An “asymmetrical” economic and monetary union in the EU: Perceptions of monetary authorities and social partners

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 59-81

  Verdun, Amy ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071209171     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07036339608429045     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Sandholtz, W., 1993. Choosing Union: Monetary Politics and Maastricht. International Organization, 47 (1): 1–39.
2. Lange, P., 1993. Maastricht and the Social Protocol: Why Did They Do It?. Politics and Society, 21 (1): 5–36.
3. EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES/EUROPEAN COUNCIL. 1992. Treaty on European Union, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
4. Moravcsik, A., 1991. Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community. International Organization, 45 (1): 19–56.
5. Cameron, D.R., 1995. “ Transnational Relations and the Development of European Economic and Monetary Union ”. In Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions Edited by: Risse-Kappen, T., 37–78. Cambridge
6. Wolf, D., and Zangl, B., 1996. The European Economic and Monetary Union: ‘Two-level Games” and the Formation of International Institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 2 (3): 355–393.
7. Haas, E.B., 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Economic and Social Forces 1950–57 Stanford
8. 1964. Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization Stanford
9. Mutimer, D., 1989. 1992 and the Political Integration of Europe: Neofunctionalism Reconsidered. Revue d'intégration européenne/Journal of European Integration, 13 (1): 75–101.
10. Tranholm-Mikkelsen, J., 1991. Neofunctionalism: Obstinate or Obsolete? A Reappraisal in the Light of the New Dynamism of the European Community. Millennium, 20 (1): 1–22.
11. Hoffmann, S., 1966. Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe. Daedalus, 95 (3): 862–916.
12. 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovemmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31 (4): A. Moravcsik473–524.
13. Sandholtz, W., 1996. Membership Matters: Limits of the Functional Approach to European Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34 (3): 403–429.
14. Rosamond, B., 1995. Mapping the European Condition: The Theory of Integration and the Integration of • Theory. European Journal of International Relations, 1 (3): 391–408.
15. Risse-Kappen, T., 1996. Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34 (1): 53–80.
16. Webb, C., 1983. “ Theoretical Perspectives and Problems ”. In Policymaking in the European Communities, 2nd ed. Edited by: Wallace, H., Wallace, W., and Webb, C., 1–42. New York
17. Martin, L., 1993. International and Domestic Institutions in the EMU Process. Economics and Politics, 5 (2): 125–144.
18. Huelshoff, M.G., 1994. Domestic Politics and Dynamic Issue Linkage. International Studies Quarterly, 38 (2): 255–279.
19. Putnam, R.D., 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42 (3): 427–460.
20. Evans, P.B., Jacobson, H.K., and Putnam, R.D., eds. 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy. International Bargaining and Domestic Politics Berkeley
21. Dyson, K., 1994. Elusive Union: The Process of Economic and Monetary Union London
22. Verdun, A., 1996. EMU and Domestic Politics: How “Core” Countries Cope with the Convergence Criteria. paper delivered at the 68th Canadian Political Science Association. June2–41996, St. Catherines.
23. Bulmer, S., 1994. The Governance of the European Union: A New Institutionalise Approach. Journal of Public Policy, 13 (4): 351–380.
24. Peterson, J., 1995. Decision Making in the European Union: Towards a Framework for Analysis. Journal of European Pubic Policy, 2 (1): 69–93.
25. Radaelli, C., 1995. The Role of Knowledge in the Policy Process,”. Journal of European Public Policy, 2 (2): 159–183.
26. Jacobsen, J.K., 1995. Much Ado About Ideas: The Cognitive Factor in Economic Policy. World Politics, 47: 283–310.
27. Mcnamara, K., Consensus and Constraint: the Politics of Monetary Cooperation in Europe Ithaca
28. Haas, P., 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Co-ordination. International Organization, 46 (1): 1–35.
29. Richardson, J., 1996. “ Policy Making in the EU: Interests, Ideas and Garbage Cans of Primeval Soup ”. In European Union: Power and Policy Making Edited by: Richardson, J., 3–23. London
30. Verdun, A., 1996. EMU—The Product of Policy Learning and Consensus Among Monetary Experts. Human Capital and Mobility Occasional Paper Series, 7
31. Rosenthal, G.G., 1975. Men Behind the Decisions Lexington, Mass.
32. Goodman, J.B., and Pauly, L.W., 1993. The Obsolescence of Capital Controls? Economic Management in an Age of Global Markets. World Politics, 46 October: 50–82.
33. Strange, S., 1996. The Retreat of the State, Diffusion of Power in the World Economy Cambridge
34. Andrews, D.M., 1994. Capital Mobility and State Autonomy: Toward a Structural Theory of International Monetary Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 38 (2): 193–218.
35. Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L., 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory Chicago
36. Corbin, J., and Strauss, A.L., 1990. Grounded Theory Research: Procedures. Canons and Evaluative Criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19 (6): 418–427.
