Quantifying the consequences of the eyes-on-road benefit attributed to head-up displays

SAE Technical Papers

Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages

  Kiefer, Raymond J ^a   Gellatly, Andrew W ^b  

^a GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION   (United States)

^b DELPHI CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING;

HEAD UP DISPLAYS; TIME-PERIODS; TRAFFIC SAFETY;

ROADS AND STREETS;

EID: 85072417491     PISSN: 01487191     EISSN: 26883627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4271/960946     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Assman, E., (1988). Die Bremsweganzeige im Head-Up Display: Ein Beitrag zur Erhorung der Fahrsicherheit (The indication of braking distance on a head-up display: A contribution to enhance driving safety.). Zeitschrift fur Verkehrssicherheit, 34, 55-59.
2. Beyerlein, D.G., (1995). New uses and image sources for head-up displays of the future (SAE Paper # 950960). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
3. Briziarelli, G., and Allan, R.W., (1989). The effect of a head-up speedometer on speeding behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 1171-1176.
4. Cornsweet, T. N., (1962). The staircase method in psychophysics. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 485-491.
5. Forbes. L., (1973). Overview of driver field of view research (SAE Paper # 730606). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
6. Grant, B.S., Kiefer, R.J., and Wierwille, W.W., (1995). Drivers' detection and identification of head-up versus head-down telltale warnings in automobiles. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 39th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
7. Grant, B.S., Kiefer, R.J., Wierwille, W.W., and Beyerlein, D.G., (1995). Exploring applications for automotive HUDs through ergonomic research: Telltale warnings and beyond. Proceedings of Associazione Tecnica Dell' Automobile 3rd International Conference on Vehicle Comfort & Ergonomics. Bologna, Italy.
8. Haslegrave, C.M., (1979). Measurement of eye-heights of British car drivers above the road surface (TRRL Supplementary Report 464). Crowthorne, UK: Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
9. Haslegrave, C.M., (1993). Visual aspects in vehicle design. In Peacock B., and Karwowski W., (Eds.), Automotive ergonomics (pp. 79-98). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis, Inc.
10. Hays, W.L., (1981). Statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
11. Inuzuka, Y., Osumi, Y., and Shinkai, H., (1991). Visibility of head up display (HUD) for automobiles. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 1574-1578). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
12. Ishii, I., (1980). Comparison of visual recognition time of analogue and digital displays in automobiles (SAE Paper # 800354). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
13. Kaptein, N.A., (1994). Benefits of in-car head-up displays (Report TNO-TM 1994 B-20). Soesterberg, Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Research Institute.
14. Kato, H., Ito, H., Shima, J., Imaizumi, M., and Shibata, H., (1992). Development of hologram head-up display (SAE Paper #92060). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
15. Kiefer, R.J., (1991). Effect of a head-up versus head-down digital speedometer on visual sampling behavior and speed control performance during daytime automobile driving. SAE 1991 Transactions, 100, Section 6 (Journal of Passenger Cars), pp. 82-93, SAE Paper # 910111, Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
16. Kiefer, R. J., (in press-a). Defining the HUD benefit time window. In Gale A.G., (Ed.), Vision in vehicles-VI. Amsterdam: North-Holland-Elsevier.
17. Kiefer, R.J., (1995). Human factors issues surrounding an automotive vision enhancement system. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 39th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
18. Kiefer, R.J., and Angell, L.S., (1993). A comparison of the effects of an analog versus digital speedometer format on driver performance in a task environment similar to driving. In Gale A.G., (Ed.), Vision in vehicles-IV (pp. 283-290). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
19. Milgram. P., (1987). A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 449-456.
20. Mourant, R.R., and Rockwell, T.H., (1970). Mapping eye-movement patterns to the visual scene in driving: An exploratory study. Human Factors, 12, 81-87.
21. Mourant, R.R., and Rockwell, T.H., (1972). Strategies of visual search by novice and experienced drivers. Human Factors, 14, 325-335.
22. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1986). Fatal Accident Reporting System data. Washington, DC.
23. Neuman, T.R., (1989). New approach to design for stopping sight distance. Transportation Research Record 1208, 14-22.
24. Okabayashi, S., Sakata, M., Furukawa, M., Fukano, J., Daidoji, S., Hashimoto, C., Ishikawa, T., (1989). Development of practical heads-up display for production vehicle application (SAE paper # 890559). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
25. Okabayashi, S., Sakata, M., Furukawa, M., and Hatada, T., (1990). A heads-up display performance in automotive use. Society for Information Display, 31, 255-261.
26. Okabayashi, S., Sakata, M., and Hatada, T., (1991). Driver's ability to recognize objects in the forward view with superimposition of head-up display images. Society for Information Display International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, Volume XXII, 465-468. Playa del Ray, CA: Society for Information Display.
27. Olson, P.L., (1989). Driver Perception Response Time (SAE Paper # 890731). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
28. Olson, P.L., and Sivak, M., (1986). Perception-Response Time to Unexpected Roadway Hazards. Human Factors, 28, 91-96.
29. Owens, D.A., (1979). The Mandelbaum effect: Evidence for an accommodative bias toward intermediate viewing distances. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 646-652.
30. Robbins, C.K., (1969). Head-up display (HUD) aiding in car following. Unpublished masters thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
31. Rockwell, T.H., (1971). Eye movement analysis of visual information acquisition in driving: An overview. Paper presented at North Carolina State University.
32. Rutley, K.S., (1975). Control of drivers' speed by means other than enforcement. Ergonomics, 18, 89-100.
33. Sakata, M., Okabayashi, S., Fukano, J., Hirose, S., and Ozone, N., (1987). Contributions of head-up displays (HUDs) to safe driving. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles, Washington, DC.
34. Siegel. S., (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behaviorial sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Simonelli. N.M., (1983). The dark focus of the human eye and its relationship to age and visual defect. Human Factors, 25, 85-92.
36. Sojourner, R.J., and Antin, J.F., (1990). The effects of a simulated head-up display speedometer on perceptual task performance. Human Factors, 32, 329-340.
37. Sprenger, A., (1993). In-vehicle displays: Head-up display field tests. In Gale A.G., (Ed.), Vision in vehicles-IV (pp. 283-290). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
38. The Michigan Department of State Highways. (1973). Michigan Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
39. Walter, W., (1991). Ergonomic information evaluation of analogue and digital coding of instruments in vehicles. In Gale A.G., (Ed.), Vision in vehicles-III (pp. 205-211). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
40. Ward, N.J., Stapleton, L., and Parkes, A.M., (1994). Behavioral and cognitive impact of night-time driving with HUD contact analogue infra-red imaging. Paper presented at the XIVth International Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (Paper No. 94-S2-O-04). Munich, Germany.
41. Weihrauch, M., Meloeny, G.G., and Goesch, T.C., (1989). The first head-up display introduced by General Motors (SAE Paper # 890288). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
42. Weintraub, D.J., Haines, R.F., and Randle, R.J., (1984). The utility of head-up displays: Eye-focus vs. decision times (1991). Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 28th Annual Meeting (pp. 529-533). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
43. Weintraub, D.J., Haines, R.F., and Randle, R.J., (1985). Head-up display (HUD) utility, II: Runway to HUD transitions monitoring eye focus and decision times. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting (pp. 615-619). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
44. Wierwille, W.W., and Tijerina, L., (1993). An analysis of driving accidents narratives as a means of determining problems caused by in-vehicle visual allocation and visual workload. In Gale A.G., (Ed.), Vision in vehicles-V (pp. 283-290). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.