I Can Do it Better on the Computer: The Effects of Technology-Enabled Scaffolding on Young Writers' Composition

Journal of Special Education Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 5-21

  Englert, Carol Sue ^a   Manalo, Margaret ^a   Zhao, Yong ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071395849     PISSN: 01626434     EISSN: 23813121     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016264340401900101     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bereiter C., Scardamalia M., (1985). Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of “inert knowledge”. In Chipman S. F., Segal J. W., Glaser R., (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (vol. 2, pp. 65–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Brown J.S., Collins A., Duguid P., (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), pp. 32–42.
3. Callaghan M., Knapp P., Noble G., 1993). Genre in practice. In Cope B., Kalantzis M., (Eds.), The Powers of Literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 179–202). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
4. Cole M., Engestrom Y., (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In Salomon G., (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). NY: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cope B., Kalantzis M., (1993). The power of literacy and the literacy of power. In Cope B., Kalantzis M., (Eds.), The Powers of Literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 63–89). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
6. Englert C. S., Raphael T. E., Anderson L. M., Anthony H. M., Stevens D. D., Fear K. L., (1991). Making writing strategies and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction in writing in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337–372.
7. Englert C.S., Wu X., Zhao Y., (2004). Integrating cognitive tools for writing in a web-based environment: Mediating the performance of students with writing challenges. Unpublished paper. Michigan State University: East Lansing, Michigan.
8. Englert C. S., Zhao Y., (1996). TELE-Web: Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments on the Web. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
9. Freedman A., Medway P., (Eds.) (1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
10. Graham S., Harris K. R., (1989). Components analysis of cognitives strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (353–361).
11. Halliday M. A. K., Martin J. R., (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12. Hammill C., Larsen S., (1996). Test of Written Language, Third Edition (TOWL-3). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
13. Hofstetter F., (2001, February). The Future's Future. Presentation at Technology Conference, Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Washington, D.C.
14. Hutchins E., (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Kamberelis G., (1999). Genre development and learning: Children writing stories, science reports, and poems. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 403–460.
16. Olson D. R., (1995). Writing and the mind. In Wertsch J. V., Rio P. D., Alvarez A., (Ed.), Sociocultural Studies of the Mind (pp. 56–74). NY: Cambridge University Press.
17. Pea R.D., (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In Salomon G., (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). NY: Cambridge University Press.
18. Salomon G., (1993). No distribution without individuals' cognition: A dynamic interactional view In Salomon G., (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111–138). NY: Cambridge University Press.
19. Scribner S., (1997). The Cognitive Consequences of Literacy. In Tobach E., Falmagne R. J., Parlee M. B., Martin L. M. W., Kapelman A. S., (Ed.), Mind and social practice: Selected writings of Sylvia Scribner (pp. 160–189). NY: Cambridge University Press.
20. Stone C. A., (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31 (4), 344–364.
21. Stone C. A., (2002). Promises and pitfalls of scaffolded instruction for students with language learning disabilities. In Butler K. G., Silliman E. R., (Eds.), Speaking, reading and writing in children with language learning disabilities: New paradigms in research and practice (pp. 175–198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
22. Vygotsky L. S., (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. In Cole M., John-Steiner V., Scribner S., Souberman E., (Eds.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Wells G., (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. NY Cambridge University Press.
24. Wells G., (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In Smagorinsky C. D. L. P., (Ed.), Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51–85). NY: Cambridge University Press.
25. Wertsch J.V., (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Wertsch J.V., (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. NY: Cambridge University Press.
27. Wong B. Y. L., (1997). Research on genre-specific strategies for enhancing writing in adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(2), 140–159.
28. Wong B. Y. L., Jones W., (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–240.
29. Wong B. Y. L., Wilson M., (1984). Investigating awareness of and teaching passage organization in learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(8), 447–482.
30. Wood D. W., Bruner J. S., Ross G., (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.