Artificial intelligence in music education: A critical review

Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 239-274

  Holland, Simon ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070618919     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203059746-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (92)

1. Ames, C., The Markov Process as a Compositional Model: A Survey and Tutorial. Leonardo, 22(2), 175-187, (1989).
2. Baker, M., An artificialintelligence approach to musical grouping analysis. Contemporary Music Review, 2, 43-68, (1989).
3. Baker, M., Arguing withthe Tutor. In M. Elsom-Cook (Eds.), Guided Discovery Tutoring London: Paul Chapman Publishing. (1990).
4. Baker, M., A Model for Negotiation in Learning Teaching Dialogues. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(2), (1994).
5. Balzano, G. J., The Group-theoretic Description of 12-fold and Microtonal Pitch systems. Computer Music Journal, 4(4), (1980).
6. Bamberger, J., Music Logo. Cambridge, MA: Terrapin Inc. (1986).
7. Bamberger, J., The Mind Behind the Musical Ear. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press. (1991).
8. Binary Designs. Band In A Box. (1996).
9. Camurri, A., Canepa, C, Frixione, M. and Zaccaria, R., HARP: A System for Intelligent Composer’s Assistance. IEEE Computer, 24(7), 64-67, (1991).
10. Carbonell, J.R., AI in CAI: an artificial intelligence approach to computer-aided instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems(MMS), 11(4), 190-202, (1970).
11. Carr, W., Quality in Teaching. Brighton: Falmer Press. (1989).
12. Clynes, M., Expressive Microstructure in Music, liked to Living Qualities. In Sundberg J., (Ed.), Studies of Music Performance Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music. (1983).
13. Cook, J., Agent Reflection in an Intelligent Learning Environment Architecture for Composition. In Smith, M., Smaill, A., and Wiggins, G. A., (Eds.), Music Education: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, London: Springer Verlag. (1994).
14. Cook, J., and Morgan, N., COLERIDGE: Composition Learning Environment for Reflection about Intentions and Dialogue Goals in Education. In Smaill A., (Ed.), International Congress in Music and Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, Department of Music. (1995).
15. Cork, C, Harmony, by LEGO bricks. (1988).
16. Cumming, N., Eugene Narmour’s Theory of Melody. Music Analysis, 11(203), 354-374, (1992).
17. Desain, P., and Honing, H., LOCO, composition microworlds in Logo. In P.Berg (Ed.), International Computer Music Conference, (pp. 109-118). San Francisco: Computer Music Association. (1986).
18. Desain, P., and Honing, H., Music, Mind and Machine. Studies in Computer Music, Music Cognition and Artificial Intelligence. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers. (1992).
19. Desain, P., and Honing, H., LOCO-SONNET: a graphical dataflow language for algorithmic composition. Manuscript available at http://www.nici.kun.nl/mmm/papers/dh-96-g.html (1996).
20. Dewey, J., Democracy and Education. The Macmillan Company. (1916).
21. Elsom-Cook, M., (Ed.). Guided Discovery Tutoring. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. (1990).
22. Fenton, A., The Design of an Intelligent Tutoring System for Music. Musicus, 1(2), 125-143, (1989).
23. Feynman, R.P., Surely you’re joking Mr Feynman. London: Unwin. (1986).
24. Fux, J. J., Gradus ad Parnassum. New York, Norton. (1725/1965).
25. Gross, D., Computer applicationsto Music theory: a retrospective. Computer Music Journal, 8(4), (1984).
26. Hofstetter, F., Computer-Based Aural Training: the Guido System. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 7(3), 84-92, (1981).
27. Holland, S., A knowledge-based tutor for music composition. (Open University IET CITE Report No. 16, June 1987. No. 16), (1987).
28. Holland, S., Artificial Intelligence, Education and Music. Ph.D. Thesis, Open University. (1989).
29. Holland, S., Interface designfor empowerment: a case study from music. Multimedia Interface Design in Education. Edwards, A.D.N., and Holland, S., Berlin, Springer Verlag. (1992).
30. Holland, S., Preliminary report on the design of a constraint-based musical planner (Technical Report No. AUCS/TR9113). Department of Computing Science, Kings College, University of Aberdeen. (1991).
