Assistive and Instructional Technology for College Students with Disabilities: A National Snapshot of Postsecondary Service Providers

Journal of Special Education Technology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 5-14

  Michaels, Craig A ^a   Prezant, Fran Pollock ^c   Morabito, Stephen M ^c   Jackson, Kent ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071391046     PISSN: 01626434     EISSN: 23813121     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016264340201700101     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Anastasi A., (1988). Psychological testing (sixth edition). New York: Macmillian Publishing Company.
3. Blackhurst A. E., & MacArthur C., (1986). Microcomputer use in special education personnel preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 7(3), 27–36.
4. Cunningham C., & Coombs N., (1997). Higher education's obligation to people with disabilities. In Information access and adaptive technology, (pp. 1–11), Phoenix: American Council on Education Oryx Press.
5. Fichten C. S., Asuncion J., Barile M., Genereux C., Fossey M., Judd D., Robillard C., De Simone C., & Wells D., (2000). Technology integration for students with disabilities: Empirically based recommendations to faculty. Manuscript submitted for publication. Retrieved from http://evmett1.mcmaster.ca/network/workingpapers/Ere_Ficten/EreFicten.htm.
6. HEATH Resource Center. (1999). College freshman with disabilities: A biennial statistical profile. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
7. Higgins E. L., & Zvi J. C., (1995). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: From research to practice. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 123–142.
8. Inge K. J., & Shepherd J., (1995). Assistive technology applications and strategies for school system personnel. In Flippo K. F., Inge K. J., & Bacus J. M., (Eds.) Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 133–166). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
9. Lance G. D., (1996). Computer access in higher education: A national survey of service providers for students with disabilities, Journal of College Student Development, 37(3), 279–287.
10. Microsoft Corporation. (1997). Accessibility and disabilities: Accessible products. Retrieved from http://www.microsoft.com/enable/catalogue.htm.
11. Michaels C. A., (2000). Technical assistance to staff, students, and families. In Promising practices in technology: Supporting access to, and progress in, the general curriculum (pp. 38–45). Washington, DC: United States Office of Special Education Programs.
12. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). An institutional perspective on students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
13. National Council on Disability. (2000). Transition and post-school outcomes for youth with disabilities: Closing the gaps to post-secondary education and employment. Retrieved from http://www.ncd.gov/newsroorn/publications/transition_11-1-00.html.
14. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2000). Learning disabilities: Issues in higher education. Supplement to The ASHA Leader, 20, 32–36.
15. Nevo B., (1985). Face validity revisited. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 287–293.
16. Raskind M. H., & Higgins E. L., (1998). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 27–40.
17. Smith S., (2000). Teacher education—Associate editor's column. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 59–62.