Introduction

Beyond Classical Pedagogy: Teaching Elementary School Mathematics

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 5-10

  Nelson, Barbara Scott ^a   Warfield, Janet ^b   Wood, Terry ^b  

^a Educational Development Center   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071827248     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612335-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Ball, D. L. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
2. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P., & Carey, D. (1988). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of students' problem-solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 385-401.
3. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P., Chiang, D., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children's mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499-531.
4. Chi, M. T., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence pp. 7-75. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. In R. Davis, C. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematicspp. 125-146. (Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph No. 4). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
6. Fennema, E. & Nelson, B. S. (1997). Mathematics teachers in transition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Harre, R. & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.
8. Hersch, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
11. McDiarmid, G. W., & Wilson, S. (1991). An exploration of the subject matter knowledge of alternate route teachers: Can we assume they know their subject? Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 93-103.
12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
13. Nelson, B. S. (1997). Learning about teacher change in the context of mathematics education reform: Where have we come from? In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 3-18). Mahwan, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Peterson, P., Carpenter, T., & Fennema, E. (1989). Teachers' knowledge of students' knowledge in mathematics problem solving: Correlational and case analyses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 558-569.
15. Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24, 257-262.
16. Prawat, R. S., & Peterson, P. L. (1999). Social constructivist views of learning. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 203-226). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17. Romberg, T. A., & Carpenter, T. P. (1986). Research on teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 850-873). New York: Macmillan.
18. Schifter, D. (Ed.). (1996a). What's happening in math class: Envisioning new practices through teacher narratives. (Vol. 1). New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Schifter, D. (Ed.). (1996b). What's happening in math class: Reconstructing professional identities. (Vol. 2). New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Schifter, D., & Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Reinventing mathematics education: Stories of teachers meeting the challenge of reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Schifter, D., & Simon, M. (1992). Assessing teachers' development of a constructivist view of mathematics learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 187-97.
22. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 57, 4-14.
23. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
24. Thompson, C. L. & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Wood, T., Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1991). Change in teaching mathematics: A case study. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 587-616.