Improving student-centered feedback through self-assessment

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 83, Issue , 2019, Pages

  Piper, Katie ^a   Morphet, Julia ^a   Bonnamy, James ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONVENIENCE SAMPLE; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NURSING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SELF EVALUATION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TRUST; VICTORIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MULTICENTER STUDY; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; SELF-ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS, NURSING; VICTORIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85071681429     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: 15322793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3:2 (2006), 77–101, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
2. Brown, G.T.L., Andrade, H.L., Chen, F., Accuracy in student self-assessment: directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education: Princples, Policy and Practice 22:4 (2015), 4444–4457, 10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523.
3. Creswell, J., Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2009, Sage Publications, Singapore.
4. Fetters, M.D., Curry, L.A., Creswell, J., Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: principles and practices. Health Serv. Res. 48:6 part 2 (2013), 2134–2156, 10.1111/1475-6773.12117.
5. Flores, M.A., Veiga Simão, A.M., Barros, A., Pereira, D., Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: a study in higher education. Stud. High. Educ. 40:9 (2015), 1523–1534, 10.1080/03075079.2014.881348.
6. Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E., Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15:9 (2005), 1277–1288, 10.1177/1049732305276687.
7. IBM Corporation. (2012). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (Version 23). Armonk, New York, USA.
8. Iwamoto, D., Hargis, J., Bordner, R., & Chandler, P. (2017). Self-regulated learning as a critical attribute for succesful teaching and learning, International Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11 (2). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110207.
9. Khusainova, R.M., & Ivutina, H.P. (2016). Style of self-regulation of learning activities of university students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11 (13). 5980–5992.
10. Lew, M.D.N., Alwis, W.A.M., Schmidt, H.G., Accuracy of students' self-assessment in their beliefs about its utility. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 35:2 (2010), 135–156, 10.1080/02602930802687737.
11. Ning, H.K., Downing, K., Influence of student learning experience on academic performance: the mediator and moderator effects of self-regulation and motivation. Br. Educ. Res. J. 38:2 (2012), 219–237 https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.538468.
12. Orsmond, P., Maw, S.J., Park, J.R., Gomez, S., Crook, A.C., Moving feedback forward: theory to practice. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 38:2 (2013), 240–252, 10.1080/02602938.2011.625472.
13. Pallant, J., SPSS Survival Manual. 5th ed., 2013, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, Australia.
14. Pereira, D., Flores, M.A., Simão, A.M.V., Barros, A., Effectiveness and relevance of feedback in Higher Education: a study of undergraduate students. Stud. Educ. Eval. 49 (2016), 7–14, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.004.
15. Polit, D., Beck, C., (eds.) Essentials of Nursing Research; Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice, 4th ed., 2014, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Sydney, Australia.
16. Ramsden, P., Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge Falmer ProQuest EbookCentral 18:1 (1991), 105–111 https://ebookcentral-proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/lib/monash/detail.action?docID=170018.
17. Siles-Gonzalez, J., Solano-Ruiz, C., Self-assessment, relfection on practice and critical thinking in nursing students. Nurse Educ. Today 45 (2016), 132–137 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.07.005.
18. Tan, K.H.K., Does student self-assessment empower or discipline students?. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 29:6 (2004), 651–662, 10.1080/0260293042000227209.
19. Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A., Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2009, SAGE Publications, London.
20. Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory into Practice, 41 (2), 64–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.