When poststructuralism meets gender

Governing the Child in the New Millennium

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 259-289

  McLeod, Julie ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071590737     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203614525-15     Document Type: Chapter

References (115)

1. Alcoff, L. (1988). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 13 (3), 405-36.
2. Alloway, N. (1995). Foundation stones: The construction of gender in early childhood. Carlton, Vic, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.
3. Alloway, N., & Gilbert, P. (1997). Boys and literacy: Lessons from Australia. Gender and Education, 9 (1), 49-58.
4. Anyon, J. (1994). The retreat of Marxism and socialist feminism: Postmodern and poststructural theories in education. Curriculum Inquiry, 24 (2), 115-33.
5. Apple, M. (1995). Review of Rethinking the school: Subjectivity, bureaucracy, criticism, by Ian Hunter. Australian Journal of Education, 39 (1), 95-96.
6. Australian Education Council (1993). National action plan for the education of girls 1993- 97. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.
7. Baker, B. (1998). “Childhood�? in the emergence and spread of U.S. public schools. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan, M. (Eds.), Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 117-43). New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Ball, S. (Ed.) (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
9. Baron, S., Finn, D., Grant, N., Green, M., & Johnson, R. (1981). Unpopular education: Schooling and social democracy in England since 1944. London: Hutchinson, in associ-ation with the Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
10. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.
11. Beechey, V, & Donald, J. (Eds.) (1985). Subjectivity and social relations. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
12. Belenky, M. F., McVicker, B. C, Goldberger, M. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways ofknowing: The development ofself, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
13. Blair, M., Holland, J., & Sheldon, S. (Eds.) (1995). Identity and diversity: Gender and the experience of education. Clevedon, UK: Open University Press.
14. Butler, J. (1995). Contingent foundations. In S. Benhabib, J. Butler, C. Cornell, & N. Fraser, Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. New York: Routledge.
15. Cherryholmes, C. (1988). Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Cherryholmes, C., Symes, C., Yates, L., & Hunter, I. (1995). Review symposium: Rethinking the school with the help of Michel Foucault. Australian Educational Researcher, 22 (1), 107-29.
17. Collins, C., Batten, M., Ainley, J., & Getty, C. (1996). Gender and school education. Can-berra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs.
18. Collins, C., Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2000). Factors influencing educational performance of males and females at school and their initial destinations after leaving school. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
19. Commonwealth Schools Commission (1975). Girls, school and society: Report by a study group to the schools commission. Canberra.
20. Commonwealth Schools Commission (1984). Girls and tomorrow: The challenge for schools. Report of the Working Party on the Education ofGirls. Canberra.
21. Commonwealth Schools Commission (1987). The national policy for the education ofgirls in Australian schools. Canberra.
22. Connell, R. W. (1983). The concept of role and what to do with it. In his Which way is up: Essays on class, sex and culture (pp. 189-200). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
23. Connell, R. W. (1997). Teaching the boys: New research on masculinity, and gender strategies for schools. Teachers College Record, 98 (2), 206-35.
24. Davies, B. (1989a). The discursive production of the male/female dualism in school settings. Oxford Review of Education, 15 (3), 229-41.
25. Davies, B. (1989b). Frogs and snails andfeminist tales: Pre-school children and gender. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
26. Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Syd-ney: Allen & Unwin.
27. Davies, B. (1997). Critical literacy in practice: Language lessons for and about boys. Interpretations, 30 (2), 36-57.
28. Dean, M. (1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. New York: Routledge.
29. Department of Education, Employment and Training (1992). Femininity and reality: Factors that affect girls learning. A Project of National Significance. Canberra.
30. Donald, J. (1992). Sentimental education: Schooling, popular culture and liberty. London: Verso.
31. Dussel, I. (1999, April). Foucault’s conception of history: Reflections on the use(s) of genealogy. Paper presented at the annual meeting ofthe American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
32. Edwards, A. (1983). Sex roles: A problem for sociology and for women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 19 (3), 385-412.
33. Eisenstein, H. (1991). Gender shock: Practising feminism on two continents. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
34. Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Hey, V, & Maw, J. (Eds.) (1998). Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
35. Fendler, L. (1998). What is it impossible to think? A genealogy ofthe educated subject. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault’s challenge:Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 39-63). New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-9). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Foucault, M. (1984a). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 76-100). New York: Pantheon Books.
38. Foucault, M. (1984b). The history ofsexuality: An introduction. Trans. R. Hurley. Har- mondsworth: Penguin.
