Developing, maintaining, and renewing the item inventory to support CBT

Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 143-164

  Way, Walter D ^a   Steffen, Manfred ^a   Anderson, Gordon Stephen ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071792471     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612250-14     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Davey, T., & Parshall, C. G. (1995, April). New algorithms for item selection and exposure control with computerized adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
2. Eignor, D. R., Stocking, M. L, Way, W. D., & Steffen, M. (1993). Case studies in computer adaptive test design through simulation (ETS Research Report RR-93-56). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3. Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
4. Forrester, J. W. (1968). Principles of systems. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
5. Kingsbury, G. C., & Zara, A. R. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359-375.
6. Lewis, C., & Sheehan, K. (1990). Using Bayesian decision theory to design a computer mastery test. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 367-386.
7. Lissitz, R. (1997). The New York standardized testing legislation. NOME Quarterly Newsletter, 5(1), 2.
8. Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J. (1998). Some practical examples of computer-adaptive sequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 229-249.
9. Patsula, L. N., & Steffen, M. (1997, April). Maintaining item and test security in a CAT environment: A simulation study. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago.
10. Stocking, M. L. (1987). Two simulated feasibility studies in computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 36, 263-277.
11. Stocking, M. L. (1993). Controlling item exposure rates in a realistic adaptive testing paradigm (ETS Research Report RR-93-2). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
12. Stocking, M. L. (1994). Three practical issues for modern adaptive testing item pools (ETS Research Report RR-94-5). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
13. Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C. (1995a). A new method of controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing (ETS Research Report RR-95-25). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
14. Stocking, M. L., & Lewis, C. (1995b). Controlling item exposure conditional on ability in computerized adaptive testing (ETS Research Report RR-95-24). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
15. Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L. (1993). A method for severely constrained item selection in adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 277-292.
16. Stocking, M. L., Ward, W. C., & Potenza, M. T. (1998). Simulating the use of disclosed items in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 48-68.
17. Swanson, L., & Stocking, M. L. (1993). A model and heuristic for solving very large item selection problems. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 151-166.
18. Sympson, J. B., & Hetter, R. D. (1985, October). Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the Military Testing Association (pp. 973-977). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
19. van der Linden, W. J., & Boekkooi-Timminga, E. (1989). A minimax model for test design with practical constraints. Psychometrika, 54, 237-247.
20. VensimDSS32 VersionS.OC [Computersoftware]. (1998). Harvard, MA: VentanaSystems.
21. Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185-201.