Neopatrimonialism and the prospects for democratization in the central asian republics

Power and Change in Central Asia

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 42-58

  Ishiyama, John ^a  

^a TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071020629     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203166918-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. S. Mainwaring, ‘Presidentialism, Multipartism and Democracy: The Difficult Combination’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 26, 1993, p. 198
2. J.J. Linz, ‘The Perils of Presidentialism’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 1, 1990, pp. 51-69
3. J.J. Linz, ‘Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does it Make a Difference?', in J.J. Linz and A. Valenzuala (eds), The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994, pp. 3-87
4. A. Stepan and C. Skach, ‘Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation’, World Politics, vol. 46, 1993, pp. 1-22.
5. D. Horowitz, ‘Comparing Democratic Systems’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 1, 1990, p. 789
6. M.S. Shugart and J.M. Carey, Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
7. J. Elster ‘Afterword: The Making of Postcommunist Presidencies’, in R. Taras (ed.), Postcommunist Presidents, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 225-37.
8. J. McGregor, ‘The Presidency In East Central Europe’, RFE/RL Research Report, vol. 3, no. 2, 1994, pp. 23-31
9. J. Hellman, ‘Constitutions and Economic Reform in the Postcommunist Transitions’, East European Constitutional Review vol. 5, 1996, pp. 46-56
10. J. Ishiyama and M. Velten, ‘Presidential Power and Democratic Development in Post-Communist Politics’, Communist and Postcommunist Studies, vol. 31, 1998, pp. 217-34.
11. Hellman, ‘Constitutions and Economic Reform’; and T. Frye, ‘A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 30, 1997, pp. 523-52.
12. M. Bratton and N. Van de Walle, ‘Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa’, World Politics, vol. 46, no. 3, 1994, pp. 453-89.
13. S. Huntington, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Twentieth Century, Norman, University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
14. H. Kitschelt, ‘Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-communist Democracies:Theoretical Propositions’, Party Politics, vol. 1, no. 4, 1995, pp. 447-72
15. A. Agh, ‘Partial Consolidation of the East-Central European Parties: The Case of the Hungarian Socialist Party’, Party Politics, vol. 1, no. 4, 1995, pp. 491-514
16. J. Ishiyama ‘The Sickle or the Rose?: Previous Regime Types and the Evolution of the Ex-Communist Parties in Post-communist Societies’, Comparative Political Studies vol. 30, no. 3, 1997, pp. 299-330.
17. M.B. Olcott, ‘Kazakhstan: Nursultan Nazerbaev as Strong President’, in R. Taras (ed.), Postcommunist Presidents, pp. 106-29.
18. R. Snyder, ‘Explaining Transitions for Neopatrimonial Dictatorships’, Comparative Politics vol. 24, no. 4, 1994, p. 379.
19. S.N. Eisenstadt, Revolution and the Transformation of Societies: A Comparative Study of Civilizations, New York, The Free Press, 1978.
20. G. Roth, ‘Personal Rulership, Patrimonialism and Empire-Building in the New States’, World Politics, vol. 20, no. 2, 1968, pp. 194-206
21. J.J. Linz, ‘Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes’, in F. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby (eds), Handbook of Political Science, Volume 3: Macropolitical Theory, Reading, Addison-Wesley, 1975, pp. 259-60.
22. M. Weber, Economy and Society, New York, Bedminister Press, 1968.
23. R. Theobold ‘Patrimonialism’, World Politics, vol. 34, no. 3, 1982.
