Perceived risk, trust, and democracy

Social Trust and the Management of Risk

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 42-52

  Slovic, Paul ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071893411     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Batt, T (1992) Nevada claims victory in Yucca deal, Las Vegas Review-Journal, July 23, pp lA, 3A
2. Bella, D A (1987) Engineering and erosion of trust, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 113, pp 117-129
3. Bella, D A, Mosher, G D and Galvo, S N (1988a) Establishing trust: Nuclear waste disposal, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 114, pp 40-50
4. Bella, D A, Mosher, G D and Galvo, S N (1988b) Technocracy and trust: Nuclear waste controversy, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 114, l,pp 27-39
5. Bord, R J (1988) The low-level radioactive waste crisis: Is more citizen participation the answer? In M A Burns (Ed), Low-level Radioactive Waste Regulation: Science, Politics, and Fear, Chelsea, MI: Lewis, pp 193-213
6. Bord, R J and O'Connor, R E (1990) Risk communication, knowledge, and attitudes: Explaining reactions to a technology perceived as risky, Risk Analysis, 10, pp 499-506
7. Campbell, J L (1988) Collapse of an Industry: Nuclear Power and the Contradictions of US policy, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press
8. Covello, V T, Sandman, P M and Slovic, P (1988) Risk Communication, Risk Statistics, and Risk Comparisons: A Manual for Plant Managers, Washington, DC: Chemical Manufacturers' Association
9. Cvetkovich, G, and Earle, T C (1992) Social Trust and Value Similarity: New Interpretations of Risk Communication in Hazard Management. Paper presented at the 1992 annual meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis, San Diego, CA
10. Efron, E (1984) The Apocalyptics, New York: Simon and Schuster
11. English, M R (1992) Siting Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities: The Public Policy Dilemma, New York: Quorum
12. Fessendon-Raden, J, Fitchen, J M and Heath, J S (1987) Providing risk information in communities: Factors influencing what is heard and accepted. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 12, pp 94-101
13. Fiorino, D (1989) Technical and democratic values in risk analysis, Risk Analysis, 9, pp 293-299
14. Flynn, J, Burns, W, Mertz, C K and Slovic, P (1992) Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: Analysis of a structural model, Risk Analysis, 12, 3, pp 417-429
15. Flynn, J, Kasperson, R, Kunreuther, H and Slovic, P (1992) Time to rethink nuclear waste storage, Issues in Science and Technology, 8, 4, pp 42-48
16. Flynn, J and Slovic, P (1993) Nuclear wastes and public trust, Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 8, pp 92-100
17. Freudenburg, W (1991) Risk and Recreancy: Weber, The Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk Perceptions (Unpublished manuscript, Department of Rural Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison)
18. Graham, J D, Green, L C and Roberts, M J (1988) In Search of Safety: Chemicals and Cancer Risk, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
19. Jacob, G (1990) Site Unseen: The Politics of Siting a Nuclear Waste Repository, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh
20. Jasanoff, S (1986) Risk Management and Political Culture, New York: Russell Sage Foundation
21. Jasper, J M (1990) Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden, and France, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
22. Jenkins-Smith, H C (1992) Culture, Trust, Ideology and Perceptions of the Risks of Nuclear Wastes: A Causal Analysis. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis, December 6-9, San Diego, CA
23. Johnson, B B (1992) Trust in Theory: Many Questions, Few Answers. Paper presented at the 1992 annual meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis, San Diego, G A
24. Kasperson, R, Golding, D and Tuler, S (1992) Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks, Journal of Social Issues, 48, 4, pp 161-187
25. Koren, G and Klein, N (1991) Bias against negative studies in newspaper reports of medical research, Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, pp 1824-1826
