Measurement obstacles to international comparisons and the need for regional design and analysis in mathematics surveys

International Comparisons in Mathematics Education

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 225-240

  Wolfe, Richard G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071129927     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203012086-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (5)

1. CRONBACH, L.J., GLESER, G.C., NANDA, H. And RAJARATNAM, N. (1972) TheDependability of Behavioral Measurements, New York: Wiley.
2. HUSEN, T. (1967) International Study of Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparison of Twelve Countries, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
3. LAPOINTE, A., MEAD, N. And PHILLIPS, G. (1989) A World of Differences: An International Assessment of Mathematics and Science, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4. WALKER, D.A. (1962) ‘An analysis of the reactions of Scottish teachers and pupils to items in the geography, mathematics and science items’, in Educational Achievements of Thirteen-year-olds in Twelve Countries, Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.
5. WOMER, F.B. (1970) What is National Assessment? Ann Arbor, MI: National Assessment of Educational Progress.