A technology-based authoring system for assessment

Instructional Design: International Perspectives: Volume 2: Solving Instructional Design Problems

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 113-133

  O’Neil, Harold F ^a,b   Baker, Eva L ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b National Center for Research on Evaluation Standards and Student Testing   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071594459     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315044743-14     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Advanced Technology, Inc. (1989). Manager’s guide, to new training technologies. Reston, VA: Author.
2. Ager, T. (1993). Online placement testing in mathematics and chemistry, journal of Qmputer-Based Instruction, 20(2), 52-57.
3. Alessi, S. M. (1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 15(1), 40-47.
4. Baker, E. L., Niemi, D., & Herl, H. (1994). Using HyperCard technology to measure understanding. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 133-152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Baker, E. L., & O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (1994a). Performance assessment and equity: a view from the USA. Assessment in Education, 1(1), 11-26. [To be reprinted in M. B. Kane (Ed.), Implementing performance assessment: Promises, problems, and chalhmges. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]
6. Baker, E. L., & O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (Eds.). (1994b). Technology assessment in education and training. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Baker, E. L., & O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (1995). Computer technology futures for the improvement of assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology 4(1), 37-45.
8. Baker, E. L., O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Linn, R. (1990). Performance assessment framework. In S. J. Andriole (Ed.), Advanced technology for command and control systems engineering (pp. 192-213). Fairfax, VA: AFCEA International Press.
9. Baker, E. L., O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Linn, R. L. (1992). What works in alternative assessment�? Sherman Oaks, CA: Advance Design Information, Inc.
10. Baker, E. L., O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Linn, R. L. (1993). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment. American Psychologist 48, 1210-1218.
11. Baker, F. B. (1989). Computer technology in test construction and processing. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 409-428). New York: Macmillan.
12. Bennett, R. E., & Sebrechts, M. M. (1996). The accuracy of expert-system diagnoses of mathematical problem solutions. Applied Measurement in Education 9(2), 133-150.
13. Braun, H. I. (1994). Assessing technology in assessment. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 231-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B. (1989). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 367-408). New York: Macmillan.
15. Dunn, T. G, Lushene, R., & O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (1972). The complete automation of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 381-387.
16. Fletcher, J. D. (1990). Effectiveness and cost of interactive videodisc instruction in defense training and education (IDA Paper P-2372). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
17. Flexman, R. E., & Stark, E. A. (1987). Training simulators. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 1012-1038). New York: Wiley.
18. Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., &Yekovich, F. R. (1993). ‘The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
19. Glaser, R., & Raghavan, K. (1992). Cognitive theory as the basis for design of innovative assessment: Design characteristics of science, assessments (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 349). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
20. Golas, K. C, & Shriver, S. (1991). Revision of the. Air Force instructional system development process. Baseline analysis report (Contract No. F42650-87-D-0026). San Antonio, TX: Southwest Research Institute.
21. Goldman, S. R., Pellegrino, J. W., & Bransford, J. (1994). Assessing programs that invite thinking. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 199-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Green, B. F. (1991). Guidelines for computer testing. In T. B. Gutkin & S. L. Wise (Eds.), The comfmter and the decision-making process (pp. 245-273). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Green, B. F. (1992). Testing technology. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., pp. 1410-1414). New York: Macmillan.
24. Gutkin, T. B., & Wise, S. L. (Eds.). (1991). The computer and the decision-making process (Buros-Nebraska Symposium on Measurement and Testing). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Haladyna, T. M. (1994). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Hedl, J. J., Jr., O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Hansen, D. N. (1973). The affective reactions toward computer-based intelligence testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 40, 310-324.