31. Holland, S., Learning aboutharmony with Harmony Space: an overview. In Smith, M., Smaill, A, and Wiggins, G. (Eds.), Music Education: an artificial Intelligence approach. London: Springer Verlag. (1994).
32. Holland, S., and Elsom-Cook, M., Architecture ofa knowledge-based music tutor. In M. Elsom-Cook (Eds.), Guided Discovery Tutoring. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. (1990).
33. Honing, H., POCO: an environment for analysing, modifying, and generating expression in music. In Proceedings of the 1990 International Computer Music Conference, (pp. 364-368). San Francisco: Computer Music Association. (1990).
34. Honing, H., Expresso, a strong and small editor for expression. In Proceedings of the 1992 International Computer Music Conference, (pp. 215-218). San Francisco: Computer Music Association. (1992).
35. Howard, P., Holland, S., and Whitelock, D., Keyboard Harmony: some applications of computers in music education. Musical Times, 467-471, (1994).
36. Hutchins, E.L., Hollans, J.D., and Norman, D.A., Direct Manipulation Interfaces. In Norman, D.A., and Draper, S., (Eds.), User Centred System Design: New perspectives on Human Computer Interaction, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (1986).
37. Jameson, J., Sonnet: Audio-Enhanced Monitoring and Debugging. In The International Conference on Auditory Display '92. (1992).
38. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Jazz Improvisation: A Theory at the Computational Level. In Howell, P. N., West, R., and Cross, I., (Eds.), Representing Musical Structure London: Academic Press. (1991).
39. Johnson-Laird, P. N., The Computer and the Mind. London: Fontana. (1988a).
40. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Freedom andConstraint in Creativity. In Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity (pp. 202-219). Cambridge University Press. (1988b).
41. Kane, T., Another Prototype implementation of the Rhythm Machine. Masters Thesis, University of Aberdeen, Department of Computing Science. (1991).
42. Kommers, P., Jonassen, D., and Mayes, T., Cognitive Tools for Learning. Berlin: Springer. (1992).
43. Laurillard, D., Rethinking university teaching: a framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge. (1993).
44. Lenat, D.B., and Brown, J.S., Why AM and Eurisko appear to work. Artificial Intelligence, 21, 31-59, (1984).
45. Lerdahl, E, and Jackendoff, R., A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. London: MIT Press. (1983).
46. Levitt, D. A., Hookup. In Proceedings of the Conference on Small Computers and the Arts, Philadelphia. (1986).
47. Levitt, D. A., A Melody Description System for Jazz Improvisation. MSc Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (1981).
48. Levitt, D. A., A Representation for Musical Dialects. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (1985).
49. Lipman, M., Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1991a).
50. Lipman, M., Strengthening reasoningand judgement through philosophy. In Maclure, S., and Davies, P., (Ed.), Learning to think: thinking to learn. Proceedings of the 1989 OED conference, Persimmon Press. (1991b).
51. Longuet-Higgins, H.C., Letter toa Musical Friend. Music Review (August 1962), 244-248, (1962).
52. McAdams, S., and Bregman, A., Hearing Musical Streams. The Foundations of Computer Music. Roads, C, and Strawn, J., (Editors), Boston, MIT Press. (1985).
53. Mehegan, J., Jazz Improvisation I: Tonal and Rhythmic Principles. New York: Watson-Guptil Publications. (1959).
54. Menzel, E.W., Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Problem seeking versus the bird-inhand, least-effort strategy. Primates, 32, 497-508, (1991).
55. Minsky, M., Music Mind and Meaning. Computer Music Journal, 5(3), 28-44, (1981).
56. Moore, A., Patterns ofharmony. Popular Music, 11(1), 73-106, (1992).
57. Morgan, N., and Tolonen, P., Symbolic Composer Professional -a software application for Apple Macintosh computers. (1995).
58. Narmour, E., The “genetic code�? of melody: Cognitive structures generated by the implication-realisation model. Contemporary Music Review, 4, 45-63, (1989).
59. Naughton, J., Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Training. Open University Systems Group/Manpower Services Commission. (1986).
60. Newcomb, S.R., LASSO: An intelligent Computer Based Tutorial in Sixteenth Century Counterpoint. Computer Music Journal, 9(4), (1985).
