“Ways of seeing” women in antiquity: An introduction to feminism in classical archaeology and ancient art history

Naked Truths: Women, Sexuality and Gender in Classical Art and Archaeology

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 12-42

  Brown, Shelby ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071805173     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203037713-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (230)

1. S. Brown, “Feminist Research in Archaeology: What Does It Mean? Why Is It Taking So Long?�?, in N. S. Rabinowitz and A. Richlin (eds), Feminist Theory and the Classics, New York, Routledge, 1993, p. 240
2. R. H. McGuire and R. Paynter (eds), The Archaeology of Inequality, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1991.
3. D. Miller, M. Rowlands, and C. Tilley (eds), Domination and Resistance, London, Unwin Hyman, 1989.
4. P. Stone and R. MacKenzie, The Excluded Past: Archaeology in Education, Boston, Unwin Hyman, 1990.
5. J. P. Hallett, “Feminist Theory, Historical Periods, Literary Canons, and the Study of Graeco-Roman Antiquity,�? in Rabinowitz and Richlin, Feminist Theory, pp. 44-72
6. C. Owens, “The Discourse of Others: Feminists and Postmodernism,�? in N. Broude and M. D. Garrard (eds), The Expanding Discourse: Feminism and Art History, New York, IconEditions, 1992, pp. 490-1.
7. C. L. Langer, “Against the Grain: A Working Gynergenic Art Criticism,�? in A. Raven, C. L. Langer, and J. Frueh (eds), Feminist Art Criticism: An Anthology, Ann Arbor, UMI Research Press, 1988, p. 117.
8. N. S. Rabinowitz, “Introduction,�? in Rabinowitz and Richlin, Feminist Theory, p. 11
9. I. Hodder, Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. xiv, 168-72.
10. M. di Leonardo, “Introduction: Gender, Culture, and Political Economy,�? in M. di Leonardo (ed.), Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1991, p. 18, and also see pp. 140-3
11. M. W. Conkey and J. M. Gero (eds), “Tensions, Plurality, and Engendering Archaeology: An Introduction to Women and Prehistory,�? in J. Gero and M. Conkey (eds), Engendering Archaeology: Women in Prehistory, Cambridge, Mass., Basil Blackwell, 1991, p. 9.
12. J. C. Berlo, R. B. Phillips, et al., “A Range of Critical Perspectives: The Problematics of Collecting and Display, Part 1,�? The Art Bulletin, 1995, vol. 77, pp. 6-24.
13. R. R. Bretell, V. N. Desai, et al., “The Problematics of Collecting and Display, Part 2,�? The Art Bulletin, 1995, vol. 77, pp. 166-79.
14. E. Hooper-Greenhill, Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge, New York, Routledge, 1992.
15. I. Karp and S. D. Lavine (eds), Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display, Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991.
16. S. Pearce, Archaeological Curatorship, Leicester, Leicester University Press, 1990
17. S. Pearce, Museums, Objects and Collections: A Cultural Study, Washington, DC, Smithsonian Institution Press, 1992
18. G. W Stocking, Objects and Others: Essays on Museums and Material Culture, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.
19. L. Nochlin, “Introduction,�? in L. Nochlin (ed.), Women, Art, and Power and Other Essays, New York, Harper and Row, 1988, p. xiii.
20. S. L. Dyson, “Two Paths to the Past: A Comparative Study of the Last Fifty Years of American Antiquity and American Journal of Archaeology, American Antiquity, 1985, vol. 50, pp. 452-63.
21. S. L. Dyson, “The Role of Ideology and Institutions in Shaping Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,�? in A. L. Christenson (ed.), Tracing Archaeology’s Past. The Historiography of Archaeology, Carbondale and Edwardsville, Southern Illinois University Press, 1989, p. 133.
22. L. Vogel, “Fine Arts and Feminism: The Awakening Consciousness,�? in Raven, Langer, and Frueh, Feminist Art Criticism, p. 21.
23. N. Broude and M. D. Garrard, “Preface,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Expanding Discourse, p. x.
24. C. Langer, “Turning Points and Sticking Places in Feminist Art Criticism,�? College Art Journal, 1991, vol. 50 (2), p. 28.
25. J. W. Scott, Gender and the Politics of History, New York, Columbia University Press, 1988, p. 31.
26. C. Claassen, “Questioning Gender: An Introduction,�? in C. Claassen (ed.), Exploring Gender Through Archaeology: Selected Papers from the 1991 Boone Conference, Madison, Prehistory Press, 1992, pp. 4-6.
