Design space reduction for multi-objective optimization and robust design optimization problems

SAE Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages

  Wang, G Gary ^a   Shan, Songqing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

engineering design; multi objective optimization; robust design optimization; Rough Set; space reduction

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; PARETO PRINCIPLE; PRODUCT DESIGN; ROUGH SET THEORY;

BI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; COMPUTATION INTENSIVES; ENGINEERING DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; PARETO-OPTIMAL FRONTIERS; ROBUST DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; ROUGH-SET-BASED METHODS; SPACE REDUCTIONS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 85072435070     PISSN: 01487191     EISSN: 26883627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-0240     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Eschenauer H., Koski J., and Osyczka A., (1990). Multicriteria Design Optimization. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg.
2. Chen W., Wiecek M.M., and Zhang J., (1999). Quality Utility - A Compromise Programming Approach to Robust Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME, 121: pp. 179-187.
3. Haftka R.T., Scott E.P., and Cruz J.R., (1998). Optimization and Experiments: A Survey. Applied Mechanics Review, 51 (7): pp. 435-448. (Pubitemid 128436152)
4. Arora J.S., (1989). Introduction to Optimum Design. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York.
5. Koch P.N., Simpson T.W., Allen J.K., and Mistree F., (1999). Statistical Approximations for Multidisciplinary Desgin Optimization: The Problem of Size. Journal of Aircraft, 36 (1): pp. 275-286.
6. Montgomery D., (1991). Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
7. Hacker K., Eddy J., and Lewis K., (2001). Tuning a Hybrid Optimization Algorithm by Determining the Modality of the Design Space. ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
8. Gelsey A., Schwabacher M., and Smith D., (1998). Using Modeling Knowledge to Guide Design Space Search. Artificial Intelligence, 100 (1-0): pp. 1-27.
9. Sasena M., Papalambros P., and Goovaerts P., (2002). Global Optimization of Problems with Disconnected Feasible Regions Via Surrogate Modeling. 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, Georgia.
10. Zhu L., and Kazmer D., (2003). An Extensive Simplex Method for Mapping Global Feasibility. Journal of Engineering Optimization, 35 (2): pp. 165-176.
11. Frits A.P., and Mavris D.N., (2002). A Screening Method For Customizating Designs Around Non-Convergent Region of Design Spaces. 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, Georgia.
12. Shan S., and Wang G.G., (2003). Introducing rough set for design space exploration and optimization. ASME 2003 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
13. Branin F.H., and Hoo S.K., (1972). A method for finding multiple extrema of a function of n variables. In: Lootsma F., (Editor), Numerical methods for nonlinear optimization. Academic Press, New York, pp. 231-237.
14. Chen W., Fu W., Biggers S.B., and Latour R.A., (2000). An Affordable Approach for Robust Design of Thick Laminated Composite Structure. Journal of Optimization and Engineering, 1 (3): pp. 305-322.
15. Gold S., and Krishnamurty S., (1997). Trade-offs in Robust Engineering Design. The 1997 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Saramento, California, USA.
16. Wang G.G., (2003). Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Inherited Latin Hypercube Design Points. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design, 125: pp 210-220.