Conjecturing and argumentation in high-school geometry students

Designing Learning Environments for Developing Understanding of Geometry and Space

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 319-348

  Koedinger, Kenneth R ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070621105     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203053461-19     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167-207.
2. Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Kline, P. J., & Neves, D. M. (1981). Acquisition of problem-solving skill. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition, (pp. 191-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Cavalli-Sforza, V., Lesgold, A., & Wiener, A. (1992). Strategies for contributing to collaborative arguments. In Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 755-760). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students’ justifications for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359-387.
5. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Gelernter, H. (1963). Realization of a geometry theorem proving machine. In E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 134-152). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Healy, C. (1993). Creating miracles: A story of student discovery. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
9. Jackiw, N. (1991). The Geometer’s Sketchpad [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
10. Klahr, D., & Carver, S. M. (1988). Cognitive objectives in a LOGO debugging curriculum: Instruction, learning, and transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 362-404.
11. Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1-48.
12. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14, 511-550.
13. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1991). Interaction of deductive and inductive reasoning strategies in geometry novices. In Proceedings of the thirteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1993a). Reifying implicit planning in geometry: Guidelines for model-based intelligent tutoring system design. In S. Derry & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 15-45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1993b). Effective use of intelligent software in high school math classrooms. In Proceedings of the world conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 241-248). Charlottesville, VA: American Association for Computers in Education.
16. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (in press). Illustrating principled design: The early evolution of a cognitive tutor for algebra symbolization. Interactive Learning Environment.
17. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Lehrer, R., Randle, L., & Sancilio, L. (1989). Learning pre-proof geometry with Logo. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 159-184.
20. Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior: A variational approach to the effects of Einstellung. Eugene: University of Oregon Books.
21. Nathan, M. J., Koedinger, K. R., & Tabachneck, H. J. M. (1996, April). Difficulty factors in arithmetic and algebra: The disparity of teachers’ beliefs and students’ performances. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Pelavin, S. (1990). Changing the odds: Factors increasing access to college (Report No. 003969). New York: College Board Publications.
25. Ritter, S., & Koedinger, K. R. (1995). Toward lightweight tutoring agents. In Proceedings of the 7th world conference on artificial intelligence in education (pp. 91-98). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
26. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
27. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 338-355.
28. Senk, S. L. (1983). Proof-writing achievement and van Hiele levels among secondary school geometry students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
29. Serra, M. (1989). Discovering geometry: An inductive approach. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
30. Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). Transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Tabachneck, H. J. M., Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (1994). Toward a theoretical account of strategy use and sense-making in mathematics problem solving. In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 836-841). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.