27. A. Cornwall and N. Lindisfarne, “Introduction,�? in A. Cornwall and N. Lindisfarne (eds), Dislocating Masculinity: Comparative Ethnographies, New York, Routledge, 1994, pp. 1-10.
28. N. K. Denzin, “Sexuality and Gender: An Interactionist/Poststructural Reading,�? in P. England (ed.), Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory, New York, Aldine de Gruyter, 1993, pp. 199-206
29. B. D. Miller, “Preface,�? in B. D. Miller (ed.), Sex and Gender Hierarchies, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 4-7.
30. J. Nordbladh and T. Yates, “This Perfect Body, This Virgin Text: Between Sex and Gender in Archaeology,�? in I. Bapty and T. Yates (eds), Archaeology After Structuralism: Post-Structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology, New York, Routledge, 1990, pp. 222-37.
31. I. Bapty and T. Yates, “Introduction: Archaeology and Post-Structuralism,�? in Bapty and Yates, Archaeology After Structuralism, p. 1
32. Hodder, Reading the Past, pp. xiv- 168
33. I. Morris, “Introduction,�? in I. Morris (ed.), Classical Greece: Ancient Histories and Modern Archaeologies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 44.
34. L. R. Binford, Debating Archaeology, London, Academic Press, 1989, p. 4.
35. N. Broude and M. D. Garrard, “Introduction,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Expanding Discourse, p. 22, n. 5
36. M. Bal and N. Bryson, “Semiotics and Art History,�? The Art Bulletin, 1991, vol. 73, pp. 174-208.
37. J. W Scott, “Deconstructing Equality-versus-Difference: Or, The Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism,�? in M. Hirsch and E. F. Keller (eds), Conflicts in Feminism, New York, Routledge, 1990, pp. 134-48.
38. T. Moi, French Feminist Thought: A Reader, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1987
39. J. Duran, Toward a Feminist Epistemology, Savage, Rowman and Littlefield, 1991, pp. 161-81.
40. K. Adler and M. Pointon, The Body Imaged: The Human Form and Visual Culture Since the Renaissance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
41. R. Betterton, “Introduction: Feminism, Femininity and Representation,�? in R. Betterton (ed.), Looking On: Images of Femininity in the Visual Arts and Media, New York, Pandora Press, 1987, pp. 1-17.
42. N. Broude and M. D. Garrard, “Preface and Acknowledgments,�? in N. Broude and M. D. Garrard (eds), Feminism and Art History: Questioning the Litany, New York, Harper and Row, 1982, pp. vii-ix.
43. N. Broude and M. D. Garrard, “Introduction: Feminism and Art History,�? in Broude and Garrard, Feminism and Art History: Questioning the Litany, pp. 1-17
44. N. Broude and M. D. Garrard, “Introduction: Feminism and Art in the Twentieth Century,�? in N. Broude and M. D. Garrard (eds), The Power of Feminist Art: The American Movement of the 1970s, History and Impact, New York, Harry Abrams, 1994, pp. 10-29.
45. W. Chadwick, Women, Art, and Society, London, Thames and Hudson, 1990.
46. J. Frueh, “Towards a Feminist Theory of Art Criticism,�? in Raven, Langer, and Frueh, Feminist Art Criticism, pp. 153-65
47. J. Frueh, “The Body Through Women’s Eyes,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Power of Feminist Art, pp. 190-207
48. T. Gouma-Peterson and P. Matthews, “The Feminist Critique of Art History,�? The Art Bulletin, 1987, vol. 69 (3), pp. 326-57
49. S. Langer, “Emerging Feminism and Art History,�? Art Criticism, 1979, vol. 1 (2), pp. 66-83
50. L. Nochlin, “Women, Art, and Power,�? in Nochlin, Women, Art, and Fower, pp. xi-xvi.
51. L. Nochlin, “Starting From Scratch: The Beginnings of Feminist Art History,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Fower of Feminist Art, pp. 130-7.
52. G. Pollock, “The Politics of Theory: Generations and Geographies. Feminist Theory and the Histories of Art Histories,�? Genders, 1993, vol. 17, pp. 97-120.