39. Foucault, M. (1985). Sexuality and solitude. In M. Blonsky (Ed.), On signs: A semiotic reader (pp. 365-72). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
40. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies ofthe self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16-49). London: Tavistock Publications.
41. Fowler, R. (1983, September). Sexually-inclusive curriculum. Victorian Teacher, pp. 15-19.
42. Franzway, S., Court, D., & Connell, R. W. (1989). Staking a claim: Feminism, bureaucracy and the state. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
43. Fraser, N. (1997) Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist�? condition. New York: Routledge.
44. Gilbert, P. (1996). Talking about gender: Terminology used in the education ofgirls policy area and implications for policy priorities and programs. Canberra: Department of Employ-ment, Education and Training.
45. Gilbert, P. (1997). Gender and schooling in new times: The challenge of boys and literacy. Australian Educational Researcher, 25 (1), 15-36.
46. Gilbert, P., & Taylor, S. (1989). Fashioning the feminine: Girls, popular culture and schooling. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
47. Gilbert, R., & Gilbert, P. (1994). Analysing gender and disadvantage: Theoretical perspectives. A Gender Equity in Curriculum Reform Project, Department of Employment, Education and Training. Canberra.
48. Gilbert, R., & Gilbert, P. (1998). Masculinity goes to school. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
49. Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47 (4), 481-517.
50. Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics ofeducation. New York: Routledge.
51. Gore, J. (1993) The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes oftruth. New York: Routledge.
52. Hall, S. (1981). Cultural studies: Two paradigms. In T. Bennett (Ed.), Culture, ideology and social process (pp. 19-33). London: Open University Press.
53. Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1984). Changingthe subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
54. Henry, M., & Taylor, S. (1999). Conceptualisation, funding and monitoring programs relating to educational equity and disadvantage in Australian schools. Unpublished report, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
55. Hultqvist, K. (1998). A history of the present on children’s welfare in Sweden: From Frobel to present-day decentralization projects. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 92-116). New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
56. Hunter, I. (1991). Personality as vocation: The political rationality ofthe humanities. In I. Hunter, D. Meredyth, B. Smith, & G. Stokes, Accountingfor the humanities: The language of culture and the logic of government (pp. 7-67). Griffith University, Australia: Institute for Cultural Policy Studies.
57. Hunter, I. (1992, Spring). The humanities without humanism. Meanjin, 3, 479-90.
58. Hunter, I. (1993). Mind games and body techniques. Southern Review, 26 (2), 172-85.
59. Hunter, I. (1994) Rethinking the school: Subjectivity bureaucracy criticism. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
60. Hunter, I., Meredyth, D., Smith, B., & Stokes, G. (1991). Accounting for the humanities: The language of culture and the logic of government. Griffith University, Brisbane: Institute for Cultural Policy Studies.
61. Johnson, L. (1990, Autumn). Gender issues and education. Australian Feminist Studies, 11, 17-27.
62. Johnson, L. (1993). The modern girl: Girlhood and growing up. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
63. Jones, K., & Williamson, K. (1979). The birth ofthe classroom. Ideology and Conscious-ness, 5-6, 59-110.
64. Kamler, B., Maclean, R., Reid, J-A., & Simpson, A. (1994). Shaping up nicely: The formation of schoolgirls and schoolboys in the first month of school. Canberra: Gender Equity and Curriculum Reform Project, DEET.
65. Kenway, J. (with Willis, S., Blackmore, J., & Rennie, L.) (1993). Learning from girls: What can girls teach feminist teachers? Melbourne Studies in Education, 63-77.
66. Kenway, J. (1997). Taking stock ofgender reform policies for Australian schools: Past, present and future. British Educational Research Journal, 23 (3), 329-44.
67. Kenway, J., & Willis, S. (with the Education of Girls Unit of South Australia) (1993). Telling tales: Girls and schools changing their ways. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Training.
68. Kenway, J., & Willis, S. (1995). Critical visions: Rewriting the future ofwork, schooling and gender. Canberra: Department ofEmployment, Education and Training.
69. Kenway, J., & Willis, S. (with Blackmore, J., & Rennie, L.) (1997). Answeringback: Girls, boys and feminism in schools. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
70. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. London: Routledge.
71. Lingard, B., & Douglas, P. (1999). Men engaging feminisms: Pro-feminism, backlashes and schooling. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
72. Luke, A., & Luke, C. (1990). School knowledge as simulation: Curriculum in post-modern conditions. Discourse, 10 (2), 75-91.
73. Luke, C., & Gore., J. (Eds.) (1992). Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
74. Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: Univer-sity ofMinnesota Press.
75. Marshall, J. (1989). Foucault and education. Australian Journal ofEducation, 33 (2), 99-113.
76. Martino, W. (1999). “Cool boys,�? “party animals,�? “squids�? and “poofters�?: Interro-gating the dynamics and politics of adolescent masculinities in school. British Jour-nal ofthe Sociology ofEducation, 20 (2), 239-63.
77. McInnes, S. (1996). Girls, schools… and boys: Promoting gender equity through schools: Twenty years ofgender equity policy development (Report ofthe Social Policy Group Research Paper, number 24). Canberra: Department ofthe Parliamentary Library.
