Frame-reflective policy analysis in practice: Co-evolution of a policy regime and an intractable controversy in biotechnology

Knowledge, Power, and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 201-228

  Jelsma, Jaap ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070614175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Ad hoc Group of Government Experts. (1986). Recombinant DNA Safety Considerations. Paris: OECD
2. Argyris, C. and D. Schön. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
3. Berg, P. (1974). Potential Biohazards of Recombinant DNA Molecules. Science 185: 303
4. Bijker, W.E. (1995). O f Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory ofSociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
5. Blom, C., B. de Boer, L. Leydesdorff, J. Oberski, E. van der Poel, A. van der Vusse and B. Waasdorp. (1977). Knutselen aan de Erfelijkheid: Een tegenvoorstel, Wetenschap en Samenleving 77 (6):3-46
6. Callon, M. (1980). Struggles and Negotiations to Define What Is Problematic and What Is Not: The Socio-logic of Translation, in K.D. Knorr, R. Krohn and R. Whitley, eds. The Social Process of Scientific Investigation. Sociology of the Sciences, Volume IV: 197-219. Dordrecht: Reidel
7. Collingridge, D. (1980). The Social Control of Technology. London: Pinter Publishers
8. Commissie Belast met hetToezicht op Genetische Manipulatie. (1977). Tweede Jaarverslag. Amsterdam: KNAW
9. Commissie ter Bestudering van de Maatschappelijke en Ethische Aspecten van Werkzaamheden met Erfelijkheidsmateriaal. (1983). Eindrapport. 's-Gravenhage: SDU Staatsuitgeverij
10. Daele, W. van den. (1978). The Ambivalent Legitimacy of the Pursuit of Knowledge. Science, Society and Education, Conference Proceedings. Amsterdam: Free University, 23-63
11. De la Bruheeze, A. A. (1992). Political Construction of Technology: Nuclear Waste Disposal in the United States, 1945-1972. WMW-publikatie 10. Enschede: University of Twente
12. Dijk, G. van and W.A. Smit. (1976). Kleine Kansen-Grote Gevolgen: Gevolgen van een Groot Ongeluk met een Kemcentrale. Enschede: De Boerderij, Universiteit Twente
13. Dunn, W.N. (1988). Methods of the Second Type: Coping with the Wilderness of Conventional Policy Analysis. Policy Studies Review, 7:720-737
14. Environmentally Dangerous Substances Act (Wet Milieugevaarlijke Stoffen), Editie Schuurrman en Jordens 147-Vila (1994). Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink
15. Funtowicz, S. and J. Ravetz. (1989). Usable Knowledge, Usable Ignorance: A Discourse of Two Sorts of Science. Conference paper, Arc et Senans
16. Funtowicz, S. and J. Ravetz. (1990). Uncertainty and Quality in Science fo r Policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer
17. Grin, J., H. van de Graaf, and R. Hoppe. (1997). Technology Assessment through Interaction: A Guide. The Hague: Rathenau Institute
18. Groenewold, H. (1974). We moeten kemenergie-maar mag dat wel? Wetenschap en Samenleving, 74(8):4-13
19. Group of National Experts on Safety in Biotechnology. (1993). Field Releases of Transgenic Plants, 1986-1992: An Analysis. Paris: OECD
20. Hajer, M.A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press
21. Hisschemöller, H. (1993). De Democratic van Problemen: De Relatie Tussen de Inhoud van Beleidsproblemen en Methoden van Politieke Besluitvorming. Amsterdam: Free University Press
22. Hoppe, R. (1996). Inleiding. Leren Met Beieid: Beleidsverandering en Beleidsgericht Leren Bij NIMBY-, Milieu-en Technologiebeleid. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis
23. Jelsma, J. (1995). Learning about Learning in the Development of Biotechnology, in A. Rip, T.J. Misa, and J. Schot, eds. Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London: Pinter Publishers, 141-165
24. Jelsma, J. (1999). De Introductie in Het Milieu van Genetisch Gemodificeerde Organismen: Van Onhandelbaar Naar Onderhandelhaar Risico? Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut
25. Jelsma, J. and W.A. Smit. (1986). Risks of Recombinant DNA Research: From Uncertainty to Certainty, in H.A. Becker and A. Porter, eds. Impact Assessment Today, Volume II. Utrecht: Jan van Arkel, 715-741
26. Jelsma, J., A.A. de la Bruheze, S. Everts, and M. Kirejczyk. (1990). Double Network Dynamics: An Aspect of Regularity in the Development of Science Based Technologies. Conference paper, Haren
