steensma (eds), Social Justice in Human Relations (Vol. 1), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 13-32
52. Leventhal, G.S. (1976), 'Fairness in Social Relationships', in J.W. Thibaut, J.T. Spence and R.C. Carson (eds), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, General Learning Press, Morristown, pp. 211-39
53. Leventhal, G.S (1980), 'What Should be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships', in K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg and R.H. Willis (eds), Social Exchange, Plenum, New York, pp. 27-55
54. Lewis, A. (1978), 'Perceptions ofTax Rates', British Tax Review, vol. 6, pp. 358-66
55. Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R. (1988), The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York
56. Long, S.B. and Swingen, J.A. (1991), 'Taxpayer Compliance: Setting New Agendas for Research', Law and Society Review, vol. 25, pp. 637-83
57. Magner, N.R., Johnson, G.G., Sobery, J.S. and Welker, R.B. (2000), 'Enhancing Procedural Justice in Local Government Budget and Tax Decision Making', Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 30, pp. 798-815
58. Major, B. (1994), 'From Social Inequality to Personal Entitlement: The Role of Social Comparisons, Legitimacy Appraisals, and Group Membership', in M.P. Zanna (ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 26), Academic Press, New York, pp. 293-355
59. Markovsky, B. (1985), 'Multilevel Justice Theory', American Sociological Review, vol. 50, pp. 822-39
60. Mason, R. and Calvin, L.D. (1978), 'A Study of Admitted Income Tax Evasion', Law and Society Review, vol. 13, pp. 73-89
61. Mikula, G. (1993), 'On the Experience of Injustice', in W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (eds), European Review ofSocial Psychology (Vol. 4), Wiley, Chichester, pp. 223-44
62. Miller, D.T. and Vidmar, N. (1981), 'The Social Psychology of Punishment Reactions', in M.J. Lerner and S.C. Lerner (eds), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 145-72
63. Milliron, V. (1985), 'A Behavioral Study ofthe Meaning and Influence ofTax Complexity', Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 23, pp. 794-816
64. Morrison, B.E. (1997), 'Social Cooperation: Re-defining the Self in Self-interest', Unpublished PhD thesis, The Australian National University, Canberra
65. Moser, D.V., Evans III, J.H., and Kim, C.K. (1995), 'The Effects of Horizontal and Exchange Inequity on Tax Reporting Decisions', The Accounting Review, vol. 70, pp. 619-34
66. Murphy, K. (2002a), 'Procedural Justice and the Australian Taxation Office: A Study of Tax Scheme Investors', Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 35, The Australian National University, Canberra
67. Murphy, K. (2002b), 'Trust Me, I'm the Taxman: The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance', Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 43, The Australian National University, Canberra.Murphy, K. and Byng, K. (2002), 'Preliminary Findings from the Australian Tax System Survey of Tax Scheme Investors', Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 40, The Australian National University, Canberra
68. Musgrave, R.A. (1994), 'Progressive Taxation, Equity, and Tax Design', in 1. Slemrod (ed), Tax Progressivity and Income Inequality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 341-56
69. Oakes, P.J. (1996), 'The Categorisation Process: Cognition and the Group in the Social Psychology of Stereotyping', in W.P. Robinson (ed.), Social Groups and Identities: Developing the Legacy of Henri Ta;fel, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 95-119
70. Pepitone, A. (1971), 'The Role of Justice in Interdependent Decision Making', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 7, pp. 144-56
71. Platow, M., O'Connell, A, Shave, R. and Hanning, P. (1995), 'Social Evaluations of Fair and Unfair Allocators in Interpersonal and Intergroup Situations', British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 34, pp. 363-81
72. Porcano, T.M. (1984), 'Distributive Justice and Tax Policy', The Accounting Review, vol. 59, pp. 619-36
73. Porcano, T.M (1988), 'Correlates of Tax Evasion', Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 9( I), pp. 47-67
74. Reekers, P.M.J., Sanders, D.L. and Roark, S.J. (1994), 'The Influence of Ethical Attitudes on Taxpayer Compliance', National Tax Journal, vol. 47, pp. 825-36