53. Raven, Langer, and. Frueh, Feminist Art Criticism
54. L. Tickner, “Feminism, Art History, and Sexual Difference,�? Genders, 1988, vol. 3, pp. 92-128
55. C. Langer, Feminist Art Criticism: An Annotated Bibliography, New York, Macmillan, 1993.
56. L. Nead, “Seductive Canvases: Visual Mythologies of the Artist and Artistic Creativity,�? Oxford Art Journal, 1995, vol. 18 (2), pp. 59-69
57. N. Bryson, Vision and Fainting: The Logic of the Gaze, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1983
58. Broude and Garrard, “Introduction: The Expanding Discourse,�? p. 24, n. 29
59. P. Simons, “Women in Frames: The Gaze, the Eye, the Profile in Renaissance Portraiture,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Expanding Discourse, p. 39
60. D. Preziosi, Rethinking Art History: Meditations on a Coy Science, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1989, pp. 31-6, 54-79
61. K. Clark, The Nude: A Study in Ideal Form, New York, Pantheon Books, 1956, p. 1.
62. K. Clark, The Nude, pp. 5-6.
63. P. Fuller, Seeing Berger: A Reevaluation of Ways of Seeing, London, Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative, 1981 pp. 3-4
64. M. Pointon, Naked Authority: The Body in Western Fainting, 1830-1908, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 4, 11-17.
65. Broude and Garrard, “Introduction: The Expanding Discourse,�? p. 24, n. 29
66. Pointon, Naked Authority, p. 16.
67. S. L. Bartky, “Foucault, Femininity, and the Modernization of Patriarchal Power,�? in S. L. Bartky, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression, New York, Routledge, 1990, pp. 63-82.
68. J. Berger, Ways of Seeing, Harmondsworth and London, British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin, 1972, p. 51.
69. L. Mulvey, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,�? in L. Mulvey (ed.), Visual and Other Pleasures, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1989, pp. 14-38.
70. L. Mulvey, “Introduction,�? in Mulvey, Visual and Other Pleasures, p. vii.
71. D. Robin, “Film Theory and the Gendered Voice in Seneca,�? in Rabinowitz and Richlin, Feminist Theory, pp. 102-7
72. S. Brown, “Death as Decoration: Scenes from the Arena in Roman Domestic Mosaics,�? in A. Richlin (ed.), Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome, New York, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 182-3.
73. D. Fredrick, “Beyond the Atrium to Ariadne: Erotic Painting and Visual Pleasure in the Roman House,�? Classical Antiquity, 1995, vol. 14 (2), pp. 266-89
74. L. Nochlin, “Eroticism and Female Imagery in Nineteenth-Century Art,�? in Nochlin, Women, Art, and Power, pp. 136-44
75. S. Alpers, “Art History and its Exclusions,�? in Broude and Garrard, Feminism and Art History: Questioning the Litany, pp. 183-200
76. D. Bauer, “Alice Neel’s Female Nudes,�? Woman’s Art Journal, 1994/5, vol. 15 (2), pp. 21-6
77. R. Betterton, “How Do Women Look? The Female Nude in the Work of Suzanne Veladon,�? in H. Robinson (ed.), Visibly Female, Feminism and Art An Anthology, New York, Universe Books, 1988, pp. 250-71
78. M. L. Board, “Constructing Myths and Ideologies in Matisse’s Odalisques,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Expanding Discourse, pp. 359-79
79. M. D. Carrol, “The Erotics of Absolutism: Rubens and the Mystification of Sexual Violence,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Expanding Discourse, pp. 139-59.
80. M. A. Caws, “Ladies Shot and Painted: Female Embodiment in Surrealist Art,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Expanding Discourse, pp. 381-95.
81. C. Duncan, “The Aesthetics of Power in Modern Erotic Art,�? in Raven, Langer, and Frueh, Feminist Art Criticism, pp. 59-69.
82. C. Duncan, “The MoMA’s Hot Mamas,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Expanding Discourse, pp. 347-57
83. T. Garb, “Renoir and the Natural Woman,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Expanding Discourse, pp. 295-311.
84. T. Garb, “The Forbidden Gaze: Women Artists and the Male Nude in Late Nineteenth-Century France,�? in Adler and Pointon, The Body Imaged, pp. 33-42
85. M. D. Garrard, “Artemisia and Susanna,�? in Broude and Garrard, Feminism and Art History, pp. 147-71
86. J. S. Kasson, Marble Queens and Captives: Women in Nineteenth-Century American Sculpture, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1990.
