Scientific communities and spatial concentration in economic science

Voprosy Ekonomiki

Volumn 2009, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 105-118

  Libman, A ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Economic methodology; Economics of science; Institutional competition; Labor market

Indexed keywords

EID: 85072045783     PISSN: 00428736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2009-2-105-118     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Albert M. Ökonomie der Methodologie: Eine institutionalistische Analyse, Universitätsreden der Universität des Saarlandes. 2007. Bd. 70.
2. David P. A. The Historical Origins of Open Science: An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution. Mimeo, 2007.
3. Caplan B. What If the Median Voter Were a Failing Student?, Economists’ Voice. 2008. Sept.
4. Hesse J.-O. Why Did German Economics Turn to a Mathematical Approach So Late? On the Relationship of Social Change and Scientific Progress. Mimeo, 2005.
5. Frey B. S., Humbert S., Schneider F. Was denken deutsche ökonomen? Eine empirische Auswertung einer Internetbefragung unter den Mitgliedern des Vereins für Sozialpolitik im Sommer 2006, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik. 2007. Bd. 8, No 4.
6. German Economic Review. 2008. Vol. 9, No 4.
7. Albert M. Product Quality in a Simple OLG Model of Scientific Competition, MAGKS Working Paper No. 4. 2008.
8. Butos W. N., Boettke P. J. Kirznerian Entrepreneurship and the Economics of Science, Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines. 2002. Vol. 12, No 1.
9. Dalen H. P. van, Klamer A. Is Science a Case of Wasteful Competition?, Kyklos. 2005. Vol. 58, No 3.
10. Vanberg V. J. The ‘Science-as-Market’ Analogy: A Constitutional Economics Perspective, Constitutional Political Economy. 2009 [forthcoming].
11. Mäki U. Science as a Free Market: A Reflexivity Test in Economics of Economics, Perspectives on Science. 1999. Vol. 7, No 4.
12. Rocco L. Externalities in the Economics of Science. CEPET Discussion Paper. 2003. No 3
13. Carillo M. R., Papagni E., Capitanio F. Effects of Social Interaction on Scientists’ Productivity, MPRA Paper No 7880. November 2007.
14. Eells W.C., Cleveland A.C. Faculty Inbreeding, Journal of Higher Education. 1935. Vol. 6, No 5.
15. Bronfenbrenner M. The State of Japanese Economics, American Economic Review. 1956. Vol. 46, No 2.
16. Frey B. S., Eichenberger R. American and European Economics and Economists, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1993. Vol. 7, No 3.
17. Mahoney J. Nominal, Ordinal and Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis, American Journal of Sociology. 1999. Vol. 104, No 4
18. Brady H. E., Collier D., Seawright J. Towards a Pluralistic Vision of Methodology, Political Analysis. 2006. Vol. 14, No 3
19. Adcock R., Collier D. Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research, American Political Science Review. 2001. Vol. 95, No 3.
20. Dalen H. P. van. Pluralism in Economics: A Public Good or a Public Bad?, Teaching Pluralism in Economics / J. Groenewegen (ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007.
21. Heckman J. Schools, Skills and Synapses, IZA Discussion Paper No 3515. 2008.
22. Colander D. The Ageing of an Economist, Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2003. Vol. 25, No 2.
23. Seawright J. Qualitative Comparative Analysis vis-à-vis Regression. Mimeo, 2004.
24. Luetge C. Economics in Philosophy of Science: A Dismal Contribution?, Synthese. 2004. Vol. 140, No. 3
25. Gazal-Ayal O. Economic Analysis of Law and Economics, Capital University Law Review. 2007. Vol. 35, No. 3