Genetically modified crops: What transboundary harmonization in Europe?

Transboundary Risk Management

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 59-90

  Levidow, Les ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071682644     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. ACRE, 1995, Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment: Annual Report No. 2, 1994/95, Department of the Environment, London, UK
2. Barry, A., 1993, The European Community and European government: Harmonization, mobility and space, Economy and Society, 22(3):314-326
3. Beck, U., 1992, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London, UK
4. Beck, U., 1996, Risk society and the provident state, in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B.Wynne, eds, Risk, Environment and Modernity, Sage, London, UK
5. BSPB, 1998, Guidelines for Growing Newly Developed Herbicide Tolerant Crops, British Society of Plant Breeders, June, Ely, Cambs, UK
6. CBC, 1990, The Impact of New and Impending Regulations on U.K. Biotechnology, Cambridge Biomedical Consultants, Cambridge, UK
7. CEC, 1993, Towards Sustainable Development, 5th Environmental Action Programme; also in Official Journal of the European Communities, C 138 (17 May):5-98
8. CEC, 1997, Agenda 2000: For a Stronger andWiderUnion, published as Bulletin of the European Union, supplement 5/97, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium
9. CEC, 1998a, Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive amending Directive 90/220/EEC, on the Deliberate Release into the Environment ofGenetically ModifiedOrganisms, Official Journal of the European Communities, C 139 (4 May):1-23
10. CEC, 1998b, Glyphosate, Volume 1, Pesticides Safety Directorate/ECCO-Team, Commission of the European Communities, 12.12.98, Brussels, Belgium
11. Chevre, A-M., Eber, F., and Renard, M., 1997, Gene flow from transgenic crops, Nature, 389:924
12. Clydesdale, F.M., ed., 1996, Allergenicity of foods produced by genetic modification, Food Science and Nutrition, 36 (special supplement)
13. Delors, J., 1992, Our Europe: The Community and NationalDevelopment, Verso,London, UK (translated from 1988 French edition)
14. DG-XI, 1995, Draft document on the Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Herbicide Use Linked to the Placing on the Market of Genetically Modified Herbicide-Tolerant Plants, Document XI/763/95, Revision 1 (undated)
15. DG-XI EGBtIRM, 1998, Expert Group on Bt IRM,Working document onMonitoring of ECB Resistance to Transgenic Bt-maize, January, Directorate-General for Environmental Protection, Brussels, Belgium (typescript)
16. Dreyer, M., and Gill, B., 2000, Germany: Continued elite precaution alongside continued public opposition, Journal of Risk Research, 3(3):219-226
17. EC, 1996, Commission Decision 96/281/EC of 3 April 1996 Concerning the Placing on theMarket of Genetically Modified Soybeans., Official Journal of the European Communities, L 107 (30 April):10
18. EC, 1997a, Commission Decision 97/98/EC of 23 January 1997 Concerning the Placing on the Market of Genetically Modified Maize, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 31 (1 February):69-70
19. EC, 1997b, Regulation 97/258/EC of 27 January 1997 Concerning Novel Foods and Novel Food Ingredients, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 43 (14 February):1-6
20. EC, 1997c, Commission Decision Concerning the Placing on the Market of a Genetically Modified Oilseed Rape, in conformity with Council Directive 90/220/EEC, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 164 (6 June):38-39
21. EC, 1997d, Commission Directive 97/35/EC of 18 June Adapting to Technical Progress for the Second Time Council Directive 90/220/EEC, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 169 (27 June):72-73
22. EC, 1998a, Commission Decision Concerning the Placing on the Market of a Genetically ModifiedMaize (Zea mays line 810), pursuant to Council Directive 90/220/EEC,Official Journal of the European Communities, L 131 (5 May):32-33. [Monsanto dossier C/F/95/12-02]
23. EC, 1998b, Council Regulation 1139/98 Concerning the Compulsory Indication on the Labeling of Certain Foodstuffs Produced from Genetically Modified Organisms., Official Journal of the European Communities, L 159 (3 June):4-7 [replaces EC, 1997e]
24. EC, 1998c, Council Directive 98/95 amending [previous directives] on the Common Catalogue of Varieties of Agricultural Plant Species, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 25 (1 February)
25. EC, 2000, Commission Regulation 49/2000 amending Council Regulation 1139/98., Official Journal of the European Communities, L 6 (11 January):13-14
