Research-supported characteristics of teachers and schools that promote reading achievement

Teaching Reading: Effective Schools, Accomplished Teachers

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 361-373

  Taylor, Barbara M ^a   Pressley, Michael ^b   Pearson, P David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071556775     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612489-25     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Brophy, J. (1973). Stability of teacher effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 10, 245-252.
2. Campbell, J.R., Donahue, P.L., Reese, C.M., & Phillip, G.W. (1996). NAEP 1994 reading report card for the nation and the states. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
3. Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E.J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
4. Charles A.Dana Center, University of Texas at Austin. (1999). Hope for urban education: A study of nine high-performing, high-poverty urban elementary schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
5. Designs for Change. (1998). Practices of schools with substantially improved reading achievement. Chicago Public Schools, www.dfc1.org/summary/report.htm
6. Donahue, P.L., Voelkl, K.E., Campbell, J.R., & Mazzeo, J. (1999). NAEP 1998 reading report card for the nation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
7. Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M.S., Vavrus, L.G., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 347-368.
8. Dunkin, M., & Biddle, B. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
9. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15-27.
10. Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teacher behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11. Hoffman, J.V. (1991). Teacher and school effects in learning to read. In R.Barr, M.L.Kamil, P.B.Mosenthal, & P.D.Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 911-950). New York: Longman.
12. Knapp, M.S., and Associates. (1995). Teaching for meaning in high-poverty classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Lein, L., Johnson, J.F., & Ragland, M. (1997). Successful Texas schoolwide programs: Research study results. Austin, TX: Charles A.Dana Center, University of Texas at Austin.
14. Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford.
15. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C.C., Morrow, L., Tracey, D., Baker, K., Brooks, G., Cronin, J., Nelson, E., & Woo, D. (2001). A study of effective first-grade literacy instruction. Scientific studies of reading, 5, 35-58.
17. Puma, M.J., Karweit, N., Price, C., Ricciuiti, A., Thompson, W., & Vaden-Kiernan, M. (1991). Prospects: Final report on student outcomes. (Title I) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service.
18. Roehler, L.R., & Duffy, G.G. (1984). Direct explanation of comprehension processes. In G. G.Duffy, L.R.Roehler, & J.Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions, (pp. 265-280). New York: Longman.
19. Rosenshine, B.V. (1979). Content, time, and direct instruction. In P.L.Peterson & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications, (pp. 28-56). Berkeley, CA.: McCutchan.
20. Snow, C.E., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children: Report of the Committee on the Prevention of Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Soar, R.S., & Soar, R.M. (1979). Emotional climate and management. In P.L.Peterson & H. J.Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
22. Stallings, J., & Kaskowitz, D. (1974). Follow through classroom observation evaluation 1972-73 (SRI Project URU-7370). Stanford, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
23. Taylor, B.M., Pearson, P.D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (1999). Beating the Odds in Teaching All Children to Read. (CIERA Report # 2-006) Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement, University of Michigan. This report is also being published as Effective Schools/Accomplished Teachers: Lessons about Primary Grade Reading Instruction in Low-Income Schools, The Elementary School Journal, 101, November, 2000, 121-165.
24. Venezky, R.L., & Winfield, L. (1979). Schools that succeed beyond expectations in teaching reading (Technical Report No. 1). Newark, DE: Department of Educational Studies, University of Delaware.
25. Weber, G. (1971). Inner city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools (CGE Occasional Papers No. 18). Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ed 057 125)
26. Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., & Hampston, J. (1998). Outstanding literacy instruction in first grade: Teacher practices and student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 99, 101-128.
27. Wilder, G. (1977). Five exemplary reading programs. In J.T.Guthrie (Ed.), Cognition, curriculum, and comprehension, (pp. 57-68). Newark, DE : International Reading Association.