메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance triazoxide
[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

fungicide; peer review; pesticide; risk assessment; Triazoxide

Indexed keywords


EID: 85072382896     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2018     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (58)

References (30)
  • 1
    • 85078370963 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • (Build 29305, 25 Nov
    • ACD/ChemSketch, Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., ACD/Labs Release: 12.00 Product version: 12.00 (Build 29305, 25 Nov 2008).
    • (2008) 12.00 Product version: 12.00
  • 2
    • 84882502938 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA on the appropriateness of using the current FOCUS surface water scenarios for estimating exposure for risk assessments in aquatic ecotoxicology in the context of Council Directive 91/414/EEC
    • 2004a
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2004a. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA on the appropriateness of using the current FOCUS surface water scenarios for estimating exposure for risk assessments in aquatic ecotoxicology in the context of Council Directive 91/414/EEC. The EFSA Journal (2004) 145, 1–31.
    • (2004) The EFSA Journal , vol.145 , pp. 1-31
  • 3
    • 84882502938 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request of EFSA related to FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of groundwater contamination
    • 2004b
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2004b. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request of EFSA related to FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of groundwater contamination. The EFSA Journal (2004) 93, 1–20.
    • (2004) The EFSA Journal , vol.93 , pp. 1-20
  • 4
    • 79953755669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil
    • 2007
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA related to the default Q10 value used to describe the temperature effect on transformation rates of pesticides in soil. The EFSA Journal (2007) 622, 1–32.
    • (2007) The EFSA Journal , vol.622 , pp. 1-32
  • 15
    • 75649134689 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • SANCO/22/200 rev. 7, 19 March 2004
    • European Commission, 2004b. Guidance document on Dermal Absorption. SANCO/22/200 rev. 7, 19 March 2004.
    • (2004) Guidance document on Dermal Absorption
  • 18
    • 0003612765 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2., pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002
    • FOCUS (2000). “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances”. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002.
    • (2000) “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances” , pp. 202
  • 19
    • 3042767718 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2
    • FOCUS (2001). “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp.
    • (2001) “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC” , pp. 245
  • 25
    • 77954669300 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Final milestone report (revised March 2001)., CSL, Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York UK
    • Prosser P (1999): Project PN0907: Potential Exposure Of Birds To Treated Seeds. Final milestone report (revised March 2001). CSL, Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York UK.
    • (1999) Project PN0907: Potential Exposure Of Birds To Treated Seeds
    • Prosser, P.1
  • 30
    • 14644434061 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • WHO reference number WHO/HSE/WSH/09.05
    • WHO, 2009. WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality, WHO reference number: WHO/HSE/WSH/09.05, 39 pp.
    • (2009) WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality , pp. 39


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.