Are the U.S. current account deficits really sustainable?

International Economic Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 51-58

  Stilianos, Fountas ^a   Jyh Lin, Wu ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071201163     PISSN: 10168737     EISSN: 1743517X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10168739900000004     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Engel, Robert, and Granger, Cliver. 1987. Cointegration and Error-Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, March: 251–276.
2. Fountas, Stilianos, and Wu, Jyh-lin. March 1998. “ Are the U.S. Current Account Deficits Really Sustainable ”. Working Paper No. 20 March, Galway
3. Gregory, Alan, and Hansen, Bruce. 1996. Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with Regime Shifts. Journal of Econometrics, January: 99–126.
4. Hakkio, Craig. Third Quarter 1995. “ The U.S. Current Account: The Other Deficit ”. In Economic Review Third Quarter, 11–24.
5. Hakkio, Craig, and Rush, Mark. 1991. Is the budget deficit "too large. Economic Inquiry, July: 429–445.
6. Husted, Steven. 1992. The emerging U.S. Current Account Deficit in the 1980s: A Cointegration Analysis. The Review of Economics & Statistics, February: 159–166.
7. Perron, Pierre. 1989. The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis. Econometrica, November: 1361–1401.
8. Phillips, Peter C. B., 1987. Time series regression with a unit root. Econometrica, March: 277–301.
9. Phillips, Peter C. B., and Perron, Pierre. 1988. Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, June: 335–346.
10. Zivot, Eric, and Andrews, Donal. 1992. Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, July: 251–270.