87. R. Kendall and G. Pollock (eds), Dealing with Degas: Representations of Women and the Politics of Vision, London, Pandora Press, 1992.
88. S. Kent, “Looking Back,�? in S. Kent and J. Morreau (eds), Women’s Images of Men, London, Writers and Readers Publishing, 1985, pp. 55-74.
89. J. Marter, “Joan Semmel’s Nudes: The Erotic Self and the Masquerade,�? Women’s Art Journal, 1996, vol. 16 (2), pp. 24-8
90. L. Nead, The Female Nude: Art, Obscenity, and Sexuality, New York, Routledge, 1992
91. G. Pollock, “What’s Wrong with Images of Women?�?, in Betterton, Looking On, pp. 40-8
92. L. Tickner, “The Body Politic: Female Sexuality and Women Artists Since 1970,�? in Betterton, Looking On, pp. 235-53.
93. P. Holland, “The Page Three Girl Speaks to Women, Too,�? in Betterton, Looking On, pp. 105-19
94. K. Myers, “Fashion’ Passion,�? in Betterton, Looking On, pp. 58-65
95. J. Williamson, “Decoding Advertisements,�? in Betterton, Looking On, pp. 49-52
96. B. S. Ridgway, “The Study of Classical Sculpture at the End of the 20th Century,�? American Journal of Archaeology, 1994, vol. 98, p. 769.
97. B. S. Ridgway, “The State of Research on Ancient Art,�? Art Bulletin, 1986, vol. 68 (1), p. 21
98. L. Embree, “The Structure of American Theoretical Archaeology: A Preliminary Report,�? in V. Pinsky and A. Wylie (eds), Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology: Essays in the Philosophy, History, and Socio-politics of Archaeology, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1989
99. S. L. Dyson, “The Role of Ideology and Institutions in Shaping Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,�? in A. L. Christensen (ed.), Tracing Archaeology’s Past: The Historiography of Archaeology, Carbondale and Edwardsville, Southern Illinois University Press, 1989
100. S. L. Dyson, “From New to New Age Archaeology: Archaeological Theory and Classical Archaeology - A 1990s Perspective,�? American Journal of Archaeology, 1993, vol. 97 (2), pp. 195-206
101. S. L. Dyson, “A Classical Archaeologist’s Response to the ‘New Archaeology’,�? Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 1981, vol. 242, pp. 7-13
102. A. Snodgrass, “Structural History and Classical Archaeology,�? in J. Bintliff (ed.), The Annales School and Archaeology, Leicester, Leicester University Press, 1991, pp. 57-72.
103. K. A. Hays, “When Is a Symbol Archaeologically Meaningful? Meaning, Function, and Prehistoric Visual Arts,�? in N. Yoffee and A. Sherratt (eds), Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 81-92.
104. Ridgway, “The State of Research on Ancient Art,�? p. 7, n. 1.
105. A. Snodgrass, “Response: The Archaeological Aspect,�? in Morris, Classical Greece, p. 198.
106. J. Boardman, “Classical Archaeology: Whence and Whither?,�? Antiquity, 1988, vol. 62, pp. 795-7
107. V. Scully, “The Great Goddess and the Palace Architecture of Crete,�? in Broude and Garrard, Feminism and Art History: Questioning the Litany, pp. 33-43.
108. M. W Conkey and R. E. Tringham, “Archaeology and the Goddess: Exploring the Contours of Feminist Archaeology,�? in D. C. Stanton and A. J. Stewart (eds), Feminisms in the Academy, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1995, pp. 199-247
109. M.-A. Dobres, “Re-considering Venus Figurines: A Feminist Inspired Re-analysis,�? in A. S. Goldsmith et al. (eds), Ancient Images, Ancient Thought: The Archaeology of Ideology. Proceedings of the 1990 Chacmool Conference, Alberta, Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, 1992, pp. 245-62
110. L. Meskell, “Goddesses, Gimbutas, and ‘New Age’ Archaeology,�? Antiquity, 1995, vol. 69, pp. 74-86
111. L. Talalay, “Body Imagery of the Ancient Aegean,�? Archaeology, 1991, vol. 44 (4), pp. 46-9
112. L. Talalay, “A Feminist Boomerang: The Great Goddess of Greek Prehistory,�? Gender and History, 1994, vol. 6 (2), pp. 165-83
113. S. R. Binford, “Are Goddesses and Matriarchies Merely Figments of Feminist Imagination?,�? in C. Spretnak (ed.), The Politics of Women’s Spirituality: Essays on the Rise of Spiritual Power Within the Feminist Movement, New York, Anchor Books, 1982, pp. 541-9.