26. Kraus, N, Malmfors, T and Slovic, P (1992) Intuitive toxicology: Expert and lay judgments of chemical risks, Risk Analysis, 12, pp 215-232
27. Kunreuther, H, Fitzgerald, K and Aarts, T D (1993) Siting noxious facilities: A test of the facility siting credo, Risk Analysis, 13, 3, pp 301-318
28. Laird, F N (1989) The decline of deference: The political context of risk communication, Risk Analysis, 9, pp 543-550
29. Leroy, D H and Nadler, T S (1993) Negotiate way out of siting dilemmas, Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 8, 1, Spring, pp 102-107
30. Levine, S (1984) Probabilistic risk assessment: Identifying the real risks of nuclear power, Technology Review, 87, 2, pp 40-44
31. Lichtenberg, J, and MacLean, D (1992). Is good news no news? The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 17, pp 362-365
32. MacGregor, D, Slovic, P and Morgan, M G (1992) Perception of Risks from Electromagnetic Fields: A Psychometric Evaluation of a Risk-Communication Approach (Report No. 926). Eugene, OR: Decision Research
33. McCallum, D B, Hammond, S L, Morris, L A and Covello, V T (1990). Public Knowledge and Perceptions of Chemical Risks in Six Communities (Report No. 230-01-90-074). Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency
34. Mitchell, J V (1992) Perception of risk and credibility at toxic sites, Risk Analysis, 12, pp 19-26
35. Morgan, M G, Slovic, P, Nair, I, Geisler, D, MacGregor, D, Fischhoff, B, Lincoln, D and Florig, K (1985) Powerline frequency electric and magnetic fields: A pilot study of risk perception, Risk Analysis, 5, pp 139-149
36. Morone, J F and Woodhouse, E J (1989) The Demise of Nuclear Energy? Lessons for a Democratic Control of Technology, New Haven: Yale University
37. Mushkatel, A H and Pijawka, K D (1992) Institutional Trust, Information, and Risk Perceptions: Report of Findings of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Area Survey, June 29-July 1, 1992 (NWPO-SE-055-92). Carson City, NV: Nevada Nuclear Waste Project Office
38. National Research Council (NRC) (1989) Improving Risk Communication, Washington, DC: National Academy Press
39. Nelkin, D and Poliak, M (1979) Public participation in technological decisions: Reality or grand illusion? Technology Review, August/September, pp 55-64
40. Pijawka, K D and Mushkatel, A H (1991/92) Public opposition to the siting of the high-level nuclear waste repository: The importance of trust, Policy Studies Review, 10, 4, pp 180-194
41. Rayner, S and Cantor, R (1987) How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal technology choice, Risk Analysis, 1, pp 3-9
42. Renn, O and Levine, D (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In RE Kasperson and P J M Stallen (Eds), Communicating Risks to the Public. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp 175-218
43. Rothbart, J and Park, B (1986) On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, pp 131-142
44. Ruckelshaus, W D (1983) Science, risk, and public policy, Science, 221, pp 1026-1028
45. Ruckelshaus, W D (1984) Risk in a free society, Risk Analysis, 4, pp 157-162
46. Slovic, P (1987) Perception of risk, Science, 236, pp 280-285
47. Slovic, P (1990) Perception of risk from radiation. In WK Sinclair (Ed), Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Meeting of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Vol 11: Radiation Protection Today: The NCRP at Sixty Years (Vol. 11, pp. 73-97) Bethesda, MD: NCRP
48. Slovic, P, Flynn, J and Layman, M (1991) Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste, Science, 254, pp 1603-1607
49. Slovic, P, Flynn, J, Johnson, S and Mertz, C K (1993) The Dynamics of Trust in Situations of Risk (Report No. 93-2). Eugene, OR: Decision Research
50. Starr, C (1985) Risk management, assessment, and acceptability, Risk Analysis, 5, pp 97-102
51. US Department of Energy (1992) Draft Final Report of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force on Radioactive Waste Management. Washington, DC
52. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) (1983) Safety Goals for Nuclear Power Plant Operation (USNRC Report NUREG-0880). Washington, DC
53. Wall Street Journal (1989) How a PR firm executed the Alar scare, October 3, pp Al, A3