Meaningful tradeoffs in product family design considering monetary and technical aspects of commonality

SAE Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Dai, Zhihuang ^a   Scott, Michael J ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE BUMPERS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING;

COMPUTATION TIME; COST SAVING; OPTIMAL DESIGN; PRODUCT FAMILIES; PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN; PRODUCT PERFORMANCE; PROVIDE GUIDANCES; TECHNICAL ASPECTS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 85072460874     PISSN: 01487191     EISSN: 26883627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-0351     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Anderson, D. M., [ 1998 ], Agile Product Development for Mass Customization, Chicago Irwin, Chicago.
2. Chen, W., Rosen, D., Allen, J. K., & Mistree, F., [ 1994 ], Modulatrity and the Independence of Functional Requirements in Designing Complex Systems., in 'Concurrent Product Design' Vol. 74, ASME-DE, pp. 31-38.
3. Collier, D. A., [ 1981 ], 'The Measurement and Operating Benefits of Component Part Commonality' Decision Sciences 12 (1), 85-96.
4. Conner, C. G., Kroon, J. P. D., & Mistree, F., [ 1999 ], A Product Variety Tradeoff evaluation method for a family of cordless drill transmissions, in 'Proceedings of the ASME 1999 Design Engineering Technical Conferences'; ASME. paper no. DETC99/DAC-8625.
5. Dahmus, J., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J., & Otto, K., [ 2000 ], Modular Product Architecture, in 'Proceedings of the 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference' ASME. Paper No. DETC00/DTM-14565.
6. Dai, Z., & Scott, M. J., [ 2004 a ], Effective product family design using preference aggregation, in 'Proceedings of the 2004 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference' ASME. paper no. DETC2004- 57419.
7. Dai, Z., & Scott, M. J., [ 2004 b ], Product platform design through sensitivity analysis and cluster analysis, in 'Proceedings of the 2004 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference' ASME. paper no. 44ETC2004-57464.
8. Dogramaci, A., [ 1979 ], 'Design of common components considering implications of inventory costs and forecasting' AIIE Transactions 11 (2), 129-135. (Pubitemid 9470790)
9. Eynan, A., & Rosenblatt, M. J., [ 1996 ], 'Commponent Commonality effects on inventory costs' IIE Transactions 28, 93-104. (Pubitemid 126759970)
10. Fellini, R., Kokkolaras, M., Papalambros, P., & Perez-Duarte, A., [ 2005 ], 'Platform selection under performance bounds in optimal design of product families' ASME Journal of Mechanical Design. To appear.
11. Fujimoto, H., & Iida, Y., [ 2003 ], 'Assembly Process Design for Managing Manufacturing Complexities Because of Product Varieties' Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 15, 283-307.
12. Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P., & Otto, K. N., [ 2000 ], Modular Platform-based Product Family Design, in 'Proceedings of the 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference' ASME. paper no. DETC00/DAC-14238.
13. Gupta, S., & Krishnan, V., [ 1998 ], 'Product family-based assembly sequence design methodology' IIE Transactions 30, 933-945. (Pubitemid 128728654)
14. Hernandez, G., Simpson, T. W., Allen, J. K., Bascaran, E., Avila, L. F., & Salinas, F., [ 2001 ], 'Robust Design of Families of Products with Production Modeling and Evaluation' ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 123 (2), 183-190. (Pubitemid 33716197)
15. Jiao, J., & Tseng, M. M., [ 2000 ], 'Understanding product family of mass customization by developing commonality indices' Journal of Engineering Design 11 (3), 225-243.
16. Kota, S., & Sethuraman, K., [ 2000 ], 'a Metric for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families' ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 122, 403-410.
17. Martin, M. V., & Ishii, K., [ 1997 ], Design For Variety: Development of Complexity Indices and Design Charts, in 'Proceedings of the 1997 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences' ASME. paper no. DETC97/DFM-4359.
18. Martin, M. V., & Ishii, K., [ 2000 ], Design for Variety: A Methodology for Developing Product Platform Architectures, in 'Proceedings of the 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference' ASME. paper no. DETC00/DFM-14021.
19. Messac, A., Martinez, M. P., & Simpson, T. W., [ 2000 ], Effective Product Family Design Using Physical Programming and the Product Platform Concept Exploration Method, in 'Proceedings of the 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference' ASME. paper no. DETC00/DAC-14252.
20. Messac, A., Martinez, M. P., & Simpson, T. W., [ 2002 a ], 'Effective Product Family Design Using Physical Programming and the Product Platform Concept Exploration Method' Engineering Optimization 3 (3), 245-261. (Pubitemid 35263140)
21. Messac, A., Martinez, M., & Simpson, T. W., [ 2002 b ], 'Introduction of a product family penalty function using physical programming' Transactions of ASME 124 (2), 164-172. (Pubitemid 35202465)
22. Nayak, R. U., Chen, W., & Simpson, T. W., [ 2000 ], A Variation-Based Method for Product Family Design, in 'Proceedings of the ASME 1999 Design Engineering Technical Conferences' ASME. paper no. DETC00/DAC-14264.
23. Nelson, S., Parkinson, M., & Papalambros, P., [ 2001 ], 'Multicriteria optimization in product platform design' ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 123, 199-204. (Pubitemid 33716199)
24. Park, J., & Simpson, T. W., [ 2003 ], Production Cost Modeling to Support Product Family Design Optimization, in 'Proceedings of the 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference' ASME. paper no. DETC03/DAC-48720.
25. Scott, M. J., & Antonsson, E. K., [ 2000 ], Using Indifference Points in Engineering Decisions, in 'Proceedings of the 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference' ASME. paper no. DETC2000/DTM- 14559.
26. Siddique, Z., & Repphum, B., [ 2001 ], 'Estimating Cost Savings when Implementing a Product Platform Approach' Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 9 (4), 285-294.
27. Simpson, T. W., [ 2003 ], Product Platform Design and Optimization: Status and Promise, in 'Proceedings of the 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference' ASME. paper no. DETC03/DTM-48717.
28. Simpson, T. W., & Maier, J. R. A., [ 1999 ], A Product Plat-from Concept Exploration Method for Product Family Design, in 'Proceedings of the ASME 1999 Design Engineering Technical Conferences' ASME. paper no. DETC99/DTM-8761.
29. Ulrich, K., [ 1995 ], 'The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm' Research Policy 24 (3), 419-440.
30. Wacker, J. G., & Treleven, M., [ 1986 ], 'Component Part Standardization: An Analysis of Commonality Sources and Indices' Journal of Operations Management 6 (2), 219-244.
31. Wassenaar, H. J., Chen, W., Cheng, J., & Sudjianto, A., [ 2003 ], Enhancing discrete choice demand modeling for decision-based design, in 'Proceedings of the 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference' ASME. paper no. DETC/DAC-48683.
32. Zamirowksi, E. J., & Otto, K. N., [ 1999 ], Identifying Product Portfolio Architecture Modularity Using Function and Variety Heuristics, in 'Proceedings of the ASME 1999 Design Engineering Technical Conferences' ASME. paper no. DETC99/DTM-8760.