75. Roberts, M.L. (1994), 'An Experimental Approach to Changing Taxpayers' Attitudes Towards Fairness and Compliance Via Television', The Journal of the American Taxation Association, vol. 16, pp. 67-86
76. Roberts, M.L. and Hite, P.A (1994), 'Progressive Taxation, Fairness and Compliance', Law and Policy, vol. 16, pp. 27-47
77. Roberts, M.L., Hite, P.A. and Bradley, C.F. (1994), 'Understanding Attitudes Toward Progressive Taxation', Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 58(2), pp. 165-90
78. Runciman, W.G. (1966), Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-century England, University of California Press, Berkeley
79. Sandford, C., Godwin, M. and Hardwick, P. (1989), Administrative and Compliance Costs of Taxation, Fiscal Publications, Bath
80. Schmolders, G. (1970), 'Survey Research in Public Finance-A Behavioural Approach to Fiscal Theory', Public Finance, vol. 25, pp. 300-6
81. Scholz, J.T. (1998), 'Trust, Taxes and Compliance', in V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (eds), Trust and Governance, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 135-66
82. Schopler, J. and Insko, C. A. (1992), 'The Discontinuity Effect in Interpersonal and Intergroup Relations: Generality and Mediation', in W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (eds), European Review ofSocial Psychology(Vol. 3), Wiley, Chichester, pp. 121-51
83. Senate Economics References Committee (200 I), Inquiry into Mass Marketed Tax Effective Schemes and Investor Protection: Interim Report, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra
84. Sheffrin, S.M. (1994), 'Perceptions of fairness in the Crucible ofTax Policy', in J. Slemrod (ed), Tax Progressivity and Income Inequality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 309-40
85. Sheffrin, S. and Triest, R. (1992), ·can Brute Deterrence Backfire? Perceptions and Attitudes in Taxpayer Compliance', in J. Slemrod (ed), Who Pays Taxes and Why? Tax Compliance and Enforcement, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 193-218
86. Shover, N., Job, J. and Carroll, A. (Chapter 8, this volume), 'The Compliance Model in Action: A Case Study of Building and Construction'
87. Sigala, M., Burgoyne, C. and Webley, P. (1999), 'Tax Communication and Social Influence: Evidence from a British Sample', Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, vol. 9, pp. 237-41
88. Smith, H.J., Spears, R. and Oyen, M. (1994), ''People like us': The Influence of Personal Deprivation and Group Membership Salience on Justice E·valuations', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 30, pp. 277-99
89. Smith, K.W. (1992), 'Reciprocity and Fairness: Positive Incentives for Tax Compliance', in J. Slemrod (ed), Why People Pay Taxes: Tax Compliance and Enforcement, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 223-50
90. Smith, K. W. and Stalans, L.J. (1991), 'Encouraging Tax Compliance with Positive Incentives: A Conceptual Framework and Research Directions', Law and Policy, vol. 13(1), pp. 35-53
91. Song, Y.D. and Yarbrough, T.E. (1978), 'Tax Ethics and Taxpayer Attitudes: A Survey', Public Administration Review, vol. 38, pp. 442-52
92. Spicer, M. W. and Becker, L.A. (1980), 'Fiscal Inequity and Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach', National Tax Journal, vol. 33, pp. 171-75
93. Spicer, M. W. and Lundstedt, S.B. (1976), 'Understanding Tax Evasion', Public Finance, vol. 31, pp. 295-305
94. Stalans, L. and Lind, E.A. (1997), 'The Meaning of Procedural Fairness: A Comparison of Taxpayers' and Representatives' Views of Their Tax Audits', Social Justice Research, vol. 10, pp. 311-31
95. Steil, J. (1994), 'Equality and Entitlement in Marriage: Benefits and Barriers', in M.J. Lerner and G. Mikula (eds), Entitlement and the Affectional Bond: Justice in Close Relationships, Plenum, New York, pp. 229-58
96. Stella, P. (1991), 'An Economic Analysis ofTax Amnesties', Journal of Public Economics, vol. 46, pp. 383-400
97. Strtimpel, B. (1969), 'The Contribution of Survey Research to Public Finance', in A.T. Peacock (ed), Quantitative Analysis in Public Finance, Praeger, New York, pp. 13-22
98. Taylor, N. (Chapter 4, this volume), 'Understanding Taxpayer Attitudes Through Understanding Taxpayer Identities'
99. Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1978), 'A Theory ofProcedure', California Law Review, vol. 66, pp. 541-66
100. Turner, J.C., Oakes, P.J., Haslam, S.A. and McGarty, C. (1994), 'Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 20, pp. 454-63
