The impact of changing roles on relationships between professionals in inclusive programs for young children

Early Education and Development

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 67-82

  Liebef, Joan ^a   Beckman, Paula J ^a   Hanson, Marci J ^b   Janko, Susan ^c   Marquart, Jules M ^d   Horn, Eva ^d   Odom, Samuel L ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071205367     PISSN: 10409289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15566935eed0801_6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baker, J. M. & Zigmond, N. (1995). The meaning and practice of inclusion for students with learning disabilities: Themes and implications from the five cases. The Journal of Special Education, 29(2), 163-180.
2. Bricker, D. (1995). The challenge of inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention, 19(3), 179-194.
3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
4. Charmaz, C. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 109-126). Boston: Little, Brown.
5. Ferguson, D. (1995, December). The real challenge of inclusion: Confessions of a ‘rabid inclusionist’. Phi Delta Kappan, 281-287.
6. Ferguson, D., Meyer, G., Jeanchild, L., Juniper, L. & Zingo, J. (1992). Figuring out what to do with the grown-ups: How teachers make inclusion “work” for students with disabilities. Journal for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17(4), 218-226.
7. File, N. & Kontos, S. (1992). Indirect service delivery through consultation: Review and implications for early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 16(3), 221-233.
8. Firestone, W. A. & Herriot, R. E. (1984). Multisite qualitative policy research: Some design and implementation issues. In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.) Ethnography in educational evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Friend, M. & Cook, L. (1996). Interactions: Collaboration skills for professionals. White Plains, New York: Longman Publishers.
10. Giangreco, M. F., Dennis, Cloninger, C., Edelman, S. & Schattman, R. (1993). “I’ve counted Jon”: Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59(4), 359-372.
11. Guralnick, M. (1982). Mainstreaming young handicapped children: A public policy and ecological systems analysis. In Spodek (Ed.), Handbook of research in early childhood education (pp. 456-500).
12. Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
13. Lamorey, S. & Bricker, D. D. (1993). Integrated programs: Effects on young children and their parents. In C. A. Peck, S. L. Odom, & D. D. Bricker (Eds.), Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs: Ecological perspectives on research and implementation (pp. 249-270). Baltimore: Brookes.
14. Marchant, C. (1995). Teachers’ views of integrated preschools. Journal of Early Intervention, 19(1), 61-73.
15. Odom, S. L., Peck, C. A., Hanson, M., Beckman, P.J., Kaiser, A. P., Lieber, J., Brown, W. H., Horn, E. M., & Schwartz, I. S. (in press). Inclusion at the preschool level: An ecological systems analysis. Social Policy Report - Society for Research in Child Development.
16. Peck, C. (1993). Ecological perspectives on implementation of integrated early childhood programs. In C. Peck, S. Odom, & D. Bricker (Eds) Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs: Ecological perspectives on research and implementation (pp. 3-16) Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
17. Peck, C., Furman, G. & Helmstetter, E. (1993). Integrated early childhood programs: Research on the implementation of change in organizational contexts. In C. Peck, S. Odom, & D. Bricker (Eds.), Integrating young children with disabilities into community programs: Ecological perspectives on research and implementation (pp. 187-206). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
18. Pugach, M. (1995). On the failure of imagination in inclusive schooling. Journal of Special Education, 29 (2), 212-223.
19. Rose, D. & Smith, B. J. (1994). Providing public education services to preschoolers with disabilities in community-based programs: Who’s responsible for what? Young Children, 49(6), 64-68.
20. Sindelar, P. T. (1995). Full inclusion of students with learning disabilities and its implications for teacher education. Journal of Special Education, 29 (2), 234-244.
21. Thousand, J. S. & Villa, R. A. (1992). Collaborative teams: A powerful too in school restructuring. In R. A. Villa, J. S. Thousand, W. Stainback & S. Stainback. Restructuring for caring and effective education (pp. 73-108). Baltimore: Brookes.
22. Thousand, J. & Villa, R. A. (1995, December). Inclusion: Alive and well in the green mountain state. Phi Delta Kappan, 288-291.
23. Wolcott, H. (1990). Writing up qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Zelditch, M. (1962). Some methodological problems of field studies. American Journal of Sociology, 67, 566-576.
25. Zigmond, N. (1995). An exploration of the meaning and practice of special education in the context of full inclusion of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 29 (2), 109-115.