24. Bratton and Van de Walle, ‘Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa’, p. 458.
25. R.H. Jackson and C.G. Rosberg, Personal Rule in Black Africa, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1982, p. 5.
26. H. Mahdavy, ‘The Patterns and Problems of Economic Development in Rentier States: The Case of Iran’, in M.A. Cook (ed.), Studies in Economic History of the Middle East, London, Oxford University Press, 1970, p. 225.
27. H. Shambayati, ‘The Rentier State, Interest Groups and the Paradox of Autonomy:State and Business in Turkey and Iran’, Comparative Politics, vol. 25, no. 3, 1994, p. 309
28. H. Beblawi, ‘The Rentier State in the Arab World’, in H. Beblawi and G. Luciani (eds), The Rentier State, London, Croom Helm, 1987, p. 51.
29. L. Anderson, ‘Obligation and Accountability: Islamic Politics in North Africa’, Daedalus, vol. 120, no. 1, 1991, p. 102.
30. R. Dahl, Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1971.
31. Linz, ‘The Perils of Presidentialism’, p. 60.
32. Stepan and Skach, ‘Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation’, p. 17.
33. Bratton and Van de Walle, ‘Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa’, p. 477.
34. G. Gleason The Central Asian States, Boulder, Westview Press, 1997, p. 110
35. Olcott, ‘Kazakhstan: Nursultan Nazerbaev as Strong President’; A. Stanley, ‘Ex-Communist Rules Turkestan Like a Sultan’, The New York Times 23 November 1995, p. A3
36. A. Leder, ‘The Cult of Personality and Pipe Dreams’, The New York Times, 4 January 1998, section 4, p. 4
37. R. Kangas, ‘Problems of State Building in the Central Asian Republics’, World Affairs, vol. 157, no. 1, 1994, pp. 29-37
38. P. Collignon, ‘The Turkmenbashi Cult’, World Press Review, October 1996, pp. 27-9.
39. M.B. Olcott, ‘Kazakstan’, in G.E. Curtis (ed.), Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, Washington, Federal Research Division, Library of Congress, 1997, p. 163.
40. Olcott, ‘Kazakhstan’, p. 65.
41. N. Lubin, ‘Uzbekistan’, in Curtis (ed.), p. 425.
42. L. Clark, M. Thurman and D. Tyson, ‘Turkmenistan’, in Curtis (ed.), p. 334.
43. Gleason, Central Asian States, p. 111.
44. A. Feur, ‘The Cult of Personality and Pipe Dreams’, The New York Times, 4 January 1998, section 4, p. 3
45. ‘Oil of Freedom’, The Economist, 11 April 1998, p. 32
46. D. Nissman, ‘Turkmenistan (Un)transformed’, Current History, vol. 93, no. 582, 1994, pp. 183-6.
47. C. Panico, ‘Turkmenistan Unaffected by Winds of Democratic Change’, RFE/RL Research Report, vol. 2, no. 4, 1993, pp. 6-10.
48. Gleason, Central Asian States, p. 114.
49. R. Kangas, ‘Uzbekistan: Evolving Authoritarianism’, Current History, vol. 93, no. 582, 1994, pp. 178-82.
50. M. Spector, ‘Soviet-Style Rule in Uzbekistan Provides a Bearable Life “If We are Quiet�? ', The New York Times, 16 April 1995, p. 6.
51. Kangas, ‘Uzbekistan: Evolving Authoritarianism’, pp. 178-9.
52. ‘A United Front in Kazakhstan’, The Economist, 17 January 1998, p. 37.
53. ‘The Man Who Knows Best’, The Economist, 24 October 1998, p. 40.
54. ‘Bad News in Kyrgyzstan’, The Economist, 21 June 1997, p. 46.
55. ‘Hold Your Breath’, The Economist, 15 March 1997, pp. 39-40.
56. M. Atkin, ‘Tajikistan: Reform, Reaction, and Civil War’, in I. Bremmer and R. Taras (eds), New States, New Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 614.
57. M. Atkin, ‘Thwarted Democratization in Tajikistan’, in K. Dawisha and B. Parrott (eds), Conflict, Cleavage, and Change in Central Asia and the Caucasus, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 301.
58. S. Le Vine, ‘Economists Foresee a Stumble in Uzbekistan’s Stride’, The New York Times, 2 January 1999, p. A6.