To marry again or not a dynamic modelfor demographic transition

Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 345-368

  Luttbeg, Barney ^a   Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff ^b   Mangel, Marc ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070685778     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Anderies, J. M. 1996. An adaptive model for predicting !Kung reproductive performance: A stochastic dynamic programming approach. Ethology and Sociobiology 17:221-246
2. Beauchamp, G. 1994. The functional analysis of human fertility decisions. Ethology and Sociobiology 15:31-53
3. Becker, G. S., and H. G. Lewis. 1973. Interaction between quantity and quality of children. In Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital. T. W. Shultz, ed. Pp. 81-90. Chicago: Chicago University Press
4. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. 1987a. On cultural and reproductive success: Kipsigis evidence. American Anthropologist 89:617-634
5. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. 1987b. Resources and reproductive success in women, with an example from the Kipsigis. Journal of Zoology 213:489-505
6. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. 1990. Kipsigis women's preferences for wealthy men: Evidence for female choice in mammals. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27:255-264
7. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. 1995. Bridewealth and its correlates: Quantifying changes over time. Current Anthropology 36:573-603
8. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. 1998a. Brothers and Sisters: Biased investment among the Kipsigis of Kenya. Human Nature 9:119-162
9. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. 1998b. The demographic transition: Are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13(7):266-270
10. Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Kerr, A. and M. D. Moore. 1997. Time allocation among the Kipsigis of Kenya. Volume XIV Cross Cultural Studies in Time Allocation. Connecticut: Human Relations Area Files, Inc
11. Bongaarts, J. and S.C. Watkins. 1996. Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review 22(4):639-682
12. Boyd, R, and P. J. Richerson. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
13. Coale, A. J., and S. C. Watkins, eds. 1986. The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press
14. Goody, J. 1976. Production and Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
15. Irons, W. 1979. Culture and biological success. In Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, N. A. Chagnon and W. Irons, eds. Pp. 257-272. North Scituate, Massachussetts: Duxbury
16. Jones, Gavin W., R. M. Douglas, J. C. Caldwell, and R. M. D'Souza. 1997. The continuing demographic transition. New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press
17. Kaplan, H. S., J. B. Lancaster, J. A. Bock, and S. E. Johnson. 1995. Fertility and fitness among Albuquerque men: A competitive labour market theory. In Human Reproductive Decisions, R.I. M. Dunbar, pp. 96-136. London: StMartin's Press
18. Lack, D. 1947. The significance of clutch size. Ibis 89:302-352
19. Lesthaeghe, R., and C. Wilson. 1986. Modes of production, secularization, and the pace of fertility decline in Western Europe, 1870-1930. In The Decline of Fertility in Europe, A. J. Coale and S. C. Watkins, eds. Pp. 261-292. Princeton: Princeton University Press
20. Livi-Bacci, M. 1986. Social-group forerunners of fertility control in Europe. In The Decline of Fertility in Europe, A. J. Coale and S. C. Watkins, eds. Pp. 182-200. Princeton: Princeton University Press
21. Low, B. S. 1994. Men in demographic transition. Human Nature 5:223-254
22. Mangel, M., and C. W. Clark. 1988. Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology. Princeton: Princeton University Press
23. Mangel, M., and D. Ludwig. 1992. Definition and evaluation of the fitness of behavioral and developmental programs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:507-536
24. Mueller, E and K. Short. 1983. Effects of income and wealth on the demand for children. In Supply and Demand for Children, R. A Bulatao and R. D. Lee, eds. Pp. 590-642. Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press
25. Mueller, U. n.d. What is Evolutionary Competition About? Average, Maximal, and Optimal Fecundity. Mannheim, Germany: Centre for Survey Research and Methodology
26. Notestein, F, W. 1953. Economic problems of population change. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economists, pp. 13-31. London: Oxford University Press
27. Peristiany, J. G. 1939. The Social Institutions of the Kipsigis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
28. Perusse, D. 1993. Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:267-322
29. Robinson, W. C. 1992. Kenya enters the fertility transition. Population Studies 46:445-457
30. Rogers, A. R. 1990. The evolutionary economics of human reproduction. Ethology and Sociobiology 11:4 79-495
31. Rogers, A. R. 1995. For love or money: The evolution of reproductive and material motivations. In Human Reproductive Decisions, R.I. M. Dunbar, ed. Pp. 76-95. London: St Martin's Press
32. Skinner, G. W. 1997. Family Systems and Demographic Processes. In Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis, D. I. Kertzer and T. E. Fricke, eds. Pp. 53-9:5. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
33. Stenning, D. J. 1959. Savannah Nomads. Oxford: Oxford University Press
34. Symons, D. 1987. If we are all Darwinians, what's the fuss about? In Sociobiology and Psychology, B. Crawford, M. F. Smith, and D. L. Krebs, eds. Pp. 121-146. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
35. Turke, P. 1989. Evolution and the demand for children. Population and Development Review 15:61-90
36. Vining, D. R. 1986. Social versus reproductive success-the central theoretical problem of human sociobiology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9:167-260
37. Wilson, C., and P. Airey. 1999. How can a homeostatic perspective enhance demographic transition theory? Population Studies 53(2):117-128