61. O’Shea, T., and Self, J., Learning and Teaching with Computers. London: Prentice-Hall. (1983).
62. Pachet, F., The MusES system: an environment for experimenting with knowledge representation techniques in tonal harmony. In First Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music, SBC&M, (pp. 195-201). Caxambu, Minas Gerais, Brazil. (1994).
63. Papert, S., Mindstorms. Brighton: The Harvester Press. (1980).
64. Pena, W., Problem seeking: an architectural programming primer (3rd ed.). Washington: AIA Press. (1987).
65. Pierce, J.R., The Science of Musical Sound, Scientific American Books, New York. (1983).
66. Pratt, G., The Dynamics of Harmony. Milton Keynes, Open University Press. (1984).
67. Puckette, M., The Patcher. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music conference 1988. Feedback papers 33, Feedback Studio Verlag, Cologne. (1988).
68. Rittel, H.W.J., and Webber, M.W., Planning Problems are wicked problems. In Cross, N., (Eds.), Developments in Design Methodology, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. (1984).
69. Roads, C. The Computer Music Tutorial. MIT Press. (1996).
70. Sanchez, M., Joseph, A., Dannenberg, R., Miller, P., Capell, P., and Joseph, R., Piano tutor: An Intelligent Keyboard Instruction System. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Music, St. Paul, Minnesota: AAAI. (1987).
71. Schaffer, J.W., Harmony Coach: An Exploration of Microcomputer-Based Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Music. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 18(1), 30-36, (1991).
72. Schön, DA., The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books. (1993).
73. Self, J., Computational Mathetics: Towards a Science of Learning Systems Design (CBLU Report No. 96/24). Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds. (1995).
74. Sharpies, M., The useof Computers to Aid the Teaching of Creative Writing. AEDS Journal. (1983).
75. Sleeman, D., and Brown, J.S., (Ed.). Intelligent Tutoring Systems. London: Academic Press. (1982).
76. Sloboda, J. A., The Musical Mind: The Cognitive Psychology of Music. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (1985).
77. Smith, M., and Holland, S., Motive: The development of an AI tool for Beginning Melody Composers. In Music Education: an artificial Intelligence approach, London: Springer Verlag. (1994).
78. Sorisio, L., Designing anIntelligent Tutoring System in Harmony. In Proceedings of International Computer Music Conference, Computer Music Association, San Francisco. (1987).
79. Spensley, F., and Elsom-Cook, M., Dominie: Teaching and assessment strategies. (CAL Research Group Technical Report No. 74). Open University, Milton Keynes, Great Britain. (1988).
80. Steedman, M., The Formal Description of Musical Perception. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh. (1972).
81. Steedman, M., A generative grammar for chord sequences. Music Psychology, 2(1), (1984).
82. Sundberg, J., A., Friberg, and Fryden, L., Rules forAutomated Performance of Ensemble Music. Contemporary Music Review, 3, (1989).
83. Taube, H., Common Music: A Music Composition Language in Common Lisp and CLOS. Computer Music Journal, 15(2), 21-32, (1991).
84. Thomas, M.T., Vivace: A Rule Based AI System for Composition. In International Computer Music Conference, (pp. 267-274). San Francisco. (1985)
85. Todd, N., A Computational Model of Rubato. In Clarke, E., and Emmerson, S., (Eds.), Music, Mind and Structure. (1989).
86. Van Hentenryk, P., and Dincbas, P., Forward checkingin Logic Programming. In Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Logic programming, (pp. 229-256). MIT Press. (1987).
87. Voyager, Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony, Interactive CD ROM. (1989).
88. Watson, C, A Prototype implementation of the Rhythm Machine. Masters Thesis, University of Aberdeen, Department of Computing Science. (1990).
89. Wenger, E., Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Los Altos, California: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1987).
90. Whitelock, D., Holland, S., and Howard, P., Groupwork, Computers and Music Education: an Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Group and Interactive Learning Conference, Strathclyde. (1994).
91. Whitelock, D., Holland, S., and Howard, P., Understanding Harmony and Technology in Music Education. In Sechrest, T., Thomas, M., and Estes, N., (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Technology and Education, (pp. 382-384). Orlando, Florida: University of Texas. (1995).
92. Yavelow, C, MacWorld Music & Sound Bible. San Mateo, California. IDG Books. (1992).