114. G. F. Orenstein, The Reflowering of the Goddess, Elmsford, NY, Pergamon Press, 1990.
115. G. F. Orenstein, “Recovering Her Story: Feminist Artists Reclaim the Great Goddess,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Power of Feminist Art, pp. 174-89.
116. H. Foley, “Interpretive Essay on the Homeric Hymn to Demeter,�? in H. P. Foley (ed.), The Homeric Hymn to Demeter: Translation, Commentary, and Interpretive Essays, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994, p. 168
117. N. Kampen, “Social Status and Gender in Roman Art: The Case of the Saleswoman,�? in Broude and Garrard, Feminism and Art History: Questioning the Litany, pp. 63-77.
118. N. Kampen, Image and Status: Roman Working Women in Ostia, Berlin, Gebr. Mann Verlag, 1981
119. N. Kampen, “The Muted Other: Gender and Morality in Augustan Rome and Eighteenth-Century Europe,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Expanding Discourse, pp. 161-9.
120. M. D. Garrard, “Leonardo da Vinci: Female Portraits, Female Nature,�? in Broude and Garrard, The Expanding Discourse, p. 77.
121. Marija Gimbutas Goddesses and Gods of Old Europe: Myths and Cult Images, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1982.
122. B. Hayden, “Observing Prehistoric Women,�? in Claassen, Exploring Gender Through Archaeology, p. 42, n. 1
123. S. B. Pomeroy, “Selected Bibliography on Women in Classical Antiquity,�? in J. Peradotto and J. P. Sullivan (eds), Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1984, pp. 320-5, 347-54.
124. M. W. Conkey, “Making the Connection: Feminist Theory and the Archaeologies of Gender,�? in H. du Cros and L. Smith (eds), Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, Canberra, Australian National University, 1993, pp. 11-12.
125. E. W. Said, Orientalism, New York, Pantheon, 1978; for a brief feminist commentary see Tickner, “Feminism, Art History, and Sexual Difference,�? p. 105
126. K. D. Kriz, “Dido versus the Pirates: Turner’s Carthaginian Paintings and the Sublimation of Colonial Desire,�? Oxford Art Journal, 1995, vol. 18, pp. 116-32.
127. T. W Herbert, “The Erotics of Purity: The Marble Faun and the Victorian Construction of Sexuality,�? Representations, 1991, vol. 36, pp. 123-5
128. G. M. Ackerman, The Life and Work of Jean-Léon Gérôme, New York, Harper and Row, 1986, p. 88.
129. C. Chard, “Nakedness and Tourism: Classical Sculpture and the Imaginative Geography of the Grand Tour,�? Oxford Art Journal, 1995, vol. 18, pp. 18-28.
130. “The Art Historical Canon: Sins of Omission,�? in J. E. Hartman and E. Messer-Davidow (eds), (En)gendering Knowledge: Feminists in Academe, Knoxville, University of Tennessee Press, 1991, pp. 222-36.
131. “The Venus Pudica: Uncovering Art History’s ‘Hidden Agendas’ and Pernicious Pedigrees,�? in a collection focusing primarily on later art history, Griselda Pollock (ed.), Generations and Geographics, London, Routledge, 1996, pp. 69-87.
132. R. Osborne, “Looking On - Greek Style. Does the Sculpted Girl Speak to Women, Too?,�? in Morris, Classical Greece, pp. 81-96.
133. N. Kampen (ed.), Sexuality in Ancient Art Near East, Egypt, Greece, and Italy, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
134. C. M. Havelock, The Aphrodite of Knidos and Her Successors, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1995
135. E. Reeder (ed.), Pandora: Women in Classical Greece, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1995.
136. J. Boswell, “Revolutions, Universals, and Sexual Categories,�? in M. Duberman, M. Vicinus, and G. Chauncey, Jr (eds), Hidden From History: Reclaiming the Gay and Lesbian Past, New York, Penguin Group, 1990, pp. 17-36.