26. EEC, 1970, Directive du Conseil 70/457/CEE concernant le catalogue commun des variétés des espéces de plantes agricoles, J.O. des Communautés europ éen, L 225 (12 octobre):1-6
27. EEC, 1990, Council Directive 90/220/EEC on the Deliberate Release to the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 117 (8 May):15-27
28. EEC, 1991, Council Directive 91/414 Concerning the Placing of Plant Protection Products on the Market, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 230 (19 August):1-32
29. EEC, 1993, Directive 93/71 amending Directive 91/414, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 221 (31 August):27-34
30. ENDS, 1998, The spiralling agenda of agricultural biotechnology, ENDS Report, 283:18-30
31. ENDS, 1999, Overhaul of EC regime for regulating GMOs, ENDS Report, 294:50-52
32. Feenberg, A., 1999, Questioning Technology, Routledge, London, UK
33. FoEE, 1996-1998, various Mailouts, Friends of the Earth Europe Biotechnology Programme, Brussels, Belgium
34. France, 1998, Arreté du 5 février portant modification du Catalogue officiel des espèces et variétés de plantes cultivées en France (semences de maïs), Journal Officiel, 33:2037, 8 February [registration of two varieties based on Ciba's Bt maize, corresponding to EC, 1997a]
35. GATT, 1994, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, GATT Secretariat, http://www.wto.org/, Geneva, Switzerland
36. Gottweis, H., 1998, Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and in the US, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
37. Greenpeace, 1997, From BSE to GMOs: Science, Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle, http://www.greenpeace.org.uk
38. Haniotis, T., 1997, The Economics of Agricultural Biotechnology: Differences and Similarities in the US and the EU, presentation at Integrated Crop Management Conference, 17-18November, Ames, Iowa, by the First Secretary (Agriculture), European Commission Delegation to the US
39. Hilbeck, A., Baumgartner, M., Padruot, M.F., and Bigler, F., 1998, Effects of transgenic Bt corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla carnea, Environmental Entomology, 27(2):480-487
40. Hildebrand, P., 1993, The European Community's environmental policy, 1957-1992, in D. Judge, ed., A Green Dimension for the European Community, Cass, London, UK. [special issue of Environmental Politics, 1(4), 1992]
41. Jasanoff, S., 1993, Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis, Risk Analysis, 13(2):123-129
42. Jordan, T., 1999, The implementation of EU environmental policy: A policy problem without a political solution?, Environment and Planning C, 17(1):69-90
43. Kahn, A., 1996, Evaluation du risque et dissémination volontaire d'organismes génétiquement modifiés: l'expérience francaise, Natures-Sciences-Sociétés Dialogues, 96(2):144-145,NSS Association, Paris, France
44. Levidow, L., 1996, Simulating Mother Nature, industrializing agriculture, in G. Robertson et al. (BLOCK), eds, FutureNatural: Nature, Science, Culture, Routledge, London, UK
45. Levidow, L., 1999, Regulating Bt maize in the USA and Europe: A scientificcultural comparison, Environment, 41(10):10-22
46. Levidow, L., and Carr, S., eds, 1996, Biotechnology Risk Regulation in Europe, special issue of Science & Public Policy, 23(3):133ff
47. Levidow, L., and Carr, S., 2000a, UK: Precautionary commercialization of GM crops?, Journal of Risk Research, 3(3):261-270
48. Levidow, L., and Carr, S., eds, 2000b, Precautionary regulation: GMcrops in the EU, special issue of Journal of Risk Research, 3(3):187-285
49. Levidow, L., and Tait, J., 1991, The greening of biotechnology: GMOs as environment-friendly products, Science and Public Policy, 18(5):271-80
50. reprinted in V. Shiva and I. Moser, eds, 1995, Biopolitics: A Feminist and Ecological Reader on Biotechnology, Zed, London, UK
51. Levidow, L., Carr, S., von Schomberg, R., and Wield, D., 1996, Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe: Harmonization difficulties, opportunities, dilemmas, Science & Public Policy, 23(3):135-157
52. Levidow, L., Carr, S., von Schomberg, R., and Wield, D., 1997, European biotechnology regulation: Framing the risk assessment of a herbicidetolerant crop, Science, Technology and Human Values, 22(4):472-505
53. Levidow, L., Carr, S., andWield, D., 1999a,Market-stage precautions: Managing regulatory disharmonies for transgenic crops in Europe, AgBiotechNet, 1:1-8, http://www.agbiotechnet.com/reviews/April99/Html/Levidow.htm
54. Levidow, L., Carr, S., and Wield, D., 1999b, Regulating biotechnological risk, straining Britain's consultative style, Journal of Risk Research, 2(4): 307-324
