Current status and future prospects for nonplanar rearview mirrors

SAE Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  Flannagan, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLEET OPERATIONS; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

ASPHERIC MIRRORS; CURRENT STATUS; EFFECTIVE SOLUTION; FLEET OF VEHICLES; FUTURE PROSPECTS; MOTOR VEHICLE; RADIUS OF CURVATURE; REAR-VIEW MIRRORS;

MIRRORS;

EID: 85072483990     PISSN: 01487191     EISSN: 26883627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4271/2000-01-0324     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Bowles, T. S., (1969). Motorway overtaking with four types of exterior rear view mirror. In International Symposium on Man-Machine Systems, Volume 2, Transport systems and vehicle control (IEEE Conference Record no. 69C58-MMS) Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
2. Burger, W. J., Mulholland, M. U., Smith, R. L., & Sharkey, T. J., (1980). Passenger vehicle, light truck and van convex mirror optimization and evaluation studies: Vol. 1: Convex mirror optimization (DOT HS 805 695). Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
3. Burger, W. J., Mulholland, M. U., Smith, R. L., Sharkey, T. J., & Bardales, M. C., (1980). Passenger vehicle, light truck and van convex mirror optimization and evaluation studies: Vol. 2: Evaluation of alternative mirror configurations (DOT HS 805 778). Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
4. Chovan, J. D., Tijerina, L., Alexander, G., & Hendricks, D. L., (1994). Examination of lane change crashes and potential IVHS countermeasures (Report No. DOT HS 808 071). Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
5. Connolly, P. L., (1964). Human factors in rear vision. In Design aspects for rear vision in motor vehicles, SP-253 (pp. 1-17). New York: Society of Automotive Engineers.
6. De Vos, A. P., Theeuwes, J., & Perel, M., (1999). Nonplanar rearview mirrors: A survey of mirror types and European driver experience (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 1999-01-0658). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
7. Felrice, B., (1996). Mirror safety public meeting. Federal Register, 61, 4624-4625.
8. Flannagan, C. A. C., & Flannagan, M. J., (1998). Acceptance of nonplanar rearview mirrors by U.S.drivers. In Shen W., Veldman R., Vertiz A. M., & Zobel G., (Eds.), Human factors in driving, vehicle seating, and rear vision, SP-1358 (pp. 165-170). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
9. Flannagan, M., (1988). Human performance aspects of rearview mirrors: An applied-literature review (Report No. UMTRI 88-20). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
10. Flannagan, M. J., & Sivak, M., (1996). Workshop on rearview mirror human factors research needs: Summary of recommendations (Report No. UMTRI-96-27). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
11. Flannagan, M. J., Sivak, M., & Traube, E. C., (1996). Driver perceptual adaptation to nonplanar rearview mirrors. In Serafin C., & Zobel G., (Eds.), Automotive design advancements in human factors: Improving drivers' comfort and performance, SP-1155 (pp. 213-220). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
12. Flannagan, M. J., Sivak, M., & Traube, E. C., (1997). Effects of large-radius convex rearview mirrors on driver perception. In New concepts in international automotive lighting technology, SP-1249 (pp. 175-181). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
13. Flannagan, M. J., Sivak, M., & Traube, E. C., (1999). Quantifying the direct field of view when using driver-side rearview mirrors (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 1999-01-0656). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
14. Flannagan, M. J., Sivak, M., Kojima, S., & Traube, E.C., (1998). A field study of distance perception with large-radius convex rearview mirrors. In Human factors in driving, vehicle seating, and rear vision, SP-1358 (pp. 139-146). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
15. Flannagan, M. J., Sivak, M., Schumann, J., Kojima, S., & Traube, E. C., (1997). Distance perception in driver-side and passenger-side convex rearview mirrors: Objects in mirror are more complicated than they appear (Report No. UMTRI-97-32). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
16. Helmers, G., Flannagan, M. J., Sivak, M., Owens, D. A., Battle, D. A., & Sato, T., (1992). Response times using flat, convex, and multiradius rearview mirrors (Report No. UMTRI-92-20). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
17. Kelley, C., R., & Prosin, D. J., (1969). Motor vehicle rear vision. Santa Monica, California: Dunlap and Associates. (NTIS No. PB 186228).
18. Luoma, J., Sivak, M., & Flannagan, M. J., (1994). Effects of driver-side mirror type on lane-change accidents (Report No. UMTRI-94-34). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
19. Marcus, K. H., (1964). In the vehicle and on the road. In Design aspects for rear vision in motor vehicles, SP-253 (pp. 18-26). New York: Society of Automotive Engineers.
20. Mortimer, R. G., (1971). The effects of convex exterior mirrors on lane-changing and passing performance of drivers (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 710543). New York: Society of Automotive Engineers.
21. Mourant, R. R., & Donohue, R. J., (1974). Mirror sampling characteristics of drivers (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 740964). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
22. Olson, P. L., & Winkler, C. B., (1985). Measurement of crash avoidance characteristics of vehicles in use (Report No. UMTRI-85,20). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
23. Pilhall, S., (1981). Improved rearward view (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 810759). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
24. Platzer, G. E., (1995). The geometry of automotive rearview mirrors: Why blind zones exist and strategies to overcome them (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 950601). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
25. Preamble to an amendment to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 111, 47 Fed. Reg. 38698 (1982) (codified at 49 C.F.R. § 571.111).
26. Schumann, J., Sivak, M., & Flannagan, M. J., (1996). Are driver-side convex mirrors helpful or harmful? (Report No. UMTRI-96-7). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
27. Seeser, J., (1974). Automotive convex mirrors: Optical properties (Technical Report 201). Holland, Michigan: Donnelly Mirrors.
28. Society of Automotive Engineers. (1995). Information report SAE J985: Vision factors considerations in rearview mirror design (rev. June 1995). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
29. Staplin, L., Lococo, K., Sim, J. J., & Gish, K., (1998). Simulator-based assessment of driver-side mirrors for passenger cars (Report No. DOT HS 808 807). Washington, D.C.: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
30. Sugiura, S., & Kimura, K., (1978). Outside rearview mirror requirements for passenger cars: Curvature, size, and location (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 780339). Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers.
31. Walraven, P. L., & Michon, J. A., (1969). The influence of some side mirror parameters on the decisions of drivers (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 690270). New York: Society of Automotive Engineers.
32. Wang, J.-S., & Knipling, R. R., (1994). Lane change/merge crashes: Problem size assessment and statistical description (DOT HS 808 075). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
33. Weintraub, D. J., Haines, R. F., & Randle, R. J., (1984). The utility of head-up displays: Eye-focus vs. decision times. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 28th Annual Meeting, 529-533.