Supporting inferences in semantic space: Representing words as regions

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Semantics, IWCS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 104-115

  Erk, Katrin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VECTOR SPACES;

CLOSEST DISTANCE; CONCEPTUAL SPACES; HIGH DIMENSIONAL SPACES; HIGH-PRECISION; HYPONYMY; INFERENCE RULES; SEMANTIC SPACE; SPACE MODELS; SPACE-BASED; WORD MEANING;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 85072275457     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. P. Cimiano, A. Hotho, and S. Staab. Learning concept hierarchies from text corpora using formal concept anaylsis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 24:305-339, 2005.
2. K. Erk and S. Padó. Towards a computational model of gradience in word sense. In Proceedings of IWCS-7, Tilburg, The Netherlands, 2007.
3. K. Erk and S. Pado. A structured vector space model for word meaning in context. In Proceedings of EMNLP-08, Hawaii, 2008.
4. C. Fellbaum, editor. WordNet: An electronic lexical database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
5. P. Gärdenfors. Conceptual spaces. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, 2004.
6. N. Goodman. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Harvard University Press, Cambdridge, MA, 1955.
7. P. Hanks. Do word meanings exist Computers and the Humanities, 34(1-2):205-215(11), 2000.
8. M. Hearst. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of COLING 1992, Nantes, France, 1992.
9. A. Kilgarriff. I don't believe in word senses. Computers and the Humanities, 31(2):91-113, 1997.
10. T. Landauer and S. Dumais. A solution to Platos problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2):211-240, 1997.
11. D. Lin. Principle-based parsing without overgeneration. In Proceedings of ACL'93, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 1993.
12. D. Lin. Automatic retrieval and clustering of similar words. In COLINGACL98, Montreal, Canada, 1998.
13. W. Lowe and S. McDonald. The direct route: Mediated priming in semantic space. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 2000.
14. K. Lund and C. Burgess. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28:203-208, 1996.
15. C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
16. S. McDonald and M. Ramscar. Testing the distributional hypothesis: The influence of context on judgements of semantic similarity. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 2001.
17. J. Mitchell and M. Lapata. Vector-based models of semantic composition. In Proceedings of ACL-08, Columbus, OH, 2008.
18. G. L. Murphy. The Big Book of Concepts. MIT Press, 2002.
19. R. M. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115:39-57, 1986.
20. S. Padó and M. Lapata. Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2):161-199, 2007.
21. M. Sahlgren and J. Karlgren. Automatic bilingual lexicon acquisition using random indexing of parallel corpora. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, Special Issue on Parallel Texts, 11(3), 2005.
22. H. Schütze. Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(1), 1998.
23. R. Shepard. Towards a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237(4820):1317-1323, 1987.
24. E. E. Smith, D. Osherson, L. J. Rips, and M. Keane. Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. Cognitive Science, 12(4):485-527, 1988.
25. R. Snow, D. Jurafsky, and A. Y. Ng. Semantic taxonomy induction from heterogenous evidence. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL'06, 2006.