Realizations of cscl conversations: Technology transfer and the csile project

Cscl 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 3-10

  Miyake, Naomi ^a   Koschmann, Timothy ^b  

^a CHUKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071816173     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410601544-9     Document Type: Editorial

References (23)

1. Bell, P., & Davis, E. (2000). Designing Midfred: Scaffolding students’ reflection and argumentation using a cognitive software guide. In B.Fishman & S.O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 142-149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L B.Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K.McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bruce, B., & Peyton, J.K. (1990). A new writing environment and an old culture: A situated evaluation of computer networking to teach writing. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 171-191.
5. Bruce, B., & Peyton, J.K. (1993). A situated evaluation of ENFI. In B.Bruce, J.Peyton, & T.Batson (Eds.), Networked-based classrooms: Promises and realities (pp. 33-49). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Case, R. (1996). Changing views of knowledge and their impact on education research and practice. In D.Olson & N.Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. XXX-XXX). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Greeno, J.G., & Goldman, S.V. (Eds.). (1998). Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Holbrook, J., & Kolodner, J.L. (2000). Scaffolding the development of an inquire-based (science) classroom. In B.Fishman & S.O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 221-227). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513-549.
12. Linn, M.C., & Hsi, S. (1999). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Miyake, N. (1997, December). Contribution to closing panel [digital video]. Presented in E. Woodruff (Chair), Where do we go from here? Second International Meeting on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL '97), University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. (Available on T.Koschmann, L.Sadler, M.Lamon, & B.Fishman (Eds.) (2000). CSCL '97 CD-ROM. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.)
14. Miyake, N., & Masukawa, H. (2000). Relation-making to sense-making: Supporting college students’ constructive understanding with an enriched collaborative notesharing system. In B. Fishman & S.O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 41-47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Miyake, N., Masukawa, H., Nakayama, T., Shirouzu, H., & Yuasa, K. (2000, November). Construction of collaborative learning culture in college-level cognitive science classrooms. Paper presented at the International Workshop on New Technologies for Collaborative Learning, Awajishima, Japan.
16. Miyake, N., Masukawa, H., & Shirouzu, H. (2001). The complex jigsaw as an enhancer of collaborative knowledge building in undergraduate introductory cognitive science courses, Proceedings of Euro-CSCL (pp. 454-461).
17. Oshima, J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Collaborative learning processes associated with high and low conceptual progress. Instructional Science, 24, 125-155.
18. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I.Harel & S.Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
19. Rubin, A., & Bruce, B. (1990). Alternate realizations of purpose in computer-supported writing. Theory into Practice, 29, 256-263.
20. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T.Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R.S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computersupported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 51-68.
22. Shirouzu, H., Miyake, N., & Masukawa, H. (in preparation for Cognitive Science). “Cognitively active externalization for situated reflection in collaboration�?.
23. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering towards Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.