37. Platt, J., 1992. “Case Study” in American Methodological Thought. Current Sociology, 40 (1): 17–48.
38. Andrews, D., 1993. “ The Global Origins of the Maastricht Treaty on EMU: Closing the Window of Opportunity ”. In State of the European Community: The Maastricht Debates and Beyond Edited by: Cafruny, A.W., and Rosenthal, G.G., 107–124. London
39. Dyson, K., and Featherstone, K., 1996. EMU and Economic Governance in Germany. German Politics, 5 (3)
40. Dyson, K., and Featherstone, K., 1996. Italy and EMU. Vincolo Esterna, Journal of South European Society and Politics, 2 (3)
41. Moravcsik, A., 1994. Why the European Community Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation, Working Paper Series, no. 52 Harvard University, Center for European Studies.
42. Dornbusch, R., 1991. “ Problems of European Monetary Integration ”. In European Financial Integration Edited by: Giovannini, A., and Mayer, C., 305–333. Cambridge
43. COMMITEE FOR THE STUDY OF ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION IN EUROPE (Delors Committee). 1989. Report on Economic and Monetary Union in the European Community, 24Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EC.
44. 1970. Report to the Council and the Commission on the Realization by Stages of Economic and Monetary Union in the Community. Bulletin of the EC, November: 12
45. 1988. Bulletin of the EC.
46. Kruse, D.C., 1980. Monetary Integration in Western Europe: EMU, EMS and Beyond London
47. Burda, M., and Wyplotz, C., 1993. Macroeconomics: A European Text Oxford
48. EL-Agraa, A.M., ed. 1990. The Economics of the European Community London
49. Hasse, R.H., 1990. The European Central Bank: Perspectives for a Further Development of the European Monetary System Gühtersloh
50. Tsoukalis, L., 1977. The Politics and Economics of European Monetary Integration London
51. Verdun, A.C., 1994. Economic and Monetary Union in Europe: Still Desirable. paper presented at the Annual Canadian Political Science Association Conference. June12–141994, Calgary.
52. Eichengreen, B., 1990. One Money for Europe? Lessons from the US Currency and Customs Union. Economic Policy, 10: 117–187.
53. Eichengreen, B., and Frieden, J.A., 1993. The Political Economy of European Monetary Unification: An Analytical Introduction. Economics and Politics, 5 (2): 85–105.
54. Masera, R.S., 1994. European Monetary Unification. The World Economy, 17 (3): 249–281.
55. Sachs, J.D., and Sala-I-Martin, X.C., 1992. “ Fiscal Federalism and Optimum Currency Areas: Evidence for Europe from the United States ”. In Establishing a Central Bank: Issues in Europe and Lessons from the US Edited by: Canzoneri, M., Grill, V., and Masson, P.R., 195–220. Cambridge
56. Balleix, C., 1993. Discours politique et intégration européenne: les gaullistes face au projet de banque centrale européenne. Revue d'intégration européenne/Journal of European Integration, 17 (1): 7–52.
57. Italianer, A., 1993. “ Mastering Maastricht: EMU Issues and How They Were Settled ”. In Economic and Monetary Union: Implications for National Policy Makers, Edited by: Gretschmann, K., 51–115. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
58. Verdun, A.C., 1990. Naar een Economische en Monétaire Unie (1970–1990): Een Analyse van de Politieke Beleidsruimte in Nederland (Towards EMU: An Analysis of the Political Room for Manoeuvre in the Netherlands), International Relations, University of Amsterdam. Doctoraal-Scriptie (Master's Thesis).
59. Louis, J.-V., ed. 1989. Vers un Système Européen de Banques Centrales: Projet de Dispostions Organiques, Bruxelles: Institute d'Etudes européennes.
60. HOUSE OF LORDS. 1989. The Delors Committee Report. Select Committee on the European Communities of the House of Lords, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
61. Verdun, A., European Responses to Globalization and Financial Market Integration: Perceptions of EMU in Britain. France and Germany London and New York
62. Verdun, A., 1996. Op Weg naar een Economische en Monétaire Unie in Europa: Waarom Eigenlijk? Percepties over de EMU in het Verenigd Koninkrijk, Frankrijk en Duitsland (Why Head Towards Economic and Monetary Union? Perceptions of EMU in the United Kingdom, France and Germany). Acta Politica, 31 (3) July
63. COMMISSION OF THE EC. 1977. Report of the Study Group on the Role of Public Finance in European Integration, MacDougall Report vols. 1 and 2, Brussels
64. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 1993. Stable-Sound Finances; Community Public Finance in the Perspective of EMU. European Economy.
65. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 1993. The Economics of Community Public Finance. European Economy.
66. Goodhart, C., 1990. “ Fiscal Policy and EMU ”. In Britain and EMU, Edited by: Pöhl, K.-O., London: Centre for Economic Performance and the Financial Markets Group.
67. Eichengreen, B., 1995. “ Fiscal Policy and EMU ”. In The Political Economy of European Monetary Unification Edited by: Eichengreen, B., and Frieden, J., 167–190. Boulder, San Francisco and Oxford