27. Kane, M. B., & Mitchell, R. (Eds.). (1996). Implementing performance assessment. Promises, problems, and challenges. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Li, Z. (1988, April). Knowledge engineering report: An expert system for selecting reliability index (ONR Contract No. N00014-86-K-0395). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Technology Assessment/Center for the Study of Evaluation.
29. Li, Z., O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Baker, E. L. (1991, August). Developing a research reference interface for knowledge-based design tools. Educational Technology, pp. 7-16.
30. Linn, R. L. (1992). Measurement in education. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., pp. 798-805). New York: Macmillan.
31. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher 20(8), 15-21.
32. Merrill, M. D. (1993). An integrated model for automating instructional design and delivery. Inj. M. Spector, M. C. Poison, & D.J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design (pp. 147-190). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
33. Montague, W. E., & Knirk, F. G. (Eds.). (1993). What works in adult instruction: The management, design and delivery of instruction [Special issue]. International Journal of Educational Research, 9(4).
34. Munro, A., & Pizzini, Q. A. (1996). RIDES reference manual (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Behavioral Technology Laboratories.
35. Muraida, D. J., Spector, J. M., O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Marlino, M. R. (1993). Evaluation. In j. M. Spector, M. C. Poison, & D. J. Muraida (Eds.), Automating instructional design. Concepts and issues (pp. 293-321). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
36. Nitko, A. J. (1989). Designing tests that are integrated with instruction. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 447-474). New York: Macmillan.
37. NPRDC. (1988). What works: Summary of research findings with implications for Navy instruction and learning. Pensacola, FL: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
38. O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (Ed.). (1979a). Issues in instructional systems develofmenl. New York: Academic Press.
39. O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (Ed.). (1979b). Procedures for instructional systems development. New York: Academic Press.
40. O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (Ed.). (1981). Computer-based instruction. A state-of-the-art assessment. New York: Academic Press.
41. O’Neil, H. F., Jr., Allred, K., & Dennis, R. A. (in press-a). Use of computer simuladon for assessing the interpersonal skill of negotiation. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Workforce readiness: Competencies and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. O’Neil, H. F., Jr., Allred, K., & Dennis, R. A. (in press-b). Validation of a computer simulation for assessment of interpersonal skills. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Workforce readiness: Competencies and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Baker, E. L. (1991). Issues in intelligent computer-assisted instruction: Evaluation and measurement. In T. B. Gutkin & S. L. Wise (Eds.), The computer and the decision-making process (pp. 199-224). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Baker, E. L. (Eds.). (1994). Technology assessment: In software applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Brown, R. S. (in press). Differential effects of question formats in math assessment on metacognition and affect. Applied Measurement in Education.
46. O’Neil, H. F., Jr., Chung, G, & Brown, R. (in press). Use of networked simulations as a context to measure team competencies. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Workforce readiness: Competencies and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. O’Neil, H. F., Jr., Hedl, J. J., Jr., Richardson, F. C, &Judd, W. A. (1976). An affective and cognitive evaluation of computer-managed instruction. Educational Technology 16, 29-34.
48. O’Neil, H. F., Jr., & Robertson, M. (1992). Simulations: Occupationally oriented. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (6th ed., pp. 1216-1222). New York: Macmillan.
49. Reigeluth, C. M., & Schwartz, E. (1989). An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 76(16), 1-10.
50. Roid, G, & Haladyna, T. (1982). A technology for test item writing. New York: Academic Press.
51. Spector, J. M., Poison, M. C, & Muraida, D.J. (Eds.). (1993). Automating instructional design. Concepts and issues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
52. SPSS Inc. (1988). SPSS-X user’s guide (3rd ed.). Chicago: Author.
53. Towne, D. M. (1995). Learning and instruction in simulation environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
54. U.S. Air Force. (1992). AF Manual 50-2. Washington, DC: Department of the Air Force.
55. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1992, February). Testing in American schools: Asking the right questions (OTA-SET-519). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
56. U.S. Department of Education. (1986). What works. Research about teaching and learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
57. U.S. Department of Education. (1987). What works. Research about teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
58. Wetzel, C. D., Radtke, P. H., amp; Stern, H. W. (1994). Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.