AMWA–EMWA–ISMPP joint position statement on predatory publishing

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2019, Pages 1657-1658

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHOR; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EID: 85071054004     PISSN: 03007995     EISSN: 14734877     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1646535     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Laine C, Winker MA. Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals [Internet]. World Association of Medical Editors [updated 2019 Jun 18; cited 2017 Feb 18]. Available from: http://www.wame.org/identifying-predatory-or-pseudo-journals
2. Cabell’s Blacklist Violations [Internet] [updated 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: http://www2.cabells.com/blacklist-criteria
3. Cobey KD, Lalu MM, Skidmore B, et al. What is a predatory journal? A scoping review. Version 2. F1000Res. 2018;7:1001.
4. Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature. 2012;489:179.
5. Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers [Internet] [updated 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: http://openscience.ens.fr/ABOUT_OPEN_ACCESS/BLOGS/2017_01_23_Jeffrey_Beall_last_list_of_predatory_journals.pdf
6. Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association–Code of Conduct [Internet] [updated 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: https://oaspa.org/membership/code-of-conduct
7. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. “Fake,” “Predatory,” and “Pseudo” Journals: Charlatans Threatening Trust in Science [Internet] [updated 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/news-and-editorials/fake_predatory_pseudo_journals_dec17.html
8. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Responsibilities in the Submission and Peer-Review Process [Internet] [updated 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/responsibilities-in-the-submission-and-peer-peview-process.html
9. Council of Science Editors. Predatory or Deceptive Publishers–Recommendations for Caution [Internet] [updated 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/cse-policies/approved-by-the-cse-board-of-directors/predatory-deceptive-publishers-recommendations-caution
10. Berger M. Everything you ever wanted to know about predatory publishing but were afraid to ask [Internet] [updated 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2017/EverythingYouEverWantedtoKnowAboutPredatoryPublishing.pdf
11. Mizera K. What is Gold Open Access–useful links [Internet] [updated 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: https://openscience.com/what-is-gold-open-access/
12. Shen C, Bjork BC. ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med. 2015;13:230.
13. PubMed [Internet] [updated 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
14. Directory of Open Access Journals [Internet] [updated 2019 Jun 18]. Available from: https://doaj.org/
15. Moher D, Shamseer L, Cobey KD, et al. Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature. 2017;549:23–25.
16. Sharma H, Verma S. Predatory journals: the rise of worthless biomedical science. J Postgrad Med. 2018;64:226–231.