137. E. Cantarella, Bisexuality in the Ancient World, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1992
138. J. R. Clarke, “The Decor of the House of Jupiter and Ganymede at Ostia Antica: Private Residence Turned Gay Hotel?�?, in E. K. Gazda and A. E. Haeckl (eds), Roman Art in the Private Sphere: New Perspectives on the Architecture and Decor of the Domus, Villa, and Insula, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1991, pp. 89-104
139. J. R. Clarke, “The Warren Cup and the Contexts for Representations of Male-to-Male Lovemaking in Augustan and Early Julio-Claudian Art,�? The Art Bulletin, 1993, vol. 75 (2), pp. 275-94.
140. L. Foxhall, “Pandora Unbound: A Feminist Critique of Foucault’s History of Sexuality�? in Cornwall and Lindisfarne, Dislocating Masculinity, pp. 133-46
141. D. M. Halperin, One Hundred Years of Homosexuality, New York, Routledge, 1990.
142. D. M. Halperin, “Sex Before Sexuality: Pederasty, Politics, and Power in Classical Athens,�? in Duberman, Vicinus, and Chauncey, Hidden From History, pp. 37-53
143. D. M. Halperin, J. J. Winkler, and F. I. Zeitlin (eds), Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1990
144. M. A. Katz, “Sexuality and the Body in Ancient Greece,�? Métis, Revue d’anthropologie du monde grec ancien, 1989, vol. 4, pp. 155-79.
145. M. Myerowitz, “The Domestication of Desire: Ovid’s Parva Tabella and the Theater of Love,�? in Richlin, Pornography and Representation, pp. 131-57
146. A. Richlin, “Introduction,�? in Richlin, Pornography and Representation, pp. xi-xxiii
147. A. Richlin, The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1992
148. A. Richlin, “Not Before Homosexuality: The Materiality of the Cinaedus and the Roman Law Against Love Between Men,�? Journal of the History of Sexuality, 1993, vol. 3 (4), pp. 523-73
149. H. A. Shapiro, “Eros in Love: Pederasty and Pornography in Greece,�? in Richlin, Pornography and Representation, pp. 53-72.
150. G. Sissa, Greek Virginity, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1991.
151. R. F. Sutton, Jr, “Pornography and Persuasion on Attic Pottery,�? in Richlin, Pornography and Representation, pp. 3-52
152. J. Winkler, The Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece, New York, Routledge, 1990.
153. L. A. Dean-Jones, Women’s Bodies in Classical Greek Science, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994.
154. Barbara Kellum and Thomas Habinek in Thomas Habinek (ed.), The Roman Cultural Revolution, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
155. A. Richlin, “Zeus and Metis: Foucault, Feminism, Classics,�? Helios, 1991, vol. 18 (2), pp. 160-80
156. G. Ferrari, “Figures of Speech: The Picture of Aidos,�? Métis, Revue d’anthropologie du monde grec ancien, 1990, vol. 5, pp. 185-200.
157. E. D’Ambra, Private Lives, Imperial Virtues: The Frieze of the Forum Transitorium in Rome, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1993
158. A. P. Gregory, “‘Powerful Images’: Responses to Portraits and the Political Uses of Images at Rome,�? Journal of Roman Archaeology, 1994, vol. 7, p. 80, n. 1.
159. K. King, “Producing Sex, Theory, and Culture: Gay/Straight Remappings in Contemporary Feminism,�? in Hirsch and Keller, Conflicts in Feminism, pp. 82-101.
160. B. G. Trigger, “History and Contemporary American Archaeology: A Critical Analysis,�? in C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (ed.), Archaeological Thought in America, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 23.
161. L. R. Binford and S. R. Binford (eds), New Perspectives in Archaeology, Chicago, Aldine Press, 1968.
162. L. R. Binford, An Archaeological Perspective, New York, Seminar Press, 1972
163. C. Renfrew (ed.), The Explanation of Culture Change, London, Duckworth, 1973
164. C. Renfrew, “The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: Archaeology as Anthropology?�?, American Journal of Archaeology, 1980, vol. 84, pp. 287-98
165. C. Renfrew, Approaches to Social Archaeology, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1984
166. C. Renfrew and P. Bahn, Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice, London, Thames and Hudson, 1991.
167. A. Wylie, “The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender,�? American Antiquity, 1992, vol. 57, p. 23.
168. N. C. Wilkie and W. D. E. Coulson, “Preface�?, in N. C. Wilkie and W D. E Coulson (eds), Contributions to Aegean Archaeology: Studies in Honor of William A. McDonald, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1985, p. xvi, quoting William McDonald.