101. Tyler, T.R. (1989), 'The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of the Group Value Model', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 57, pp. 830-38
102. Tyler, T.R (1990), Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance, Yale University Press, New Haven
103. Tyler, T.R( 1997), 'The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities', Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. I, pp. 323-45
104. Tyler, T.R(2000), 'Why Do People Obey the Law?', Paper presented at the lst International Conference of the Centre for Tax System Integrity, December 4-5, The Australian National University, Canberra
105. Tyler, T.R. and Smith, H.J. (1998), Social Justice and Social Movements', in O.G. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology (41h ed, Vol. 2), McGraw-Hill, Boston, pp. 595-629
106. Tyler, T.R. and Smith, H.J (1999), 'Justice, Social Identity, and Group Processes', in T.R. Tyler, R.M. Kramer and O.P. John (eds), The Psychology of the Social Self, Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp. 223-64
107. Tyler, T.R., Boeckmann, R.J., Smith, H.J. and Huo, Y.J. (1997), Social Justice in a Diverse Society, Westview, Boulder
108. Tyler, T.R., Rasinski, K. and Spodick, N. (1985), 'The Influence of Voice on Satisfaction with Leaders: Exploring the Meaning of Process Control', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 48, pp. 72-81
109. van Dijk, E. and Wilke, H. A.M. (1993), 'Differential Interests, Equity, and Public Good Provision', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 1-16
110. Vogel, J. (1974), ' Taxation and Public Opinion in Sweden: An Interpretation of Recent Survey Data', National Tax Journal, vol. 27, pp. 499-513
111. Walker, I. and Mann, L. (1987), 'Unemployment, Relative Deprivation and Social Protest', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 13, pp. 275-83
112. Wallschutzky, I.G. (1984), 'Possible Causes of Tax Evasion', Journal of Economic Psychology, 5(4), pp. 371-84
113. Walster, E., Berscheid, E. and Walster, G. W. (1973), 'New Directions in Equity Research', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 151-76
114. Walster, E., Walster, G. W. and Berscheid, E. (1978), 'Equity: Theory and Research', Allyn and Bacon, Boston
115. Wartick, M. (1994), ' Legislative Justification and the Perceived Fairness of Tax Law Changes: A Reference Cognitions Theory Approach', The Journal of the American Tax Association, vol. 16, pp. 106-23
116. Webley, P., Robben, H. and Morris, I. (1988), 'Social Comparison, Attitudes and Tax Evasion in a Shop Simulation', Social Behaviour, vol. 3, pp. 219-28
117. Weigel, R.H., Hessing, D.J. and Elffers, H. (1987), 'Tax Evasion Research: A Critical Appraisal and Theoretical Model', Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 8, pp. 215-35
118. Weiner, B. (1995), Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct, Guilford, New York
119. Wenzel, M. (2000), 'Justice and Identity: The Significance of Inclusion for Perceptions of Entitlement and the Justice Motive', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 26, pp. 157-76
120. Wenzel, M (2001 a), 'A Social Categorisation Approach to Distributive Justice: Social Identity as the Link Between Relevance of Inputs and Need for Justice', British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 40, pp. 315-35
121. Wenzel, M (2001b), ' The Impact of Outcome Orientation and Justice Concerns on Tax Compliance: The Role of Taxpayers' Identity ', Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 6, The Australian National University, Canberra
122. Wenzel, M (2001c), 'Principles of Procedural Fairness in Reminder Letters and Awareness of Entitlements: A Prestudy', Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 10, The Australian National University, Canberra
123. Wenzel, M (200ld), Which Fairness Perceptions are Related to Tax Compliance.?: An Empirical Analysis, Manuscript in preparation, The Australian National University, Canberra
124. Wenzel, M. (2002), 'What is Social About Justice? Inclusive Identity and Group Values as the Basis of the Justice Motive', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 205-18
125. Wit, A., Wilke, H. A.M. and Oppewal, H. (1992), 'Fairness in Asymmetric Social Dilemmas', in W.B.G. Liebrand, D.M. Messick and H.A.M. Wilke (eds), Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, pp. 183-97
126. Zander, A. (1971), Motives and Goals in Groups, Academic Press, New York