Academic language development in Latino students’ writing in Spanish

Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning With Power

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 67-86

  Colombi, M Cecilia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071524774     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612298-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Bialystok, E. (1991). Language processing in bilingual children. New York: University of Cambridge.
2. Burdach, A. M., Millan, A. M., & Tonselli, M. (1994). Aplicacion del modelo de conjuncion como recurso de cohesion de Halliday y Hasan a una muestra del espanol [Application of the Halliday and Hasan conjunction model as a resource of cohesion to a Spanish sample]. Revista del Instituto de Letras de la Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, 19, 167-180
3. Casanave, C. E (1994). Language development in students’ journals.Journal of Second Language Writing, 3 (3), 179-201.
4. Christie, F. (1986). Writing in schools: Generic structures as ways of meaning. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives (pp. 221-239). London:Frances Pinter.
5. Colombi, C. (1997). Perfil del discurso escrito en textos de hispanohablantes: Teoria y practica [Profile of the written discourse in Spanish-speakers texts: Theory and practice]. In M. C. Colombi & F. X. Alarcon (Eds.), La ensenanza del espanol a hispanohablantes Teaching Spanish to Spanish-speakers (pp. 175-189). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Connor, U. (1990). Linguistic/rhetorical measures for international student persuasive writing. Research in the Teaching of English 24, 67-87.
7. Crowhurst, M. (1990). The development of persuasive/argumentative writing. In R. Beach & S. Hynds (Eds.), Developing discourse practices in adolescence and adulthood (pp. 200-223). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Drury, H. (1991). The use of systemic linguistics to describe student summaries at university level. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses:Trends in linguistic studies and monographs, (pp. 431-456). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter Publishers.
10. Eggins, S., Wignell, R, & Martin, J. R. (1993). The discourse of history: Distancing the recoverable past. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory andpractice (pp. 75-109). London: Pinter Publishers.
11. Gibbons, J. (1999). Register aspects of literacy in Spanish. Written Language and Literacy, 2(1), 63-88.
12. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) Spoken and written language. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.
13. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993a). On the language of physical science. In M. A. K. Halliday &J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, (pp. 54-68) Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.
14. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993b). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. A. K. Halliday &J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, (pp. 69-85). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
15. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
16. Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). Literacy and linguistics: A functional perspective. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society, (pp. 339-376). Harlow, Essex, UK: Addison Wesley Longman.
17. Halliday, M. A-K. (1998). Things and relations. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourse of science, (pp. 185-235). London:Routledge.
18. Jones, J., Gollin, S., Drury, H., &Economou, D. (1989). Systemic-functional linguistics and its application to the TESOL Curriculum. In R. Hasan & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture, (pp. 257-328). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Martin, J. R. (1991). Nominalization in science and humanities: Distilling knowledge and scaffolding text. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 307-337). Trends in Linguistic Studies and Monographs. Berlin, Germany:Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Martin, J. R. (1993). Genre and literacy-Modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141-172.
21. Martin, J. R. (1996). Waves of abstraction: Organizing exposition. The Journal of TESOL-France, 3(1), 87-105.
22. Menyuk, R (1988). Language development: Knowledge and use. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
23. Schleppegrell, M. (1996). Conjunction in spoken English and ESL writing. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 271-285.
24. Schleppegrell, M., & Colombi, C. (1997). Text organization by bilingual writers. Written Communication, 14, 481-503.
25. Unsworth, L. (1999). Developing critical understanding of the specialised language of school of science and history texts: A functional grammatical perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42 7), 508-521.
26. Valdes, G., & Geoffrion-Vinci, M. (1998). Chicano Spanish: The problem of the “underdeveloped�? code in bilingual repertoires. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 473-501.
27. Veel, R. (1998). The greening of school science. InJ. R. Martin &R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science:Critical and functional perspectives on discourse of science (pp. 114-151). London:Routledge.
28. Ventola, E., & Mauranen, A. (1991). Non-native writing and native revising of scientific articles. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses:Trends in linguistic studies and monographs, (pp. 457-492). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
29. Ventola, E., & Mauranen, A. (Eds.). (1996). Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
30. Whittaker, R., & Rojo, L. M. (1999). A dialogue with bureaucracy: Register, genre and information management as constraints on interchangeability. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 149-189.