169. I. Hodder, Symbols in Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982.
170. I. Hodder, “Postprocessual Archaeology,�? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 1985, vol. 8, pp. 1-26
171. I. Hodder, Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1986
172. I. Hodder, Theory and Practice in Archaeology, New York, Routledge, 1992 (especially pp. 86-9)
173. E. Engelstad, “Images of Power and Contradiction: Feminist Theory and Post-processual Archaeology,�? Antiquity, 1991, vol. 65, pp. 502-14
174. Michael Shanks and Christopher Tilley: See their Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987
175. Hays, “When Is a Symbol Archaeologically Meaningful?�?, p. 88, n. 1
176. Renfrew and Bahn, Archaeology, pp. 345, 426-34
177. B. G. Trigger, A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 294-319, 348-57.
178. M. Shanks and I. Hodder, “Processual, Postprocessual and Interpretive Archaeologies,�? in I. Hodder, M. Shanks, and A. Alexandri et al. (eds), Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past, New York, Routledge, 1995, pp. 4-5.
179. S. Harding, The Science Question in Feminism, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1986.
180. E. F. Keller, Reflections on Gender and Science, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1985
181. J. H. Kelley and M. P. Hanen, Archaeology and the Methodology of Science, Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, 1988.
182. A. Wylie, “The Constitution of Archaeological Evidence: Gender Politics and Science,�? in P. Galison and D. J. Stump (eds) The Disunity of Science, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1996.
183. J. Molino, “Archaeology and Symbol Systems,�? in J.-C. Gardin and C. S. Peebles (eds), Representations in Archaeology, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1992, p. 23.
184. J. C. Gardin, “Semiotic Trends in Archaeology,�? in Gardin and Peebles, Representations in Archaeology, p. 87.
185. J. Thomas, “After Essentialism: Archaeology, Geography, and Post-modernity,�? Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 1993, vol. 12 (1), p. 4.
186. V. A. Buchli, “Interpreting Material Culture: The Trouble With Text,�? in Hodder, Shanks, and Alexandri, Interpreting Archaeology, pp. 181-93
187. C. Chippindale, “Grammars of Archaeological Design: A Generative and Geometrical Approach to the Form of Artifacts,�? in Gardin and Peebles, Representations in Archaeology, pp. 251-2.
188. J. M. Gero and M. W Conkey, “Preface,�? in Gero and Conkey, Engendering Archaeology, p. xiii.
189. A. Wylie, “Foreword: Gender Archaeology/Feminist Archaeology,�? in E. Bacus, A. W. Barker et al, A Gendered Past: A Critical Bibliography of Gender in Archaeology, Ann Arbor, Museum of Anthropology Publications, 1993, pp. vii-xiii
190. R. Gilchrist, Gender and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Religious Women, New York, Routledge, 1994, pp. 2-8
191. M. W. Conkey. with, S. W. Williams, “Original Narratives: The Political Economy of Gender in Archaeology�?, in di Leonardo, Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge, pp. 102-39.
192. T. Cullen, “Contributions to Feminism in Archaeology,�? American Journal of Archaeology, 1996, vol. 100, pp. 409-14
193. H. du Cros and L. Smith, Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, Canberra, Australian National University, 1993.
194. R. Gilchrist, “Women’s Archaeology? Political Feminism, Gender Theory and Historical Revision,�? Antiquity, 1991, vol. 65, pp. 495-501
195. L. Hurcombe, “Our Own Engendered Species,�? Antiquity, 1995, vol. 69, pp. 87-100
196. E. M. Scott, Those of Little Note: Gender, Race, and Class in Historical Archaeology, Tucson, University of Arizona Press, 1994
197. D. Walde and N. Willows (eds), The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference, Alberta, Calgary University Press, 1991.
198. L. Gibbs, “Identifying Gender Representation in the Archaeological Record: A Contextual Study,�? in I. Hodder, The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987, pp. 79-101
199. A. Stromberg, Male or Female? A Methodological Study of Grave Gifts as Sex-indicators in Iron Age Burials from Athens, Jonsered, P. Astroms Forlag, 1993.
200. M. Whelan, “Gender and Archaeology: Mortuary Studies and the Search for Gender Differentiation,�? in Walde and Willows, The Archaeology of Gender, pp. 358-65.
