Designing Differentiated Mathematics Games Discarding the One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Educational Game Play

Gifted Child Today

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 88-94

  Trinter, Christine P ^a   Brighton, Catherine M ^b   Moon, Tonya R ^b  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

creativity; curriculum; differentiation; math

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071303369     PISSN: 10762175     EISSN: 2162951X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1076217514568560     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Kaput, J. J., & Blanton, M. L. (2000). Algebraic reasoning in the context of elementary mathematics: Making it implementable on a massive scale. Dartmouth, MA: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
2. Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2007). Gameplaying for Maths learning: Cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 249-259.
3. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Authors.
4. Rogers, K., & Large, T. (2010). Usborne illustrated elementary math dictionary. London, England: Usborne.
5. Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013b). Differentiation and classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 415-430). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
6. Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013a). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
7. Tomlinson, C. (2004). Differentiation for gifted and talented students. New York, NY: Corwin Press.
8. Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 379-402.