78. McLean, C. (1997). Engaging with boys’ experiences of masculinity: Implications for gender reform. In J. Kenway (Ed.), Will boys be boys? Boys’ education in the context ofgender reform (pp. 13-16). Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
79. McLeod, J. (1993). Impossible fictions? Utopian visions and feminist educational re-search. Melbourne Studies in Education, 107-17.
80. McLeod, J. (1996). Regulating gender: Feminist truths and educational reform in Victoria since 1975. Ph.D. thesis, La Trobe University.
81. McLeod, J. (1998a). Out of the comfort zone: Feminism after the backlash. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics ofeducation, 19 (3), 371-78.
82. McLeod, J. (1998b). Reforms, response and reality: Gender, schooling and feminism. In J. Allen (Ed.), Sociology ofeducation: Possibilities and practices (pp. 141-67). Ka- toomba, NSW: Social Sciences Press.
83. McLeod, J. (1998c). The promise of freedom and the regulation of gender-feminist pedagogy in the 1970s. Gender and Education, 10 (4), 431-45.
84. McNay, L. (1992). Foucault and feminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
85. Meanjin (1992, Spring). Special Issue, “Culture, Policy and Beyond.�?.
86. Meredyth, D., & Tyler, D. (Eds.) (1993). Child and citizen: Genealogies of schooling and subjectivity. Griffith University, Australia: Institute for Cultural Policy Studies.
87. Middleton, S. (1998). Disciplining sexuality: Foucault, life histories, and education. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
88. Millet, K. (1972). Sexual politics. London: Abacus, Sphere Books.
89. Milligan, S., & Thomson, K., Ashendon, D. (1992). Listening to girls: A report ofthe consultancy undertaken for the Australian Education Council Committee to review the national policy for the education ofgirls in Australian schools. Carlton, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.
90. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (1997). Gender equity: A framework for Australian schools. Canberra.
91. Office of Schools Administration (1990). A fair go for all: Guidelines for gender-inclusive curriculum. Victoria: Ministry ofEducation.
92. O’Malley, P., Weir, L, & Spearing, C. (1997). Governmentality, criticism, politics. Econ-omy and Society, 26 (4), 501-17.
93. Peters, M. (1996). Post-structuralism, politics andeducation. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
94. Popkewitz, T. S. (1998a). The culture ofredemption and the administration offreedom as research. Review ofEducational Research, 68 (1), 1-34.
95. Popkewitz, T. S. (1998b). Struggling for the soul: The politics ofschooling and the construction ofthe teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
96. Popkewitz, T. S. (in press). National imaginaries, the indigenous foreigner, and power: Comparative educational research. In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Discourseformation in com-parative education. Berlin: Peter Lang Verlag.
97. Popkewitz, T. S., & Brennan, M. (Eds.) (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
98. Pringle, R., & Watson, S. (1992). “Women’s interests�? and the post-structuralist state. In M. Barrett & A. Phillips (Eds.), Destabilizing theory: Contemporary feminist debates (pp. 53-73). Cambridge: Polity Press.
99. Roman, L. G., & Eyre, L. (Eds.) (1997). Dangerous territories: Struggles for difference and equality in education. New York: Routledge.
100. Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping ofthe private self. London: Routledge.
101. Schrag, F. (1999). Why Foucault now? Journal ofCurriculum Studies, 31 (4), 375-83.
102. Suggett, D. (1987). Inclusive curriculum: A gain or loss for girls? Curriculum Perspectives, 7 (1), 69-74.
103. Tapper, M. (1993). Ressentiment and power; Some reflections on feminist practices. In P. Patton (Ed.), Nietzsche, feminism and political theory (pp. 130-43). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
104. Tyler, D. (1993). “Going like a boy�?: Making up girls in the 1930s kindergarten. Australian Historical Studies, 25 (100), 357-70.
105. Walkerdine, V. (1984). Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early childhood development. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine, Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 153-202). London: Methuen.
106. Walkerdine, V (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.
107. Walkerdine, V. (1992). Progressive pedagogy and political struggle. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp.15-24). New York: Routledge.
108. Watson, S. (Ed.) (1990). Playing the state: Australian feminist interventions. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
109. Wexler, P., Miller, J., Brown, A., & Dowling, P., (1994-1995). Governing the school [responses to Hunter’s “Rethinking the School�?]. Arena, 4, 161-200.
110. Yates, L. (1993a). Feminism and Australian state policy; Some questions for the 1990s. In M. Arnot & K. Weiler (Eds.), Feminism and social justice in education: Intentional perspectives (pp. 167-85). London: Falmer Press.
111. Yates, L. (1993b). The education of girls: Policy, research and the question of gender. Melbourne: ACER.
112. Yates, L. (1993c). Feminism and education: Writing in the '90s. Melbourne Studies in Education, pp. 1-9.
113. Yates, L. (1997). Gender equity and boys debate: What sort ofchallenge is it? British Journal ofthe Sociology ofEducation, 18 (3), 337-47.
114. Yates, L. (1998). Constructing and deconstructing “girls�? as a category ofconcern. In A. MacKinnnon, I. Elqvist-Saltzman, & A. Prentice (Eds.), Education into the 21st century; Dangerous terrain for women? (pp. 155-67). London: Falmer Press.
115. Yeatman, A. (1990). Bureaucrats, technocrats, femocrats: Essays on the contemporary Australian state. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.