201. M. N. Cohen and S. Bennett, “Skeletal Evidence for Sex Roles and Gender Hierarchies in Prehistory,�? in Miller, Sex and Gender Hierarchies, pp. 273-96
202. M.-A. Dobres, “Gender and Prehistoric Technology: On the Social Agency of Technical Strategies,�? World Archaeology, 1995, vol. 27, pp. 25-49
203. J. D. Spector, “What This Awl Means: Toward a Feminist Archaeology,�? in Gero and Conkey, Engendering Archaeology, pp. 388-406
204. J. Spector, with C. C. Cavender et al., What This Awl Means: Feminist Archaeology at a Wahpeton Dakota Village, St Paul, Minnesota Historical Society Press, 1993
205. R. Tringham, “Households with Faces: The Challenge of Gender in Prehistoric Architectural Remains,�? in Gero and Conkey, Engendering Archaeology, pp. 93-131.
206. R. Tringham, “Engendered Places in Prehistory,�? Gender, Place, and Culture, 1994, vol. 1, pp. 169-203
207. N. Yoffee and A. Sherratt, “Introduction: The Sources of Archaeological Theory,�? in N. Yoffee and A. Sherratt (eds), Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda? Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 1
208. A. Richlin, “The Ethnographer’s Dilemma and the Dream of a Lost Golden Age,�? in Rabinowitz and Richlin, Feminist Theory, p. 272
209. A. Wylie, “Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Feminist Critiques and Archaeological Challenges�?, in Walde and Willows, The Archaeology of Gender, pp. 17-23
210. B. J. Little, “Consider the Hermaphroditic Mind: Comment on ‘The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender,’�? American Antiquity, 1994, vol. 59, pp. 539-44
211. M. Fotiadis, “What is Archaeology’s ‘Mitigated Objectivism’ Mitigated By? Comments on Wylie,�? American Antiquity, 1994, vol. 59, pp. 545-55.
212. A. Wylie, “On ‘Capturing Facts Alive in the Past’ (Or Present): Response to Fotiadis and to Little,�? American Antiquity, 1994, vol. 59, pp. 556-60.
213. A. Wylie, “A Proliferation of New Archaeologies: Beyond Objectivism and Relativism,�? in Yoffee and Sherratt, Archaeological Theory, p. 22.
214. P. L. Kohl, “Limits to a Post-processual Archaeology (Or, The Dangers of a New Scholasticism),�? in Yoffee and Sherratt, Archaeological Theory, p. 15.
215. L. E. Patrik, “Is There an Archaeological Record?,�? Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 1985, vol. 8, pp. 27-62.
216. P. Culham, “Ten Years After Pomeroy: Studies of the Image and Reality of Women in Antiquity,�? Helios, 1987, vol. 13 (2), pp. 9-30
217. A. Katz, “Ideology and ‘the Status of Women’ in Ancient Greece,�? in R. Hawley and B. Levick (eds), Women in Antiquity: New Assessments, New York, Routledge, 1995, pp. 21-43.
218. S. Blundell, Women in Ancient Greece, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1995
219. A. Cameron and A. Kuhrt (eds), Images of Women in Antiquity, Detroit, Wayne State University Press, 1983.
220. H. P. Foley (ed.), Reflections of Women in Antiquity, New York, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1981.
221. N. B. Kampen, “Between Public and Private: Women as Historical Subjects in Roman Art,�? in S. B. Pomeroy (ed.), Women’s History and Ancient History, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1991.
222. E. C. Keuls, The Reign of the Phallus: Sexual Politics in Ancient Athens, New York, Harper and Row, 1985.
223. J. Peradotto and J. P. Sullivan (eds), Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1984.
224. B. S. Ridgway, “Ancient Greek Women and Art: The Material Evidence,�? American Journal of Archaeology, 1987, vol. 91, pp. 399-409.
225. S. Silberberg-Pierce, “The Muse Restored: Images of Women in Roman Painting,�? Woman’s Art Journal, 1993/4, vol. 14 (2), pp. 28-36.
226. A. Wylie, “Gender Theory and the Archaeological Record: Why Is There No Archaeology of gender?,�? in Gero and Conkey, Engendering Archaeology, pp. 31-5.
227. Lin Foxhall, Studying Gender in Classical Antiquity, forthcoming with Cambridge University Press.
228. P. duBois, Sowing the Body: Psychoanalysis and Ancient Representations of Women, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1988.
229. P. duBois, Centaurs and Amazons: Women and the Pre-history of the Great Chain of Being, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1991.
230. B. Rawson, “From ‘Daily Life’ to ‘Demography’,�? in Hawley and Levick (eds), Women in Antiquity, pp. 1-20.