Application of damage models in bending and hydroforming of aluminum alloy tube

SAE Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages

  Gholipour, J ^a   Worswick, M J ^a   Oliveira, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENDING (FORMING); DUCTILITY; MAGNESIUM ALLOYS; MANGANESE ALLOYS; METAL FORMING; TERNARY ALLOYS; TUBES (COMPONENTS);

ALUMINUM ALLOY TUBES; DAMAGE PARAMETER; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FORMING PARAMETERS; NUMERICAL RESULTS; STRAIGHT TUBES; TUBE BENDING; VOID NUCLEATION;

ALUMINUM ALLOYS;

EID: 85072427433     PISSN: 01487191     EISSN: 26883627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-0835     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Morphy G., Tube Hydroforming Analysis- A discussion of automotive structural parts provides guide to tubular hydroforming technology, Automotive Engineering International, July 1998, 91-94.
2. Constantine B., Roth R., and Clark JP., Substituting Tube-Hydroformed Parts for Automotive Stampings: An Economical Model, Journal of the Minerals Metals & Materials Society, Vol. 53 (8), Aug. 2001, 33-38. (Pubitemid 33007111)
3. Dohmann F., Hartl Ch., Tube hydroforming-Research and Practical Application, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 71, 1997, 174-186.
4. Ni C. M., Stamping and Hydroforming Process Simulations with a 3D Finite Element Code, SAE Technical Paper 940753, 1994.
5. Mason M., Hydroform Tubes for Automotive Body Structure Applications, SAE Technical Paper 930575, 1993.
6. Yang Jae-Bong, Jeon Byung-Hee, Oh Soo-Ik, The Tube Bending Technology of a Hydroforming Process for an Automotive Part, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 111, pp. 175-81, 2001. (Pubitemid 32335435)
7. Ahmetoglu M., Altan T., Tube Hydroforming: State-of-The Art and Future Trends, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 98, pp. 25-33, 2000. (Pubitemid 30530239)
8. Lucke H.U., Hartl Ch., and Abbey T., Hydroforming, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 115, pp. 87-91, 2001.
9. Nakamura S., Sigiura H., Onoe H., Ikemoto K., Hydromechanical Drawing of Automotive Parts, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 46, pp. 491-503, 1994.
10. Asnafi N., Analytical Modelling of Tube Hydroforming, Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 34, pp. 295-330, 1999. (Pubitemid 30499345)
11. th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Forming Processes- Verification of Simulation with Experiment, Numisheet2002, October 21-25, Jeju Island, Korea, Vol. 1, pp. 447-452, 2002.
12. Stoughton Thomas B., Stress-Based Forming Limits in Sheet-Metal Forming, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol. 123, pp. 417-422, October 2001. (Pubitemid 33715759)
13. Stoughton Thomas B., Stress-Based Forming Limits in Sheet-Metal Forming, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol. 123, pp. 417-422, October 2001. (Pubitemid 33715759)
14. Graf A., and Hosford W., Effect of Changing Strain Paths on Forming Limit Diagrams of AL 2008- T4, Metallurgical transactions, Vol. 24A, pp 2503-2512, November 1993.
15. Kohara S., Influence of Strain Path on Forming Limit Strains in Aluminum, Materials Science Forum, Vol. 331-337, pp. 431-436, 2000.
16. Reid J.V., and Khodayari G., report on Correlation between Twist Compression Test (TCT) and Aluminum Straight Tube Corner Fill Tests, Industrial Research & Development Institute (IRDI), Project# 234235, Midland, Ontario, Canada, 2002.
17. Worswick M. J., and Pelletier P., Numerical Simulation of Ductile Fracture During High Strain Rate, The European Physical Journal Applied Physics, Vol. 4, pp. 257-267, 1998. (Pubitemid 128603634)