27. Krimsky, S. (1991). Genetic Alchemy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
28. McCrea, F.B. and G.E. Markle. (1984). The Estrogen Replacement Controversy in the USA and UK: Different Answers to the Same Question? Social Studies of Science, 14(1): 1-27
29. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (1991). Regeringsbeslissing Meerjarenplan Gewasbescherming. 's-Gravenhage: Tweede Karner der Staten Generaal,TK 21677
30. Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen. (1979). Innovatie: Het Overheidsbeleid Inzake Technologische Verniewing in de Nederlandse Samenleving. 's-Gravenhage: SDU Staatsuitgeverij
31. Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen. (1984). Regeringsstandpunt Recombinant DNA. 's-Gravenhage: Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal, TK 18422, nr. 2
32. Minister van Volksgezondheid en Milieuhygiene. (1977). Brief aan de Voorziter der Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal. 's-Gravenhage: Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal,TK 14438, nr.2
33. Morone, J.G. and E.J. Woodhouse. (1986). Averting Catastrophe: Strategies fo r Risky Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press
34. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Technology Assessment. (1989). Genetisch Gemodificeerde Organismen: Introductie in het Milieu. NOTA. 's-Gravenhage: SDU Staatsuitgeverij
35. Natuur en Milieu. (1996). Inventory of Views of Non-Governmental Organizations on the Risk Evaluation of Genetically Modified Organisms in Six Cases. Utrecht: Natuur en Milieu
36. Rein, M. and D. Schön. (1986). Frame-Reflective Policy Discourse. Beleidsanalyse, 86(4):4-18
37. Rip, A. (1995). Introduction of New Technology: Making Use of Recent Insights from Sociology and Economics of technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 1 (4): 121-138
38. Rip, A., T.J. Misa, and J. Schot. (1995). Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London: Pinter Publishers
39. Rip, A. and S. Talma. (1998). Antagonistic Patterns and New Technologies, in C. Disco and B.J.M. van der Meulen, eds. Getting New Technologies Together: Studies in Making Sociotechnical Order: Berlin: De Gruyter, 285-307
40. Sabatier, P. and H.C. Jenkins-Smith. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
41. Sarink, H. (1989). Evaluatie van de Workshop 'Noodzaak, Wenselijkheid, Voorzorgen en Regelgeving Inzake het in het Milieu Brengen van Genetisch Gemodificeerde Organismen. 's-Gravenhage: NOTA
42. Schön, D. and M. Rein. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books
43. Schot, J. and A. Rip. (1997). The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54: 251-268
44. Schuurman, A and A. Jordens. (1994). Wet Milieugevaarlijke Stoffen, editie 147-Vila. Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink
45. Schwarz, M. and M. Thompson. (1990). Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf
46. Stemerding, D. and J. Jelsma. (1995). Wege zur sozial verträglichen Gentechnologie in den Niederlanden, österreichische Zeitschrift für Sociologie, 3:56-70
47. Stemerding, D. and J. Jelsma. (1998). Dutch Roads to Socially Acceptable Gene Technology, International Journal of Technology Assessment
48. Termeer, C.J.A.M. and J.F.M. Koppejan. (1997). Managing Perceptions in Networks, in W.J.M. Kikkert, E.H. Klein, and J.F.M. Koppejan, eds. Managing Complex Networks: London: Sage, 79-98
49. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (1978). Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risk in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/ 014). Washington, DC
50. Vaste Commissie voorhetWetenschapsbeleid. (1985). 8Iste Vergadering. 's-Gravenhage: Tweede Karner der Staten-Generaal
51. Working Party on the Practice of Genetic Manipulation. (1976). Report. London: HMSO
52. Wright, S. (1994). Molecular Politics: Developing American and British Regulatory Policy fo r Genetic Engineering 1972-1982. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
53. Wynne, B. (1989). Frameworks of Rationality in Risk Management: Towards the Testing of Naive Sociology, in J. Brown, ed. Environmental Threats: Perceptions, Analysis and Management. London: Belhaven Press, 33-48
54. Wynne, B. (1998). Technology Assessment and Reflexive Social Learning: Observations from the Risk Field, in A. Rip, T.J. Misa, and J. Schot, eds., Managing Technology in Society. London: Pinter Publishers