55. Magretta, J., 1997, Growth through global sustainability: An interview with Monsanto's CEO, Robert Shapiro, Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb: 79-88
56. Majone, G., 1996, Regulating Europe, Routledge, London, UK
57. Majone, G., 1997, From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance, Journal of Public Policy, 17:139-167
58. Mantegazzini, M.C., 1986, The Environmental Risks from Biotechnology, Pinter, London, UK
59. McMichael, P., 1998, Global food politics, Monthly Review, 50(3):97-111
60. McNally, R., 1994, Genetic madness: The European rabies eradication programme, The Ecologist, 24(6):207-212
61. McNally, R., 1996, Political problems: Genetically engineered solutions: The socio-technical translation of fox rabies, in Ad van Dommelen (ed.), Coping with Deliberate Release: The Limits of Risk Assessment, International Centre for Human and Public Affairs, Hengelo, Netherlands
62. Monsanto, 1997, Report on Sustainable Development, Monsanto Company, St. Louis,MO, USA
63. Mikkelsen, T.R., et al., 1996, The risk of crop transgene spread, Nature, 380:31
64. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 1986, Recombinant DNA Safety Considerations, OECD, Paris, France
65. Pelkmans, J., 1987, The new approach to technical harmonization and standardization, Journal of Common Market Studies, 25(3):249-69
66. PGS, 1994, A New Hybridization System in Oilseed Rape (B. napus): Application for Consent to Market Genetically Modified Organisms, ref. no. C/U.K./94/M1/1, unpublished document, submitted to by Plant Genetic Systems to DoE, February
67. RCEP, 1998, 21st Report: Setting Environmental Standards, Cm 4053, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, UK
68. Renn, O., 1995, Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative analysis, Science & Public Policy, 22(3):147-156
69. Renn, O., and Levine, D., 1991, Credibility and trust in risk communication, in R. Kasperson and P.J. Stallen, eds, Communicating Risk to the Public, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
70. Roy, A., and Joly, P-B., 2000, France: Broadening precautionary expertise?, Journal of Risk Research, 3(3):247-254
71. SCAN, 1996, Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Nutrition on the safety for animals of certain genetically modified maize lines notified by Ciba-Geigy, DGVI, 13 December
72. SCF, 1996, Scientific Committee on Food, Opinion on the potential for adverse health effects from the consumption of genetically modified maize, DGIII, 13 December
73. SCP, 1996, Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Pesticides on the genetically modified maize lines notified by Ciba-Geigy, DGVI, 13 December
74. SCP, 1998a, Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Plants regardingMonsanto's MON10 Bt maize (C/F/95/12-02), 10 February. Full texts available at http://europa.eu.int/en/comm/dg24
75. SCP, 1998b, Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Plants regarding Pioneer's MON9 Bt, glyphosate-tolerant maize, 19 May
76. Spain, 1998, Ministerio de Agricultura, Orden de 23 de marzo por la que se dispone la inscripción de variedades de maz en el Registro de Variedades Comerciales, 26 marzo, Boletin Oficial del Estado, 73:10193-95, 10289-90 [registration of two varieties based on Ciba's Bt maize, corresponding to EC, 1997a]
77. Stern, P.C., and Fineberg, V., 1996, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, National Research Council, Committee on Risk Characterization, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA
78. Terragni, F., and Recchia, E., 1998, Italy: Precaution for environmental diversity?, Report on Italy, Safety Regulation of Transgenic Crops: Completing the Internal Market?, coordinated by the Open University, MiltonKeynes, UK
79. Todt, O., and Lujan, J., 2000, Spain: Commercialization drives public debate and precaution, Journal of Risk Research, 3(3):237-245
80. Toft, J., 1996, Denmark: Seeking a broad-based consensus on gene technology, Science & Public Policy, 23(3):171-174
81. Toft, J., 2000, Denmark-Potential polarization or consensus?, Journal of Risk Research, 3(3):227-235
82. Torgersen, H., and Seifert, F., 2000, Austria: Precautionary blockage of agricultural biotechnology, Journal of Risk Research, 3(3):209-217
83. Vogel, D., 1997, Barriers or Benefits? Regulation in Transatlantic Trade, Brookings Institution,Washington, DC, USA
84. von Schomberg, R., ed., 1998, Democratizing Technology: Theory and Practice of a Deliberative Technology Policy, International Centre for Human and Public Affairs, Hengelo, Netherlands
85. Wynne, B., 1998, Does Europe Have to be Reductionist?, paper delivered at the SPSG/ESRC Conference, March